English
Grade 4 · spring eng.g4.s

Grade 4 Spring — Research Report Writing, Source Evaluation, Figurative Language Deepening, and Formal/Informal Register

18 weeks 300 min/week 22 lessons 17 skills 50 exercises 5 assessments

Overview

Grade 4 Spring is the term children become RESEARCHERS — writers who investigate a topic and build a multi-paragraph informational report from at least three sources, with explicit citation. Six intertwined threads run across 18 weeks. (1) RESEARCH-REPORT WRITING (CCSS W.4.2, W.4.7, W.4.8) is the primary genre and the term's writing arc. Children investigate one self-chosen research topic across the term, gather notes from ≥3 sources, organize their notes into categories, build a category-boxes-and-bullets planner, draft an outline, draft the report (5-7 paragraphs), revise using named moves, peer-edit, and publish at the Researcher's Showcase. Each report has an introduction (hook + topic-orienting context + research-thesis), 3-5 category-organized body paragraphs each using the TIES routine (TOPIC-SENTENCE + INFORMATION + EVIDENCE-WITH-CITATION + SO-WHAT — the informational extension of fall's CREEL), and a conclusion that SYNTHESIZES findings rather than just summarizing them. The Calkins Bringing-History-to-Life informational arc, the Hochman SPO-and-MPO, Graham & Perin's evidence-based writing strategies, and Wineburg's sourcing heuristic anchor the work. (2) NOTE-TAKING STRATEGIES. Two-column note-taking (paraphrase column + source column) is taught explicitly. The PARAPHRASE-vs-QUOTE distinction (introduced in G3-spring) is deepened — children paraphrase facts but quote when the source's exact words matter. Notes are organized by CATEGORY (each category becomes a body paragraph). (3) SOURCE EVALUATION introduction (Wineburg sourcing adapted for G4).

The WHO-WHEN-CHECK-IT three-question card: WHO wrote this source (author, expertise)? WHEN was it written (still current, or outdated)? Can the claim be CHECKED against another source (corroboration)? Children apply this card to every source before using it. (4) IN-TEXT SOURCE ATTRIBUTION and SIMPLE WORKS-CITED ENTRIES. Children learn signal phrases ('According to ___,' / 'In her book ___, ___ writes,' / '___ explains that ___') for embedding source material in their own writing. They also build a simple works-cited list (Author. Title. Year.) at the end of their report — entry-level MLA-9 format adapted for G4. (5) FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE DEEPENING (CCSS L.4.5.a-c). Similes and metaphors continue from fall; PERSONIFICATION is added; IDIOMS, ADAGES, and PROVERBS are introduced (L.4.5.b). Children recognize these in mentor texts (especially in Naomi Shihab Nye, Yuyi Morales, Joyce Sidman, Linda Sue Park) and use them as craft moves in their own writing. SYNONYMS and ANTONYMS (L.4.5.c) with PRECISE WORD CHOICE (L.4.3.a) are taught with the synonym-gradient strip — children pick the precise word (warm vs. hot vs. scorching) for the meaning intended. (6) GRAMMAR DEEPENING and REGISTER. L.4.3.b — choosing PUNCTUATION FOR EFFECT (a colon to introduce a list, a dash to interrupt, an exclamation point for emphasis, a question mark even in informational writing). L.4.3.c — differentiating FORMAL ENGLISH from INFORMAL DISCOURSE (when the audience or purpose requires formal register vs. when informal is appropriate); the research report is FORMAL register, while a journal entry or a peer conversation is INFORMAL. (7) MECHANICS AND VOCABULARY. HFW Set 10 (next 25 high-frequency words tilted toward research and academic vocabulary). Tier-2 Set 10 (15 research/inquiry/source words: research, investigate, source, credible, reliable, paraphrase, summarize, cite, attribute, category, classify, synthesize, conclude, analyze, evaluate). DOMAIN-SPECIFIC TIER-3 VOCABULARY (academic Tier-3 intro) is taught per-child based on their research topic — each child builds a 10-15 word topic-vocabulary bank. The WORKSHOP CONTINUES from fall with the researcher's-workshop variant — children name a RESEARCH QUESTION (a topic they want to investigate), use the CATEGORY-BOXES-AND-BULLETS planner, take notes in two columns, build an OUTLINE, and follow the named revision-moves anchor adapted for research mode. REVISION moves: stronger word choice with Tier-2 Set 10 substitutions, add SO-WHAT after each evidence, combine sentences for compound-complex variety, check source citation (every fact has a signal phrase), check synonym gradient (the precise word — not just the first one), add a figurative-language move where appropriate, check register (consistent formal throughout), check punctuation for effect, add a category-link transition at each paragraph opening, check works-cited list. The 8-CRITERION PEER-EDITING RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH is formally introduced in lesson 19: (1) intro has hook + topic-orienting context + research-thesis, (2) 3-5 body paragraphs with TIES, (3) category-link transitions at paragraph openings, (4) every fact has source attribution with signal phrase, (5) ≥1 paraphrase + ≥1 direct quotation distinguishable, (6) works-cited list with ≥3 entries, (7) consistent formal register, (8) conclusion synthesizes (not just summarizes). OUTLINING is introduced as a pre-writing strategy distinct from boxes-and-bullets — the outline is more linear and serves as the draft-script. The term closes with the RESEARCHER'S SHOWCASE — a classroom-wide walkabout where each child presents their published research report alongside a single-page evidence panel (a chart, photo, or quoted source with caption) and answers two questions from visitors, using formal register in the presentation and Tier-2 Set 10 vocabulary in answering questions.

Essential questions

  • How does a researcher take a question and build an answer from multiple sources — and what is the difference between COPYING from a source and CITING a source?
  • What makes a source CREDIBLE — and what does a researcher do when two sources disagree?
  • How does a writer move from gathering NOTES to building an OUTLINE to drafting a REPORT — and why does the order matter?
  • What is the difference between a PARAPHRASE (the source's idea in your words) and a QUOTE (the source's exact words) — and when does each fit?
  • Why does a research report use FORMAL register while a personal letter uses INFORMAL — and what specific word choices signal each?
  • How does a writer pick the PRECISE word (warm vs. hot vs. scorching) — and what does precision do for the reader?
  • What is the difference between a SIMILE, a METAPHOR, a PERSONIFICATION, an IDIOM, an ADAGE, and a PROVERB — and when does each fit in informational writing?
  • How does choosing the COLON, the DASH, the EXCLAMATION POINT, or the QUESTION MARK change what the reader hears in your voice?
  • Why does a research report need a CATEGORY-based organization rather than a chronological or claim-based one — and how does the category structure serve the reader?
  • How does a researcher SYNTHESIZE findings in a conclusion — rather than just summarize them?

Enduring understandings

  • A research report investigates a TOPIC by gathering information from multiple sources, organizing it into CATEGORIES, and synthesizing findings into a multi-paragraph informational piece.
  • The TIES routine — TOPIC-SENTENCE + INFORMATION + EVIDENCE-WITH-CITATION + SO-WHAT — builds an informational body paragraph that develops one category of the research topic.
  • Every fact from a source must be ATTRIBUTED in-text using a signal phrase ('According to ___,' or '___ writes that ___'); failure to attribute is plagiarism.
  • A SOURCE is CREDIBLE when we can answer the WHO-WHEN-CHECK-IT questions: who wrote it (qualified?), when was it written (current?), can the claim be checked against another source (corroborated?).
  • A PARAPHRASE puts the source's idea into your own words; a QUOTE uses the source's exact words inside quotation marks; both still require attribution.
  • NOTES organize information by CATEGORY; one category will become one body paragraph; each note record includes the source so it can be cited.
  • An OUTLINE is a linear pre-writing tool with section headings, sub-categories, and details — it is the script the writer follows when drafting.
  • A research report uses FORMAL register (precise vocabulary, complete sentences, third-person, no contractions); INFORMAL register fits personal writing and peer talk (contractions, first-person, casual vocabulary) — register is a choice the writer makes for the audience.
  • Synonyms have similar meanings but are not identical; a thesaurus helps the writer pick the PRECISE word for the meaning intended.
  • Antonyms are words with opposite meanings; using an antonym thoughtfully (rather than 'not [synonym]') can sharpen a sentence.
  • SIMILES compare with LIKE or AS; METAPHORS say X IS Y; PERSONIFICATION gives human qualities to non-human things; IDIOMS are figurative expressions whose meaning is not literal; ADAGES are old sayings holding general truth; PROVERBS are sayings offering a piece of advice.
  • Punctuation can be chosen for EFFECT: a colon introduces, a dash interrupts, an exclamation point emphasizes, a question mark invites — and skilled writers choose with purpose.
  • A research report's CONCLUSION SYNTHESIZES findings: it pulls categories together into a 'so what does it all mean' statement, not merely a summary of body paragraphs.
  • A WORKS-CITED LIST at the end of a report names every source used (Author. Title. Year.) so readers can find and check the sources for themselves.

Lessons (22)

# Title Min Skills
1 Spring Launch — Research-Question Inventory and the Term of Researching 55 2
2 Who Wrote It? When? Can We Check It? — Source Evaluation with the WHO-WHEN-CHECK-IT Card 55 2
3 Two-Column Notes — Paraphrase vs. Direct Quote with Source Attribution 55 2
4 Categories — Organizing Notes into Body Paragraphs (with Tier-2 Set 10 Launch) 60 2
5 Corroboration and Paraphrase Practice — When Two Sources Agree (or Disagree) 50 2
6 Meet TIES — Topic-Sentence, Information, Evidence-with-Citation, So-What 55 2
7 Signal Phrases — Five Ways to Attribute a Source In-Text 50 2
8 Figurative Deepening — Similes, Metaphors, and Personification in Informational Writing 50 2
9 Outlining as Pre-Writing — From Planner to Linear Outline 55 2
10 Tier-2 Set 10 Part 2 — Paraphrase, Summarize, Cite, Attribute, Category — and Drafting from the Outline 55 2
11 Synonym Gradient and Antonym Sharpening — Precise Word Choice 50 2
12 Embedded Quotations and Source Citation in Body Paragraphs 50 2
13 Idioms, Adages, and Proverbs — L.4.5.b in Mentor Texts and in Own Writing 50 2
14 Compound-Complex Sentences in Informational Prose — and Tier-2 Set 10 Part 3 50 2
15 Domain-Specific Tier-3 Vocabulary — Building Your Topic Word-Bank 50 2
16 Revision — 10 Named Moves on the Research Draft 60 2
17 Register — Formal vs. Informal — and Punctuation for Effect 55 2
18 Works-Cited List — Simple MLA-9 Format — and Final Figurative Pass 55 2
19 Peer-Edit — The 8-Criterion Research-Mode Rubric 60 2
20 Publication Booklet and Evidence Panel Design 60 2
21 Showcase Rehearsal — Formal Register in Speech and Final Polish 50 2
22 The Researcher's Showcase — Final Publication, Visitor Interactions, and Self-Reflection 90 2

Skills (17)

Assessments (5)

  • Summative With Self Reflection week 18 100 min covers 17 skills
  • Formative Summative Mix week 9 50 min covers 7 skills
  • Formative Observation week 10 and week 18 15 min covers 1 skill
  • Assessment As Learning week 18 during publishing 25 min covers 1 skill
  • Formative weeks 11 13 15 17 10 min covers 3 skills

Standards alignment

Framework
CCSS-ELA
W.4.2W.4.2.aW.4.2.bW.4.2.cW.4.2.dW.4.2.eW.4.4W.4.5W.4.6W.4.7W.4.8W.4.9 + 36 more
Framework
English National Curriculum
Y4 V/G/P: using fronted adverbials,...Y4 V/G/P: using conjunctions,...Y4 V/G/P: difference between plural...Y4 V/G/P: Standard English forms for...Y4 Composition: discussing and...Y4 Composition: organising...Y4 Composition: in non-narrative...Y4 Composition: assessing the...Y4 Composition: proof-read for...Y4 Composition: read aloud their own...Y4 Reading: retrieve and record...Y5 V/G/P (stretch): use of commas to... + 2 more
Framework
NCTE/IRA Standards
NCTE-4 Adjust use of spoken,...NCTE-5 Employ a wide range of...NCTE-6 Apply knowledge of language...NCTE-7 Conduct research on issues...NCTE-8 Use a variety of...NCTE-11 Participate as...NCTE-12 Use spoken, written, and...
Framework
CEFR (early literacy adaptation)
A2+ Writing — can write a series of...B1 Writing (entry) — can write...B1 Writing (entry) — can summarise,...A2+ Reading — can find specific...B1 Reading (entry) — can scan longer...A2+ Speaking — can give a short,...B1 Speaking interaction (entry) —...

Pedagogical anchors

  • The Writing Revolution / Hochman Method — single-paragraph outline (SPO) extended to multiple-paragraph outline (MPO) for informational/research writing; conjunction-driven sentence stretching with 'because', 'but', 'so', and 'although' applied to information-sentences; embedded-quotation drills; sentence-combining for compound-complex sentences in research context; question-stems for source-interrogation (who, when, where, what, why, how)
    SPO-for-informational-body-paragraph routine extended to TIES (TOPIC-SENTENCE + INFORMATION + EVIDENCE-WITH-CITATION + SO-WHAT) in lessons 3, 6, 9, 12, 15; MPO for the 5-7 paragraph research report introduced in lesson 9; sentence-stretching applied to information-sentences in lessons 8 and 11; sentence-combining for compound-complex sentences extended to research-report sentences in lesson 14; Hochman 'because-but-so' drill applied to category-based note organization in lesson 4
  • Lucy Calkins' Units of Study — Bringing History to Life / Informational Writing (Grade 4 Bend I-III: gathering and categorizing information, drafting and revising for clarity, publishing as expert)
    Research-report arc across lessons 1-3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 22; researcher's-notebook launch in lesson 1; expert-topic-territory-with-research-questions in lesson 1; category-boxes-and-bullets planner in lesson 4; researcher's-workshop format in lesson 6; revision-for-clarity in lesson 16; Researcher's Showcase publication in lesson 22
  • Graham & Perin 'Writing Next' — explicit strategy instruction for planning, revising, and editing (effect size 0.82); summarization instruction (effect size 0.82); sentence-combining (effect size 0.50); inquiry activities (effect size 0.32); word processing where developmentally appropriate
    Explicit planning strategy taught through category-boxes-and-bullets template (lessons 4, 9); revision strategy taught through named-moves anchor for research-mode (lesson 16); sentence-combining drill in lessons 14 and 17 to produce compound-complex sentences within informational prose; summarization-of-source instruction in lessons 4 and 5; inquiry-question generation in lesson 1
  • Beck & McKeown 'Bringing Words to Life' — three-encounter Tier-2 vocabulary with research/inquiry-flavored academic-precision words and source-evaluation vocabulary
    Tier-2 Set 10 launches in lessons 4, 10, 14, 17 with research/inquiry/source academic words (research, investigate, source, credible, reliable, paraphrase, summarize, cite, attribute, category, classify, synthesize, conclude, analyze, evaluate)
  • Wineburg historical-thinking heuristics — SOURCING (who wrote it, when, why) introduced at elementary-appropriate level; corroboration (does another source say the same?)
    Source-evaluation routine taught explicitly in lessons 2 and 5 using the WHO-WHEN-CHECK-IT three-question card (Wineburg sourcing adapted for G4); corroboration check in lesson 9 when ≥2 sources support the same fact; carried forward to spring history's primary-source identification work
  • Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, Johnston 'Words Their Way' — synonym/antonym sorts (L.4.5.c); idiom/adage/proverb sorts (L.4.5.b); domain-specific tier-3 vocabulary acquisition routines for research topics
    Synonym/antonym word sort in lesson 11; idiom/adage/proverb sort in lesson 13; precise-word-choice (synonym selection) revision move in lesson 16; domain-specific Tier-3 vocabulary acquisition through research-topic word-banks across the term
  • Handwriting Without Tears — Grade 4 cursive consolidation continued (full set, speed building); keyboarding-readiness continued from fall; transition to typed publication for many children
    Cursive maintenance in spiral_review_plan; keyboarding-readiness drill twice weekly; final published research report may be in print, cursive, or typed at child's choice (typed encouraged for those who have reached keyboarding fluency)
  • Strickland & Stahl — distributed retrieval for HFW automaticity
    HFW Set 10 spaced rotation across all 18 weeks per spiral_review_plan; daily 5-minute retrieval routine
  • Routman 'Writing Essentials' and Atwell 'In the Middle' — workshop format extended with researcher's-workshop variant
    Researcher's-workshop format launched lesson 6; status-of-the-class with RESEARCH stages (QUESTION, SOURCES, NOTES, OUTLINE, DRAFT, REVISE, PEER-EDIT, PUBLISH); 8-criterion peer-editing rubric adapted for research-mode introduced in lesson 19
  • Vacca & Vacca 'Content Area Reading' — note-taking strategies (Cornell notes adapted for G4, two-column note format, paraphrase column + source column); category-based organization of notes
    Two-column note-taking introduced in lesson 3; paraphrase-vs-quote distinction taught in lesson 3; category-based note organization in lesson 4; notes-to-outline transition in lesson 9

Depth bar

Covers
CCSS
W.4.2.a-e
introduce a topic, group related information into paragraphs and sections including formatting/illustrations/multimedia when useful, develop the topic with facts/definitions/concrete details/quotations/other information and examples related to the topic, link ideas within categories using words and phrases such as 'another', 'for example', 'also', 'because', use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary, and provide a concluding statement or section, in full multi-paragraph form drawing from ≥3 sources
W.4.7
conduct short research projects that build knowledge through investigation of different aspects of a topic
W.4.8
recall relevant information from experiences or gather relevant information from print and digital sources; take notes and categorize information, and provide a list of sources
L.4.3.a
choose words and phrases to convey ideas precisely
L.4.3.b
choose punctuation for effect
L.4.3.c
differentiate between contexts that call for formal English and situations where informal discourse is appropriate
L.4.5.a
similes and metaphors
L.4.5.b
recognize and explain the meaning of common idioms, adages, and proverbs
L.4.5.c
demonstrate understanding of words by relating them to their opposites — antonyms — and to words with similar but not identical meanings — synonyms
L.4.6
in full
Exceeds

CCSS by formally teaching the 5-7 PARAGRAPH RESEARCH REPORT with an introduction (hook + topic-orienting context + research-thesis), category-organized body paragraphs (TIES routine — TOPIC-SENTENCE + INFORMATION + EVIDENCE-WITH-CITATION + SO-WHAT — extending the G4-fall CREEL into informational mode), and a conclusion that synthesizes findings (W.5.2 entry expectation), by formally introducing IN-TEXT SOURCE ATTRIBUTION ('According to ___,' / 'In her book ___, ___ explains that ___') and SIMPLE WORKS-CITED ENTRIES (W.5.8 entry expectation; MLA 9 simplified for elementary), by teaching SOURCE EVALUATION on three criteria (WHO wrote it; WHEN was it written; can the claim be CHECKED against another source — Y5 NC entry expectation; entry-level Wineburg sourcing heuristic), by introducing NOTE-TAKING with paraphrase vs. quote and category-based organization (W.5.8/Y5 NC entry expectations), by introducing OUTLINING as a pre-writing strategy distinct from boxes-and-bullets (CCSS W.5.5 entry expectation), and by introducing FORMAL/INFORMAL REGISTER as a craft choice (L.4.3.c) with explicit register-shift exercises (CCSS L.5.3.b entry expectation)