English
Grade 6 · spring eng.g6.s

Grade 6 Spring — Rhetorical Devices, Sentence Craft, and Formal Multi-Pass Peer Revision Protocols

18 weeks 300 min/week 20 lessons 19 skills 52 exercises 3 assessments

Overview

Grade 6 Spring is the term children become RHETORICIANS — writers and speakers who understand and deploy the named devices that make arguments memorable and persuasive. Building on G6-fall's argumentative-writing foundation, students learn to identify, analyze, and apply six rhetorical devices in close reading of mentor speeches and in their own composition. Eight intertwined threads run across 18 weeks.

  1. 01
    RHETORICAL DEVICES

    are the PRIMARY CRAFT ARC — six named devices taught with reading-side identification AND writing-side construction: ETHOS/PATHOS/LOGOS (applied — extending fall introduction); PARALLELISM (matching grammatical structure across phrases/clauses); ANAPHORA (repetition at the start of successive clauses — 'I have a dream that ___'); ASYNDETON (omission of conjunctions for compressed power — 'I came, I saw, I conquered'); RHETORICAL QUESTION (a question posed for effect — 'What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?'); ANTITHESIS introduced (juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in parallel structure — 'not the color of skin but the content of character'). Each device is taught through a mentor speech, identified in a close reading, and then constructed in students' own writing.

  2. 02
    SENTENCE-LEVEL CRAFT

    extends G6-fall's 6-pattern sentence variation toolkit with PARALLEL STRUCTURE (CCSS L.6.1.e applied — matching grammatical forms in a series), ACTIVE vs. PASSIVE VOICE for effect (passive is not banned but deliberately chosen for agent-obscuring/scientific objectivity/rhythm — taught via Lanham's Paramedic Method), and SENTENCE RHYTHM (short-sentence-for-emphasis, long-sentence-for-development, tricolon 3-part parallel).

  3. 03
    GRAMMAR REVIEW

    continues L.6.1 pronoun mastery from fall (case, intensive, consistency, vague antecedents, Standard-English variations) — review and integration only, not new acquisition.

  4. 04
    PUNCTUATION DEEPER

    (L.6.2.a continued) introduces SEMICOLON FOR COMPOUND SENTENCES with 3 rules (independent clauses joined without conjunction; before conjunctive adverbs like 'however/therefore' with comma after; in lists with internal commas) and COLON FOR LISTS AND APPOSITIVES with 4 rules (introduce a list; introduce an appositive; before a quotation; between two independent clauses where the second explains the first).

  5. 05
    L.6.3.a SENTENCE VARIATION

    continued; L.6.3.b CONSISTENCY IN STYLE AND TONE deepened — voice-for-effect choices examined in mentor texts and in own drafts.

  6. 06
    FORMAL MULTI-PASS PEER REVISION PROTOCOLS

    replace G6-fall's single-pass SBAR with a three-stage discipline — Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience — 14 criteria), Pass 2 SENTENCE-LEVEL (rhetorical devices applied; active/passive choice; rhythm; parallelism — 10 criteria), Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronoun mastery; semicolon/colon; comma rules; spelling — 12 criteria). Each pass has its own rubric and named moves.

  7. 07
    L.6.4-6 VOCABULARY

    continues at G6 as primary focus: IDIOM ANALYSIS (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative meaning, register, audience appropriateness — L.6.5.a), DENOTATION/CONNOTATION distinction deepened (L.6.5.b/c — separately taught before integration), WORD RELATIONSHIPS through ANALOGY COMPLETION (a:b::c:d format with 4 relation types — synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category — L.6.5.b), REFERENCE-MATERIAL LITERACY for etymology look-up as default routine (L.6.4.c-d), Tier-2 Set 14 rhetorical/literary-analysis precision (15 words: rhetoric, device, parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, antithesis, tricolon, juxtaposition, register, audience, persona, tone, voice, rhythm, cadence).

  8. 08
    LITERARY-ANALYSIS STRETCH GENRE

    students write a 4-5 paragraph literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay (W.6.2.a-f informative/explanatory applied to RI.6.4-6-8 rhetorical analysis) analyzing HOW a mentor writer uses rhetorical devices for argumentative effect. SOAP framework (Speaker/Occasion/Audience/Purpose) anchors the introduction. The essay teaches the reading-writing link — close-reading-as-warrant for an argumentative interpretation.

  9. 09
    PUBLIC SPEAKING AS RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE

    SL.6.4-6 extended. The culminating piece is PRESENTED with rhetorical devices marked in the script (anaphora highlighted, rhetorical questions paused for, parallelism emphasized) and audience-attuned voice and pace. The term closes with the RHETORICIAN'S FORUM — a classroom-wide oral-performance event where each child presents their argument with at least 3 named rhetorical devices identified and marked in the delivery script.

Essential questions

  • What is a RHETORICAL DEVICE — and how does it differ from a FIGURE OF SPEECH or a GRAMMAR RULE?
  • What is PARALLELISM — and why does matching grammatical structure create emphasis, balance, and memorability?
  • What is ANAPHORA — and what is the effect of repeating the same words at the start of successive clauses?
  • What is ASYNDETON — and how does removing conjunctions change the rhythm and intensity of a sentence?
  • What is a RHETORICAL QUESTION — and why is a question that doesn't expect an answer sometimes more persuasive than a statement?
  • What is ANTITHESIS — and why does setting two contrasting ideas in parallel structure create such a powerful claim?
  • How does ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS (introduced in fall) shape an arguer's choice of rhetorical device for a specific audience?
  • What is the difference between ACTIVE and PASSIVE voice — and when should a writer choose passive deliberately rather than by accident?
  • What is sentence RHYTHM — and how do short sentences for emphasis, long sentences for development, and tricolons (3-part parallel) shape a reader's experience?
  • When do I use a SEMICOLON vs. a COLON vs. a COMMA — and what are the 3 semicolon rules and 4 colon rules?
  • What is the difference between DENOTATION (dictionary meaning) and CONNOTATION (associations) — and why does it matter for word choice in argument?
  • What is an IDIOM — and how do I analyze it (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative, register, audience appropriateness)?
  • What is an ANALOGY — and how do the 4 relation types (synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category) help me understand word relationships?
  • What are the THREE PASSES of formal peer revision — CONTENT, SENTENCE, MECHANICS — and what is each pass FOR?
  • How does a writer PERFORM their argument orally — and how do device markings in the script (anaphora highlight, rhetorical-question pause, parallelism emphasis) shape the delivery?

Enduring understandings

  • A RHETORICAL DEVICE is a NAMED PATTERN of language deliberately deployed for argumentative effect. Unlike a figure of speech (which describes how meaning works) or a grammar rule (which describes what is correct), a rhetorical device is a CHOICE about how to ARRANGE language for impact.
  • PARALLELISM — matching grammatical structure across phrases or clauses — creates balance, emphasis, and memorability. The mismatch ('to read, to write, and writing speeches') breaks the pattern and loses the effect.
  • ANAPHORA — repetition at the start of successive clauses — accumulates emotional and logical force. Each repetition raises the stakes; departure from the pattern signals climax.
  • ASYNDETON — omission of conjunctions — compresses energy. 'I came, I saw, I conquered' is faster, more decisive, and more memorable than 'I came AND I saw AND I conquered.'
  • A RHETORICAL QUESTION poses a question whose answer the speaker assumes the audience already shares — used to engage, provoke, or make the audience feel they have reached the conclusion themselves.
  • ANTITHESIS sets two contrasting ideas in parallel grammatical structure ('not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character'). The parallel structure makes the contrast inescapable.
  • ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS (Aristotle's three modes) shape the arguer's choice of device. Ethos-heavy arguments rely on speaker credibility; pathos-heavy on emotional appeal; logos-heavy on reasoning. Most strong arguments balance all three.
  • ACTIVE voice foregrounds the agent ('Maya wrote the essay'). PASSIVE voice obscures or backgrounds the agent ('The essay was written'). Passive is appropriate for scientific objectivity, when the actor is unknown, or for deliberate rhythmic effect — never by accident.
  • Sentence RHYTHM shapes meaning: short sentences for emphasis ('Stop. Listen.'); long sentences for development with embedded clauses; tricolons (3-part parallel) for memorable closure ('government of the people, by the people, for the people').
  • The SEMICOLON joins two independent clauses without a conjunction (Rule 1); appears before a conjunctive adverb like 'however / therefore' with a comma after (Rule 2); separates items in a complex list with internal commas (Rule 3). The COLON introduces a list (Rule 1); introduces an appositive (Rule 2); precedes a quotation (Rule 3); joins two independent clauses where the second explains the first (Rule 4).
  • DENOTATION is the dictionary meaning of a word; CONNOTATION is the cultural and emotional association it carries. 'House' and 'home' have similar denotations but very different connotations.
  • An IDIOM is a fixed phrase whose meaning is not the sum of its words. Idioms carry CULTURAL ORIGIN (where the phrase came from), LITERAL vs. FIGURATIVE meaning, REGISTER (formal/informal), and AUDIENCE APPROPRIATENESS (some idioms travel across cultures; others do not).
  • An ANALOGY in a:b::c:d format reveals one of four RELATION TYPES: synonym/antonym (hot:cold::up:down), part/whole (finger:hand::petal:flower), cause/effect (rain:flood::study:knowledge), item/category (rose:flower::oak:tree). Naming the relation is how you complete the analogy.
  • FORMAL PEER REVISION proceeds in THREE PASSES: Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience — does the argument hold up?); Pass 2 SENTENCE (rhetorical devices applied; voice; rhythm; parallelism — is the language doing rhetorical work?); Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronouns; punctuation; spelling — are the conventions clean?). Doing all three at once is worse than doing each well. Each pass has its own rubric and its own attention.
  • Public speaking is RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE. A script with devices marked — anaphora highlighted for stress, rhetorical questions marked for pause, parallelism underlined for emphasis — directs the delivery. The script and the voice work together; neither is sufficient alone.

Lessons (20)

# Title Min Skills
1 Launching rhetoric — ethos/pathos/logos applied to mentor speeches (Yousafzai Nobel, Sotomayor Princeton) 60 2
2 L.6.1.e Standard-English variations and pronoun review — Format Matters routine 55 1
3 What is a rhetorical device? Tier-2 Set 14 launch and the 5-device toolkit preview 55 1
4 PARALLELISM deep-dive — Lincoln Gettysburg, Chavez Wrath of Grapes, and the parallelism scaffold 60 2
5 ANAPHORA — King I Have a Dream, Nakate climate speech, Harjo poetry 60 2
6 ASYNDETON — Caesar Veni Vidi Vici, Murakami compressed style, and tricolon-asyndeton 55 2
7 Literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay launch — SOAP framework and the 4-paragraph structure (Lincoln Gettysburg) 60 1
8 Idiom analysis — cultural origin, literal vs. figurative, register, audience appropriateness 50 1
9 Literary-analysis essay drafting workshop — SOAP intro and device-body paragraphs 60 1
10 So-what conclusion + 3-pass revision Pass 1 CONTENT — literary-analysis essay 60 1
11 RHETORICAL QUESTION — Douglass Fourth of July, Adichie Single Story, Maathai Nobel 55 1
12 ANTITHESIS introduced — Kennedy Ask Not, King not-by-the-color, Morrison Nobel 55 2
13 Original argument with rhetorical devices launch — applying 3+ devices and the device-pass routine 60 1
14 Analogy completion (a:b::c:d) + original argument drafting workshop 60 2
15 Sentence rhythm + active/passive voice for effect — paramedic method routine 55 2
16 Pass 1 CONTENT peer revision — original argument (14 criteria) 60 2
17 Pass 2 SENTENCE-LEVEL peer revision — devices applied, voice, rhythm (10 criteria) 60 2
18 Pass 3 MECHANICS peer revision — pronouns, semicolons, colons (12 criteria) 60 4
19 Rhetorical-performance script preparation — device markings, audience-register, rehearsal 60 1
20 Rhetorician's Forum — oral performance of original argument with rhetorical devices 90 2

Skills (19)

Assessments (3)

  • Summative week 18 90 min covers 18 skills
  • Summative week 9 75 min covers 7 skills
  • Self Reflection Assessment As Learning ongoing — after literary-analysis essay (week 9) and after Rhetorician's Forum (week 18) 15 min covers 0 skills

Standards alignment

Framework
CCSS-ELA
W.6.1W.6.1.aW.6.1.bW.6.1.cW.6.1.dW.6.1.eW.6.2W.6.2.aW.6.2.bW.6.2.cW.6.2.dW.6.2.e + 35 more
Framework
English National Curriculum
Y6 V/G/P: using semi-colons, colons...Y6 V/G/P: using a colon to introduce a listY6 V/G/P: recognising vocabulary and...Y6 V/G/P: how words are related by...Y6 Composition: assessing the...Y6 Composition: ensuring the...KS3 Y7 Writing (stretch): write...KS3 Y7 Writing (stretch): drawing on...KS3 Y7 Reading (stretch): knowing...KS3 Y7 Spoken English (stretch):...
Framework
NCTE/IRA Standards
NCTE-3 Apply a wide range of...NCTE-4 Adjust use of spoken,...NCTE-5 Employ a wide range of...NCTE-6 Apply knowledge of language...NCTE-9 Develop an understanding of...NCTE-11 Participate as...NCTE-12 Use spoken, written, and...
Framework
CEFR (early literacy adaptation)
B1 Writing — can write...B1 Writing — can write short, simple...B1+ Writing — can develop an...B1+ Speaking — can give a prepared...B2 Writing (stretch) — can write an...B2 Speaking (stretch) — can give a...B2 Reading (stretch) — can recognise...

Pedagogical anchors

  • Graham & Perin 'Writing Next' (Carnegie Corporation 2007) — explicit strategy instruction (0.82); summarization (0.82); collaborative writing (0.75); specific product goals (0.70); word processing (0.55); sentence-combining (0.50); inquiry activities (0.32); pre-writing (0.32); study of models (0.25); writing for content learning (0.23). PRIMARY anchor at G6.
    Graham & Perin is the PRIMARY anchor. Explicit strategy instruction taught through (a) the rhetorical-devices planner (lesson 3 — RAVEN: Rhetorical-Aware Voice and Engagement Notation), (b) the 3-pass revision named-moves anchor (lessons 16-18 — content/sentence/mechanics), (c) the literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay scaffold (lessons 7-10). Collaborative writing via three-pass peer protocols in lessons 16-18 (CPR — Content, Punctuation, Refinement pass discipline replacing G6-fall's single SBAR). Sentence-combining drills via parallelism, anaphora, and tricolon construction in lessons 5-6, 11-12. Specific product goals: a 4-5 paragraph LITERARY ANALYSIS of rhetorical strategy in a mentor text (weeks 5-9) + a culminating ORIGINAL ARGUMENT with at least 4 named rhetorical devices applied (weeks 10-18). Study of models: 5 mentor speeches/essays read closely (Lincoln, King, Sotomayor, Adichie, Murakami). Word processing — typed publication default.
  • Aristotle's Rhetoric — three modes of persuasion (ETHOS, PATHOS, LOGOS) PLUS the rhetorical devices of his style: ANAPHORA (repetition at the start of successive clauses), PARALLELISM (matching grammatical structure), ASYNDETON (omission of conjunctions for compressed power), ANTITHESIS (juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in parallel structure), RHETORICAL QUESTION (a question posed for effect, not requiring an answer). At G6 these are taught as both reading-analysis tools and writing-craft moves.
    Ethos/pathos/logos extended from fall introduction to active application (lesson 1). Parallelism (lesson 4), anaphora (lesson 5), asyndeton (lesson 6), rhetorical question (lesson 11), antithesis intro (lesson 12) taught as named devices with: (a) reading-side identification in mentor texts, (b) writing-side construction in own drafts. Devices spiraled into final argumentative-revision in lessons 13-15.
  • The Writing Revolution / Hochman Method — sentence-level routines retained: SPO; conjunction-driven sentence stretching with 'because/but/so/although/however/whereas/since'; sentence-combining drills; embedded-quotation. At G6-spring Hochman is the engine for sentence-level rhetorical-device construction (parallelism = matching grammatical structure; tricolon = sentence combining of 3 short related sentences).
    Hochman sentence-combining is the workhorse for sentence-level rhetorical-device construction. Parallelism drill in lesson 4 uses Hochman sentence-combining (combine 3 sentences with matching verb forms into 1 parallel sentence). Tricolon drill in lesson 5. The 'although/but/however' Hochman triad applied to antithesis (lesson 12). Embedded-quotation continued from G6-fall with attention to how the quote's rhetorical-device choice affects the analysis.
  • Lucy Calkins' Units of Study — Grade 6 Literary Essay (entering analysis of rhetorical strategy) and Grade 6 Argument (Bend III — Presenting Positions). At G6-spring the workshop format runs two LONGER pieces with formal multi-pass revision discipline.
    Two-piece workshop arc: PIECE 1 = literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay (lessons 7-10 drafting); PIECE 2 = original argument with rhetorical devices applied (lessons 13-18 drafting and presenting). Calkins' 'writerly noticing' move applied to rhetorical-device study in mentor texts (lessons 1, 4-6, 11, 12).
  • Beck & McKeown 'Bringing Words to Life' — three-encounter Tier-2 vocabulary; G6-spring focuses on RHETORICAL and LITERARY-ANALYSIS precision words (rhetoric, device, parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, antithesis, tricolon, juxtaposition, register, audience, persona, tone, voice, rhythm, cadence — Tier-2 Set 14). Three-encounter pattern: introduce in reading model → use in writing → defend in oral presentation.
    Tier-2 Set 14 launches across lessons 1-12 with rhetorical-analysis precision words. Three-encounter pattern enforced through the literary-analysis essay (use in writing) and the culminating oral presentation (defend in speaking).
  • Lemov 'Teach Like a Champion 3.0' — discussion protocols including COLD CALL, TURN AND TALK, EVERYBODY WRITES, SHOW CALL, and the SBAR-extension three-pass peer protocol; FORMAT MATTERS technique for register/Standard English. Added at G6-spring for the peer-revision protocol discipline.
    Cold Call in mentor-text close-readings (lessons 1, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12) to ensure every student identifies the rhetorical device. Turn and Talk before every peer-revision pass (lessons 16-18). Show Call in lessons 9 and 17 — a chosen student's draft displayed for whole-class noticing. Format Matters for L.6.1.e Standard-English-variation work (lesson 2). Three-pass peer protocol scaffolded with Lemov's 'Right Is Right' discipline — partial answers extended, not accepted as final.
  • Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, Johnston 'Words Their Way' — Greek and Latin roots/affixes cumulative review at G6-spring (32-element fall toolkit maintained, no new roots added this term — focus shifts to MORPHOLOGY DRILLING and ANALOGY COMPLETION); idiom-analysis routine; analogy-completion sorts (synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category) per L.6.5.b.
    Morphology drill maintained in monthly Friday spiral (lessons distributed). Idiom-analysis routine in lesson 8 with cultural-origin notes (Tower of Babel, Achilles' heel, kicking the can — multi-cultural idiom palette). Analogy-completion sort in lesson 14 (a:b::c:d format).
  • Wineburg historical-thinking heuristics adapted to rhetorical analysis — SOURCING (who/when/audience), CONTEXTUALIZATION (rhetorical situation: speaker/audience/purpose/occasion — SOAP analysis adapted), CORROBORATION (how does this rhetoric compare to other rhetoric on the same issue).
    SOAP framework (Speaker/Occasion/Audience/Purpose) for rhetorical-analysis essay (lesson 7). Sourcing in mentor-text introductions (every rhetorical-device lesson: who is speaking, when, to whom). Corroboration in lesson 13 (compare King's anaphora to Lincoln's anaphora — same device, different historical moment).
  • Routman 'Writing Essentials' and Atwell 'In the Middle' — workshop format extended to MULTI-WEEK pieces; Atwell's 'minilesson + work time + share' shape. Spring extends fall's 6-stage cycle (PLAN-RESEARCH-DRAFT-REVISE-PEER-EDIT-PUBLISH) with FORMAL 3-PASS REVISION inserted between DRAFT and PEER-EDIT.
    6-stage workshop continues from fall with the addition of a formal 3-PASS REVISION discipline. Each pass has its own rubric, anchor, and named moves (Pass 1 CONTENT — anchor MG-21; Pass 2 SENTENCE — anchor MG-22; Pass 3 MECHANICS — anchor MG-23). Replaces fall's single-pass SBAR.
  • Strunk & White 'The Elements of Style' and Lanham 'Revising Prose' — Lanham's PARAMEDIC METHOD for converting passive-zombie prose into active-agent prose (find the action; find the actor; put actor first; convert verb-noun to verb; cut prepositions). Used in lesson 2 (active/passive for effect) and lesson 17 (Pass 2 sentence-level revision).
    Paramedic Method applied as the sentence-revision routine in lesson 17 (Pass 2). Active/passive choice taught in lesson 2 with worked examples: active for agent-foregrounding, passive for agent-obscuring (scientific writing, when actor is unknown, or for rhythm).
  • Christensen 'Reading, Writing, and Rising Up' and Bomer & Bomer 'For a Better World' — argumentative writing as civic agency; rhetorical devices as tools historically used in liberation movements; culturally diverse mentor argument texts.
    Mentor speech corpus includes King 'I Have a Dream' (anaphora; antithesis), Sotomayor commencement (parallelism), Adichie 'Danger of a Single Story' (rhetorical question), Murakami Nobel (asyndeton/cadence), Cesar Chavez 'Wrath of Grapes' speech (parallelism, ethos), Wangari Maathai Nobel lecture (rhetorical question, parallelism), Vanessa Nakate climate speech (anaphora). Students see rhetorical devices as tools across cultures, eras, and causes.
  • Janet Allen & Robert Marzano — academic vocabulary instruction with sentence-frame scaffolding for rhetorical analysis ('The writer uses ___ to ___'; 'By repeating ___, the writer creates ___'; 'The parallel structure ___ emphasizes ___').
    Sentence-frames embedded in every literary-analysis lesson (7-10) and in peer-revision protocols (16-18). Rhetorical-analysis frames in MG-9 anchor.
  • Probst & Beers 'Notice and Note Nonfiction Signposts' — Contrasts and Contradictions; Extreme or Absolute Language; Quoted Words; Word Gaps. Applied to rhetorical-device identification in mentor texts.
    Nonfiction Signposts as rhetorical-device-finding routine. 'Extreme or Absolute Language' overlaps with ETHOS exaggeration. 'Contrasts and Contradictions' overlaps with ANTITHESIS. Used as a starter scaffold in lessons 4-6, 11-12 before more advanced device-naming.
  • Keyboarding / Typed Publication — Grade 6 assumes keyboarding fluency. The published literary-analysis and argument essays are typed by default; handwritten optional only for IEP/504.
    Keyboarding maintenance drill once weekly (10 min) continues from fall. Typed publication default for both pieces.

Depth bar

Covers
CCSS
L.6.1.e
recognize variations from standard English in own and others' writing/speaking; identify strategies to improve expression in conventional language
L.6.1.a-d
pronoun review
L.6.2.a
continued nonrestrictive elements
L.6.2.b
SEMICOLON FOR COMPOUND SENTENCES and COLON FOR LISTS (extending fall semicolon introduction to systematic teaching)
L.6.3.a
vary sentence patterns for meaning, reader/listener interest, and style — extended to include PARALLEL STRUCTURE and ACTIVE/PASSIVE VOICE for effect
L.6.3.b
maintain consistency in style and tone — deepened to include voice-for-effect choices
L.6.4.a-d
context clues; affixes/roots cumulative review; reference materials; verify meaning
L.6.5.a
figures of speech — IDIOM ANALYSIS as new G6-spring focus
L.6.5.b
word relationships — DENOTATION/CONNOTATION distinction deepened; synonyms/antonyms/analogies; part/whole/cause-effect/item-category
L.6.5.c
connotation gradient continued
L.6.6
Tier-2 Set 14 rhetorical/literary-analysis vocabulary
SL.6.4
present claims/findings with appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, clear pronunciation — extended with rhetorical devices
SL.6.5
multimedia components and visual displays in presentations
SL.6.6
adapt speech to context and task — register for audience
W.6.2.a-f
informative/explanatory: literary-analysis essay analyzing rhetorical strategy in a mentor text
W.6.5
with guidance and support, develop and strengthen writing by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach — formal MULTI-PASS protocols
W.6.6
use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to collaborate with others — typed final
W.6.9.a-b
draw evidence from literary/informational texts
RI.6.4
determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings — applied to rhetorical analysis
RI.6.6
determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed — applied to rhetorical analysis
RI.6.8
trace and evaluate the argument — applied to rhetorical analysis, IN FULL
Exceeds

CCSS by formally teaching SIX NAMED RHETORICAL DEVICES — ETHOS/PATHOS/LOGOS application (extending fall introduction), PARALLELISM (CCSS L.6.1.e applied), ANAPHORA, ASYNDETON, RHETORICAL QUESTION, and ANTITHESIS (introduced) — as both READING-analysis tools (RI.6.4, RI.6.6, RI.6.8) and WRITING-craft moves (W.6.1.a-e revision); by teaching ACTIVE vs. PASSIVE VOICE FOR EFFECT as a named craft choice (L.6.3.a stretch — passive voice is not banned but deliberately chosen for agent-obscuring, scientific objectivity, or rhythm); by teaching SENTENCE RHYTHM with short-sentence-for-emphasis, long-sentence-for-development, and tricolon (3-part parallel) — extending G6-fall's 6-pattern sentence variation toolkit; by deepening L.6.2 punctuation to SEMICOLON FOR COMPOUND SENTENCES (3 rules — independent clauses joined; before transitions like 'however / therefore / moreover / nevertheless' with comma after; in complex lists with internal commas) and COLON FOR LISTS AND APPOSITIVES (4 rules — to introduce a list, to introduce an appositive, before a quotation, between two independent clauses where the second explains the first); by establishing FORMAL MULTI-PASS PEER REVISION PROTOCOLS — Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience), Pass 2 SENTENCE-LEVEL (rhetorical devices applied; voice; rhythm; parallelism), Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronouns; punctuation; spelling) — extending G6-fall's single SBAR protocol into a three-stage discipline with named rubric per pass; by extending workshop with LONGER multi-week pieces (4-6 weeks per piece, two pieces over the term: a literary-analysis essay analyzing rhetorical strategy in a mentor text + a culminating original argument with rhetorical devices applied); by deepening L.6.5.a FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE with systematic IDIOM ANALYSIS (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative meaning, register, audience appropriateness) and L.6.5.b WORD RELATIONSHIPS through formal ANALOGY-COMPLETION routines (a:b::c:d — part/whole, synonym/antonym, cause/effect, item/category); by deepening reference-material literacy to include LATIN/GREEK ETYMOLOGY look-up as a default routine; by introducing PUBLIC-SPEAKING AS RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE (SL.6.4-6 stretch) — the culminating piece is PRESENTED with rhetorical devices marked in the script (anaphora highlighted, rhetorical questions paused for, parallelism emphasized) and audience-attuned voice/pace; by formally distinguishing DENOTATION (dictionary meaning) from CONNOTATION (associations) as separate L.6.5.b/c lessons before integration; by introducing the LITERARY-ANALYSIS-OF-RHETORIC essay as a new genre (W.6.2.a-f informative/explanatory applied to RI.6.4-6-8 rhetorical analysis) — students read a mentor argument (Lincoln's Gettysburg Address; King's I Have a Dream; Sotomayor commencement; Adichie 'Danger of a Single Story'; Murakami Nobel speech) and write a 4-5 paragraph essay analyzing HOW the writer uses rhetorical devices for argumentative effect