Grade 4 Spring — Research Report Writing, Source Evaluation, Figurative Language Deepening, and Formal/Informal Register
English · WR G4 eng.g4.s.wr.peer_editing_8_criterion_research

Apply the 8-criterion research-mode peer-editing rubric to a partner's research-report draft

Read a partner's research-report draft and apply the MG-13 8-criterion research-mode rubric. Mark each criterion YES / PARTLY / NO, write a one-line specific note (quote or example), and suggest ≥1 named revision move from MG-18 for each PARTLY/NO. Do NOT re-write the partner's draft. Confer briefly; the writer picks up the pencil last.

Mastery threshold
85%
Min instances
6
Typical minutes
40
Spaced intervals (days)
1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60
Prereqs
Successors
  • eng.g5.f.wr.peer_editing_extended_revision_conference
    (not yet loaded)
Common misconceptions
  • Re-writes partner's draft instead of marking the rubric and conferring.
  • Marks 'YES' on every criterion to be nice, defeating the rubric's purpose.

Exercise pool (2)

Diff Stem Type
3 After your peer-edit conference, name 2 moves from the conference you will ACT ON. Frame: 'I will ___ because the rubric criterion ___.' writer response to peer
4 Apply the 8-criterion research-mode rubric to your partner's draft. Mark YES/PARTLY/NO with a one-line specific note for each. Suggest... peer edit 8 criterion research