eng.g6.s
Grade 6 Spring — Rhetorical Devices, Sentence Craft, and Formal Multi-Pass Peer Revision Protocols
Overview
Grade 6 Spring is the term children become RHETORICIANS — writers and speakers who understand and deploy the named devices that make arguments memorable and persuasive. Building on G6-fall's argumentative-writing foundation, students learn to identify, analyze, and apply six rhetorical devices in close reading of mentor speeches and in their own composition. Eight intertwined threads run across 18 weeks.
-
01RHETORICAL DEVICES
are the PRIMARY CRAFT ARC — six named devices taught with reading-side identification AND writing-side construction: ETHOS/PATHOS/LOGOS (applied — extending fall introduction); PARALLELISM (matching grammatical structure across phrases/clauses); ANAPHORA (repetition at the start of successive clauses — 'I have a dream that ___'); ASYNDETON (omission of conjunctions for compressed power — 'I came, I saw, I conquered'); RHETORICAL QUESTION (a question posed for effect — 'What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?'); ANTITHESIS introduced (juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in parallel structure — 'not the color of skin but the content of character'). Each device is taught through a mentor speech, identified in a close reading, and then constructed in students' own writing.
-
02SENTENCE-LEVEL CRAFT
extends G6-fall's 6-pattern sentence variation toolkit with PARALLEL STRUCTURE (CCSS L.6.1.e applied — matching grammatical forms in a series), ACTIVE vs. PASSIVE VOICE for effect (passive is not banned but deliberately chosen for agent-obscuring/scientific objectivity/rhythm — taught via Lanham's Paramedic Method), and SENTENCE RHYTHM (short-sentence-for-emphasis, long-sentence-for-development, tricolon 3-part parallel).
-
03GRAMMAR REVIEW
continues L.6.1 pronoun mastery from fall (case, intensive, consistency, vague antecedents, Standard-English variations) — review and integration only, not new acquisition.
-
04PUNCTUATION DEEPER
(L.6.2.a continued) introduces SEMICOLON FOR COMPOUND SENTENCES with 3 rules (independent clauses joined without conjunction; before conjunctive adverbs like 'however/therefore' with comma after; in lists with internal commas) and COLON FOR LISTS AND APPOSITIVES with 4 rules (introduce a list; introduce an appositive; before a quotation; between two independent clauses where the second explains the first).
-
05L.6.3.a SENTENCE VARIATION
continued; L.6.3.b CONSISTENCY IN STYLE AND TONE deepened — voice-for-effect choices examined in mentor texts and in own drafts.
-
06FORMAL MULTI-PASS PEER REVISION PROTOCOLS
replace G6-fall's single-pass SBAR with a three-stage discipline — Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience — 14 criteria), Pass 2 SENTENCE-LEVEL (rhetorical devices applied; active/passive choice; rhythm; parallelism — 10 criteria), Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronoun mastery; semicolon/colon; comma rules; spelling — 12 criteria). Each pass has its own rubric and named moves.
-
07L.6.4-6 VOCABULARY
continues at G6 as primary focus: IDIOM ANALYSIS (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative meaning, register, audience appropriateness — L.6.5.a), DENOTATION/CONNOTATION distinction deepened (L.6.5.b/c — separately taught before integration), WORD RELATIONSHIPS through ANALOGY COMPLETION (a:b::c:d format with 4 relation types — synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category — L.6.5.b), REFERENCE-MATERIAL LITERACY for etymology look-up as default routine (L.6.4.c-d), Tier-2 Set 14 rhetorical/literary-analysis precision (15 words: rhetoric, device, parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, antithesis, tricolon, juxtaposition, register, audience, persona, tone, voice, rhythm, cadence).
-
08LITERARY-ANALYSIS STRETCH GENRE
students write a 4-5 paragraph literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay (W.6.2.a-f informative/explanatory applied to RI.6.4-6-8 rhetorical analysis) analyzing HOW a mentor writer uses rhetorical devices for argumentative effect. SOAP framework (Speaker/Occasion/Audience/Purpose) anchors the introduction. The essay teaches the reading-writing link — close-reading-as-warrant for an argumentative interpretation.
-
09PUBLIC SPEAKING AS RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE
SL.6.4-6 extended. The culminating piece is PRESENTED with rhetorical devices marked in the script (anaphora highlighted, rhetorical questions paused for, parallelism emphasized) and audience-attuned voice and pace. The term closes with the RHETORICIAN'S FORUM — a classroom-wide oral-performance event where each child presents their argument with at least 3 named rhetorical devices identified and marked in the delivery script.
Essential questions
- What is a RHETORICAL DEVICE — and how does it differ from a FIGURE OF SPEECH or a GRAMMAR RULE?
- What is PARALLELISM — and why does matching grammatical structure create emphasis, balance, and memorability?
- What is ANAPHORA — and what is the effect of repeating the same words at the start of successive clauses?
- What is ASYNDETON — and how does removing conjunctions change the rhythm and intensity of a sentence?
- What is a RHETORICAL QUESTION — and why is a question that doesn't expect an answer sometimes more persuasive than a statement?
- What is ANTITHESIS — and why does setting two contrasting ideas in parallel structure create such a powerful claim?
- How does ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS (introduced in fall) shape an arguer's choice of rhetorical device for a specific audience?
- What is the difference between ACTIVE and PASSIVE voice — and when should a writer choose passive deliberately rather than by accident?
- What is sentence RHYTHM — and how do short sentences for emphasis, long sentences for development, and tricolons (3-part parallel) shape a reader's experience?
- When do I use a SEMICOLON vs. a COLON vs. a COMMA — and what are the 3 semicolon rules and 4 colon rules?
- What is the difference between DENOTATION (dictionary meaning) and CONNOTATION (associations) — and why does it matter for word choice in argument?
- What is an IDIOM — and how do I analyze it (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative, register, audience appropriateness)?
- What is an ANALOGY — and how do the 4 relation types (synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category) help me understand word relationships?
- What are the THREE PASSES of formal peer revision — CONTENT, SENTENCE, MECHANICS — and what is each pass FOR?
- How does a writer PERFORM their argument orally — and how do device markings in the script (anaphora highlight, rhetorical-question pause, parallelism emphasis) shape the delivery?
Enduring understandings
- A RHETORICAL DEVICE is a NAMED PATTERN of language deliberately deployed for argumentative effect. Unlike a figure of speech (which describes how meaning works) or a grammar rule (which describes what is correct), a rhetorical device is a CHOICE about how to ARRANGE language for impact.
- PARALLELISM — matching grammatical structure across phrases or clauses — creates balance, emphasis, and memorability. The mismatch ('to read, to write, and writing speeches') breaks the pattern and loses the effect.
- ANAPHORA — repetition at the start of successive clauses — accumulates emotional and logical force. Each repetition raises the stakes; departure from the pattern signals climax.
- ASYNDETON — omission of conjunctions — compresses energy. 'I came, I saw, I conquered' is faster, more decisive, and more memorable than 'I came AND I saw AND I conquered.'
- A RHETORICAL QUESTION poses a question whose answer the speaker assumes the audience already shares — used to engage, provoke, or make the audience feel they have reached the conclusion themselves.
- ANTITHESIS sets two contrasting ideas in parallel grammatical structure ('not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character'). The parallel structure makes the contrast inescapable.
- ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS (Aristotle's three modes) shape the arguer's choice of device. Ethos-heavy arguments rely on speaker credibility; pathos-heavy on emotional appeal; logos-heavy on reasoning. Most strong arguments balance all three.
- ACTIVE voice foregrounds the agent ('Maya wrote the essay'). PASSIVE voice obscures or backgrounds the agent ('The essay was written'). Passive is appropriate for scientific objectivity, when the actor is unknown, or for deliberate rhythmic effect — never by accident.
- Sentence RHYTHM shapes meaning: short sentences for emphasis ('Stop. Listen.'); long sentences for development with embedded clauses; tricolons (3-part parallel) for memorable closure ('government of the people, by the people, for the people').
- The SEMICOLON joins two independent clauses without a conjunction (Rule 1); appears before a conjunctive adverb like 'however / therefore' with a comma after (Rule 2); separates items in a complex list with internal commas (Rule 3). The COLON introduces a list (Rule 1); introduces an appositive (Rule 2); precedes a quotation (Rule 3); joins two independent clauses where the second explains the first (Rule 4).
- DENOTATION is the dictionary meaning of a word; CONNOTATION is the cultural and emotional association it carries. 'House' and 'home' have similar denotations but very different connotations.
- An IDIOM is a fixed phrase whose meaning is not the sum of its words. Idioms carry CULTURAL ORIGIN (where the phrase came from), LITERAL vs. FIGURATIVE meaning, REGISTER (formal/informal), and AUDIENCE APPROPRIATENESS (some idioms travel across cultures; others do not).
- An ANALOGY in a:b::c:d format reveals one of four RELATION TYPES: synonym/antonym (hot:cold::up:down), part/whole (finger:hand::petal:flower), cause/effect (rain:flood::study:knowledge), item/category (rose:flower::oak:tree). Naming the relation is how you complete the analogy.
- FORMAL PEER REVISION proceeds in THREE PASSES: Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience — does the argument hold up?); Pass 2 SENTENCE (rhetorical devices applied; voice; rhythm; parallelism — is the language doing rhetorical work?); Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronouns; punctuation; spelling — are the conventions clean?). Doing all three at once is worse than doing each well. Each pass has its own rubric and its own attention.
- Public speaking is RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE. A script with devices marked — anaphora highlighted for stress, rhetorical questions marked for pause, parallelism underlined for emphasis — directs the delivery. The script and the voice work together; neither is sufficient alone.
Visual reference library 36 assets
MG-1
Illustration
Physical / non-image
Unit-opener: a Grade-6 rhetorician at a workshop table with a mentor speech (King 'I Have a Dream') open with passages highlighted (anaphora in red, parallelism in blue, rhetorical question in purple), an MG-7 rhetorical-devices reference card to the side, a typed literary-analysis essay draft with device markings, a SOAP analysis grid (Speaker/Occasion/Audience/Purpose), a 3-pass peer-revision rubric on the wall (Pass 1 Content purple / Pass 2 Sentence blue / Pass 3 Mechanics green), a presentation script with devices color-coded for delivery, a wall display behind showing the FIVE NAMED RHETORICAL DEVICES (parallelism=blue, anaphora=red, asyndeton=orange, rhetorical question=purple, antithesis=green) plus ETHOS-PATHOS-LOGOS retained from fall, plus the semicolon-and-colon rule card. Style: warm watercolor, multicultural middle-school classroom, eye-level shot, dyslexic-friendly classroom labels visible. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-2
Chart
Rhetorical-devices master anchor: 6-band stacked card with each device labeled and color-coded. PARALLELISM (blue) — matching grammatical structure; example: 'We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields' (Churchill). ANAPHORA (red) — repetition at start of successive clauses; example: 'I have a dream that... I have a dream that... I have a dream that...' (King). ASYNDETON (orange) — omission of conjunctions; example: 'I came, I saw, I conquered' (Caesar). RHETORICAL QUESTION (purple) — question for effect; example: 'What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?' (Douglass). ANTITHESIS (green) — contrast in parallel structure; example: 'Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country' (Kennedy). ETHOS/PATHOS/LOGOS (gold, retained from fall) — the three modes of persuasion. Bottom rule: 'These are tools — use them deliberately, for effect.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-3
Chart
Parallelism anchor (L.6.1.e applied): 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'When you list items or ideas, match their grammatical form.' BAND 2 — RIGHT vs. WRONG examples: RIGHT 'She likes reading, writing, and hiking.' (all gerunds) WRONG 'She likes reading, writing, and to hike.' (gerund-gerund-infinitive — broken). RIGHT 'We came to learn, to teach, and to lead.' (all infinitives). WRONG 'We came to learn, to teach, and leading.' (broken). BAND 3 — WORKED EXAMPLES from mentor texts: 'Government OF the people, BY the people, FOR the people.' (Lincoln — parallel prepositional phrases). 'Not by the COLOR of their skin BUT by the CONTENT of their character.' (King — parallel + antithesis). 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' (Caesar — parallel + asyndeton). Print-ready 11x17.
MG-4
Chart
Anaphora anchor: 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'Repeat the same words or phrase at the START of successive clauses or sentences.' BAND 2 — EFFECT: 'Each repetition raises the emotional and logical stakes. Breaking the pattern signals climax.' BAND 3 — WORKED EXAMPLES: King 'I have a dream that... I have a dream that... I have a dream today.' (4 anaphoras; break on final = climax). Vanessa Nakate 'I speak for the children... I speak for the farmers... I speak for the future.' Lincoln 'we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground.' Bottom: 'Try 3 anaphoras minimum; the 4th can break for emphasis.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-5
Chart
Asyndeton anchor: 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'OMIT the conjunctions (and/but/or) in a list of three or more items.' BAND 2 — EFFECT: 'Creates compressed, decisive, urgent rhythm. Speed over emphasis.' BAND 3 — COMPARISON: WITH conjunctions (polysyndeton or normal): 'I came AND I saw AND I conquered.' (slower, additive). WITHOUT (asyndeton): 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' (faster, decisive). Murakami example: 'The wall, the egg, the silence.' Bottom rule: 'Asyndeton signals urgency or decisiveness. Use sparingly — the effect depends on rarity.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-6
Chart
Rhetorical question anchor: 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'Pose a question to which you do NOT expect an answer — you want the audience to feel they have arrived at the answer themselves.' BAND 2 — EFFECT: 'Engages audience as co-thinker. More persuasive than a flat statement.' BAND 3 — WORKED EXAMPLES: Douglass 'What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?' (title is a rhetorical question — the listener feels the answer). Adichie 'How many stories must we hear before we believe the danger of a single story?' Wangari Maathai 'Are we not all children of this earth?' Bottom: '5 starter stems — How can we ___? Who among us ___? What does it mean to ___? Is this not ___? When will we ___?' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-7
Chart
Antithesis anchor (introduction): 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'Set two CONTRASTING ideas in PARALLEL grammatical structure. Antithesis = parallelism + contrast.' BAND 2 — EFFECT: 'The parallel structure makes the contrast inescapable and memorable.' BAND 3 — WORKED EXAMPLES: Kennedy 'Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.' (parallel imperative + contrast). Lincoln 'The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.' (parallel verbs + contrast). King 'not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.' (parallel prepositional phrase + contrast). Bottom rule: 'Antithesis = parallel structure on a contrast. Both halves must match grammatically.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-8
Chart
Active vs. passive voice anchor (L.6.3.a): 3-band card. BAND 1 — RULE: 'ACTIVE = subject does the verb (Maya wrote the essay). PASSIVE = subject receives the verb (The essay was written by Maya / The essay was written).' BAND 2 — WHEN TO USE PASSIVE DELIBERATELY: (a) AGENT UNKNOWN — 'The window was broken' (we don't know who). (b) SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY — 'The mixture was heated to 100°C' (focus on process). (c) AGENT-OBSCURING for argument — 'Mistakes were made' (politician avoiding blame — a rhetorical move). (d) RHYTHM — to vary sentence opening when needed. BAND 3 — PARAMEDIC METHOD (Lanham): 5 steps to convert passive-zombie to active-agent: 1. Find the action. 2. Find the actor. 3. Put actor first. 4. Convert verb-noun ('made a decision' → 'decided'). 5. Cut prepositions. Bottom rule: 'Default to active for vigor. Choose passive deliberately when one of the 4 reasons applies.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-9
Chart
Sentence rhythm anchor: 3-band card. BAND 1 — SHORT for emphasis: 'Stop. Listen. This matters.' (3 short sentences = stop-and-attention). BAND 2 — LONG for development: 'When the bell rang at the end of the long day, after the test had been collected and the desks had been straightened and the lights had been dimmed, Maya finally exhaled.' (1 long sentence = sustained, accumulating). BAND 3 — TRICOLON (3-part parallel) for memorable closure: 'government of the people, by the people, for the people' (Lincoln). 'Veni, vidi, vici.' (Caesar). 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' Bottom rule: 'Vary the lengths. A paragraph of all-medium sentences puts readers to sleep. A short sentence after a long one = emphasis.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-10
Chart
Semicolon rules anchor (L.6.2.b): 3-rule card. RULE 1 — JOIN two independent clauses without a conjunction: 'Maya brought cookies; Sara brought juice.' (Both halves are complete sentences.) RULE 2 — BEFORE a conjunctive adverb (however/therefore/moreover/nevertheless/consequently/thus) joining two independent clauses, with COMMA after the adverb: 'Maya brought cookies; however, Sara forgot the juice.' RULE 3 — In a COMPLEX LIST where items already contain commas: 'The trip stopped in Boston, Massachusetts; New Haven, Connecticut; and Princeton, New Jersey.' Bottom: 'A semicolon is stronger than a comma but weaker than a period. Use it to show two ideas are closely related but each could stand alone.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-11
Chart
Colon rules anchor (L.6.2.b): 4-rule card. RULE 1 — Introduce a LIST: 'Bring three items: a pencil, a notebook, and an open mind.' RULE 2 — Introduce an APPOSITIVE (a name or summary of what came before): 'There is only one rule: respect.' RULE 3 — Before a QUOTATION (especially a formal or long one): 'Lincoln declared: "government of the people, by the people, for the people."' RULE 4 — Between TWO INDEPENDENT CLAUSES where the second EXPLAINS or AMPLIFIES the first: 'Maya knew the answer: she had practiced every night.' Bottom rule: 'A colon promises: 'something explanatory is coming.' Whatever follows must deliver on that promise.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-12
Chart
Denotation vs. connotation anchor (L.6.5.b/c): 2-column card. DENOTATION (left, gray) = DICTIONARY meaning: 'a place where someone lives.' Words with same denotation: house, home, residence, dwelling, abode. CONNOTATION (right, colored) = CULTURAL/EMOTIONAL associations: HOUSE (neutral — a building), HOME (warm — family/safety/belonging), RESIDENCE (formal/cold — legal or distant), DWELLING (literary/old — fairy tale or technical), ABODE (humorous or archaic — 'my humble abode'). Bottom rule: 'Choose deliberately. The connotation is what your reader FEELS about the word, even when the denotation is the same.' Worked example with the gradient: 'thin' (slender = positive; emaciated = negative; both denote 'lacking weight'). Print-ready 11x17.
MG-13
Chart
Idiom-analysis anchor (L.6.5.a): 4-field card. FIELD 1 — IDIOM phrase ('kick the bucket'). FIELD 2 — LITERAL meaning ('to physically kick a pail'). FIELD 3 — FIGURATIVE meaning ('to die'). FIELD 4 — CULTURAL ORIGIN (debated — possibly from medieval hanging or slaughterhouse; mostly British/American English). FIELD 5 — REGISTER (informal, can be flippant). FIELD 6 — AUDIENCE APPROPRIATENESS (NOT for formal writing; consider whether the topic of death is appropriate to the audience). Worked examples for: Achilles' heel (Greek myth — vulnerability), break the ice (medieval — to start a conversation), the apple of his eye (Old English — favorite), kick the can down the road (American — postpone), spill the beans (American — reveal a secret), tower of Babel (Hebrew Bible — confused communication). Bottom rule: 'Idioms carry culture. Before using, check origin, register, and audience.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-14
Chart
Analogy-completion anchor (L.6.5.b): 4-relation card. RELATION 1 — SYNONYM/ANTONYM: 'big:large::small:tiny' (synonym); 'hot:cold::up:down' (antonym). RELATION 2 — PART/WHOLE: 'finger:hand::petal:flower'; 'page:book::brick:wall'. RELATION 3 — CAUSE/EFFECT: 'rain:flood::study:knowledge'; 'fire:smoke::practice:skill'. RELATION 4 — ITEM/CATEGORY: 'rose:flower::oak:tree'; 'tuna:fish::sparrow:bird'. STEP-BY-STEP method to complete an analogy: 1. NAME the relation between a and b (e.g., 'part/whole'). 2. APPLY same relation between c and d. 3. CHECK reversibility (does b:a::d:c also work?). Bottom: 'Analogy is the workhorse of word-relationship vocabulary. Naming the relation IS the answer.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-15
Chart
Tier-2 Set 14 rhetorical/literary-analysis vocabulary anchor: 15-word grid. WORDS: rhetoric, device, parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, antithesis, tricolon, juxtaposition, register, audience, persona, tone, voice, rhythm, cadence. Each cell: word + 1-sentence definition + example-of-use-in-rhetorical-analysis ('The writer's use of anaphora creates ___'; 'The rhetorical device of ___ emphasizes ___'; 'The juxtaposition of ___ with ___ reveals ___'). Print-ready 11x17, dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-16
Chart
3-pass peer-revision protocol anchor: 3-band stacked card. PASS 1 — CONTENT (purple, 14 criteria — extends fall MG-21): claim arguable / evidence credible / warrant explained / audience considered / counterclaim addressed / structure follows MPO / introduction hooks / conclusion synthesizes. PASS 2 — SENTENCE-LEVEL (blue, 10 criteria — NEW at G6-spring): parallelism applied / anaphora applied / 1 more device applied / active voice default / passive used only deliberately / sentence rhythm varied (short-long mix) / tricolon present somewhere / sentence openings varied / no unnecessary 'there is/are' / no 'be-verb' overuse. PASS 3 — MECHANICS (green, 12 criteria — NEW at G6-spring): pronoun case correct / intensive pronouns correct / pronoun consistency / vague-pronoun antecedents clear / semicolon used correctly (at least once) / colon used correctly (at least once) / commas for nonrestrictive / commas in compound sentences / spelling clean / capitalization clean / quotation punctuation / italics for titles. Bottom rule: 'ONE PASS AT A TIME. Doing all three at once is worse than doing each well.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-17
Chart
SOAP framework anchor (for rhetorical analysis): 4-field card. SPEAKER (S) — Who is speaking? What is their credibility/persona/role? OCCASION (O) — When and where is the speech given? What was happening at the time? AUDIENCE (A) — Who is listening? What do they know, value, fear? PURPOSE (P) — What is the speaker trying to achieve? Inform / persuade / commemorate / inspire / mobilize? Worked example for King 'I Have a Dream': S = MLK, civil rights leader, Baptist minister, age 34; O = 28 August 1963 March on Washington at Lincoln Memorial; A = 250,000 marchers, national TV audience, US government; P = to mobilize support for civil rights legislation and to articulate the moral case for racial equality. Bottom: 'SOAP analysis precedes device analysis. Devices serve purpose for audience.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-18
Chart
Literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay structure anchor: 4-paragraph (or 5-paragraph) card. PARAGRAPH 1 — INTRODUCTION with SOAP intro: name the speech, the speaker, the occasion, the audience, the purpose. State your THESIS — 'In [speech title], [speaker] uses [device 1], [device 2], and [device 3] to [achieve purpose].' PARAGRAPHS 2-3 (or 2-4) — DEVICE-ANALYSIS bodies: each body paragraph analyzes ONE device. TOPIC SENTENCE names the device + claim about its effect. EVIDENCE = an embedded quotation showing the device in action. WARRANT = explanation of HOW the device serves the speaker's purpose. PARAGRAPH 4 (or 5) — SO-WHAT CONCLUSION: synthesize — what does the writer's rhetorical choice reveal about their argument's strategy? Bottom: 'You are analyzing HOW the writer argues, not WHAT they argue. Stay close to the language.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-19
Chart
Rhetorical-performance script template: a presentation-script page with device-highlighting key. KEY (bottom): anaphora = YELLOW highlight; rhetorical question = PURPLE highlight + [PAUSE] marker; parallelism = BLUE underline; antithesis = GREEN highlight; asyndeton = ORANGE marks between items; stress = BOLD; pause = / mark. Worked sample: 'We will not stand by. We will not turn away. We will not be silent. [PAUSE — anaphora climax.] These children, these schools, these futures: they belong to all of us. [Tricolon — asyndeton.] Are we not their advocates? [Rhetorical question — PAUSE for 1 beat.]' Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-20
Video
Physical / non-image
5:00 model of a Grade-6 rhetorician analyzing King's 'I Have a Dream' for rhetorical devices: child reads paragraph 14 ('I have a dream that one day...'), identifies ANAPHORA (highlight in red), names the effect (accumulating force as each clause builds the vision), identifies PARALLELISM (same grammatical structure across the four 'I have a dream that' clauses — highlight in blue), identifies ANTITHESIS later in the speech ('not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character' — highlight in green). Voiceover narration explains: 'King repeats I have a dream that to build emotional momentum. Each repetition raises the stakes. By the fourth repetition the audience is leaning in. Then he varies the pattern with a longer image — that's the climax.' Multicultural child voice. Caption track on.
MG-21
Video
Physical / non-image
5:00 model of a Grade-6 three-pass peer-revision conference. 0:00-1:30 PASS 1 CONTENT — partner reads the draft cold, names whether the claim is arguable, whether the evidence supports it, whether the warrant explains. Quotes a line. Uses MG-16 Pass 1 checklist. 1:30-3:00 PASS 2 SENTENCE — partner re-reads looking for rhetorical devices applied. Highlights anaphora in red, parallelism in blue. Suggests one more device to add. Uses MG-16 Pass 2 checklist. 3:00-5:00 PASS 3 MECHANICS — partner re-reads with proofing eye. Catches a pronoun-case slip, a missing semicolon between two independent clauses, and a vague pronoun. Uses MG-16 Pass 3 checklist. Closing 30 seconds: writer summarizes top revision target from EACH pass. Real-feel middle-school classroom.
MG-22
Video
Physical / non-image
4:00 model of a Grade-6 rhetorical performance. Child stands at podium, holds a printed script with devices color-coded per MG-19. Delivers a 90-second excerpt of their original argument. Anaphora moments (yellow highlights) delivered with rising voice. Rhetorical questions (purple) followed by deliberate 1-beat pauses. Parallelism (blue underline) emphasized with parallel hand gesture. Tricolon delivered as climax. Voiceover/teacher narration off-screen names what the student is doing: 'Notice the pause after the rhetorical question — she lets the audience feel they've answered it themselves.' Multicultural classroom. Audience visible reacting (nodding, leaning in).
MG-23
Chart
Rhetorician's Forum publication planning poster: 3-section card. TOP: published 4-5 paragraph literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay with device-identification highlights (anaphora red, parallelism blue, asyndeton orange, rhetorical question purple, antithesis green) PLUS a 5-6 paragraph original argument with at least 3 rhetorical devices applied (same color key) PLUS works-cited list. MIDDLE: rhetorical-performance script with device-marking key (per MG-19). BOTTOM: oral-presentation plan (90-second performance + 30-second Q&A on chosen device — 'why did you use anaphora here, and what effect were you going for?'). Each child gets tri-fold display board. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-24
Chart
Physical / non-image
Status-of-class spring chart (workshop): 7 stages — PLAN | RESEARCH | DRAFT | DEVICE-PASS | PASS-1 CONTENT | PASS-2 SENTENCE | PASS-3 MECHANICS | PUBLISH. Each child has a magnetic name-tile moved into the column. Each column has 1-sentence definition and icon (PLAN = planner; RESEARCH = magnifying glass; DRAFT = pencil; DEVICE-PASS = rhetorical-device wheel; PASS-1 = purple checklist; PASS-2 = blue checklist; PASS-3 = green checklist; PUBLISH = laptop + audience). Print-ready 18x24. Note: DEVICE-PASS is a self-revision step before peer revision.
MG-25
Chart
Cross-cultural mentor-speech corpus map: a world map with 15 pins marking each mentor speaker's origin and a small portrait + speech title at each pin. Lincoln (Illinois USA, Gettysburg Address). King (Georgia/Alabama USA, I Have a Dream). Sotomayor (Bronx NYC, Princeton commencement). Adichie (Enugu Nigeria, Danger of a Single Story TED). Murakami (Tokyo Japan, Jerusalem Prize speech). Chavez (Yuma Arizona, Wrath of Grapes). Maathai (Nyeri Kenya, Nobel lecture). Nakate (Kampala Uganda, UN climate speech). Douglass (Maryland USA, Fourth of July). Yousafzai (Mingora Pakistan, Nobel lecture). Morrison (Lorain Ohio USA, Nobel lecture). Senesh (Budapest Hungary, Blessed Is the Match). Frank (Frankfurt/Amsterdam, Diary). Harjo (Tulsa Oklahoma USA, Poet Laureate). Park (Illinois USA, Newbery acceptance). Bottom rule: 'Rhetorical devices are tools used across cultures, eras, and causes.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-26
Chart
Cumulative pronoun/punctuation review anchor: 1-page review of G6-fall mechanics. PRONOUN CASE (3 cases — subjective/objective/possessive — refer to fall MG-7). INTENSIVE vs. REFLEXIVE (refer to fall MG-8). PRONOUN CONSISTENCY (number/person — refer to fall MG-9). VAGUE PRONOUNS (this/that/which/it antecedents — refer to fall MG-10). NONRESTRICTIVE ELEMENTS (commas/parentheses/dashes — refer to fall MG-11). SEMICOLON 3 rules (new this term — refer to MG-10). COLON 4 rules (new this term — refer to MG-11). Print-ready 8.5x11 single-sided spring review.
MG-27
Chart
Reference-material literacy review anchor (L.6.4.c-d with etymology emphasis): 4-card grid — PRINT DICTIONARY, DIGITAL DICTIONARY, THESAURUS (with denotation/connotation warning), ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY (etymonline.com — emphasized this term). Bottom rule: 'Etymology look-up is now a DEFAULT routine. Latin/Greek root + affix decoding is a permanent G6 habit.' Worked example: 'rhetoric' — Greek 'rhētōr' (orator/speaker) + '-ic' (related to) — 'related to the speaker's art.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-28
Chart
Audience-register matrix for rhetorical performance (SL.6.6): 2x3 grid. ROWS: peer / cross-grade / adult-community. COLS: formal / informal. Each cell with examples of register choices — vocabulary (Tier-1 vs. Tier-2 vs. Tier-3), idiom appropriateness, pace, eye-contact protocol, hand-gesture norms. Worked example: PEER + FORMAL (school assembly with peers) = Tier-2 vocabulary preferred, idioms cautiously, eye-contact rotating, hand-gestures sparingly. ADULT-COMMUNITY + FORMAL (community council) = Tier-2 plus domain-specific Tier-3 where appropriate, idioms only if culturally shared, eye-contact direct, hand-gestures purposeful. Bottom rule: 'Register is audience-attuned voice. Your devices are tools; register is the dial.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-29
Chart
Workshop calendar (18-week spring): visual timeline with weeks 1-18. Weeks 1-3: rhetorical-device introduction (ethos/pathos/logos applied + parallelism + anaphora). Weeks 4-5: asyndeton + rhetorical question + active/passive. Weeks 5-9: LITERARY-ANALYSIS ESSAY arc — mentor-text close-reading + SOAP intro + device-analysis bodies + so-what conclusion + 3-pass peer revision. Week 9: midterm. Weeks 10-12: antithesis + sentence rhythm + tricolon + idiom analysis + denotation/connotation + analogy completion. Weeks 13-17: ORIGINAL ARGUMENT with rhetorical devices applied + 3-pass peer revision + presentation prep. Week 18: Rhetorician's Forum. Print-ready 18x24.
MG-30
Diagram
Rhetorical-device decision tree: a flowchart helping students choose WHICH device to apply for WHICH effect. Start: 'What is the purpose of this passage?' Branch 1 'List of similar ideas → use PARALLELISM.' Branch 2 'Emphasis through repetition → use ANAPHORA.' Branch 3 'Speed/urgency in a list → use ASYNDETON.' Branch 4 'Engage audience to feel they answered → use RHETORICAL QUESTION.' Branch 5 'Highlight a sharp contrast → use ANTITHESIS.' Each terminal node references the relevant MG anchor (MG-3 to MG-7). Print-ready 11x17.
MG-31
Chart
Tricolon worked-examples wall: 12 historical and contemporary tricolons illustrated. 'Veni, vidi, vici.' (Caesar). 'Government of the people, by the people, for the people.' (Lincoln). 'Friends, Romans, countrymen.' (Shakespeare Julius Caesar). 'Stop, look, listen.' (railroad safety). 'Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' (US Declaration — note this uses 'and' = polysyndeton; without 'and' = asyndeton). 'Faith, hope, love.' (1 Corinthians 13). 'Liberté, égalité, fraternité.' (French Revolution). 'The good, the bad, and the ugly.' (film title). 'Mind, body, spirit.' (wellness). 'Education, education, education.' (Tony Blair anaphora-tricolon). 'Read, write, lead.' (school motto). 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' (Caesar). Bottom: 'Three is the magic number for memorable rhetoric.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-32
Interactive
Physical / non-image
Device-spot game (digital + print): students see 15 mentor-text passages and identify the rhetorical device used. Multiple-choice answers per passage with feedback explaining the effect. Print version: 15 sentence cards in deck; sort into 5 device piles (parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, rhetorical question, antithesis). Self-check key on reverse. Print-ready 8.5x11 card deck.
MG-33
Chart
Voice-and-tone-for-effect anchor (L.6.3.b deepened): 2-column card. VOICE = the writer's distinctive sound, built from word choice, sentence rhythm, and rhetorical-device preference. TONE = the writer's attitude toward subject and audience (formal/informal, serious/playful, urgent/calm, intimate/distant). Worked example: Murakami's voice = quiet, compressed, asyndeton-heavy. King's voice = soaring, anaphora-rich, biblical cadence. Adichie's voice = conversational, question-driven, intellectually generous. Bottom rule: 'Voice is who you are; tone is how you sound right now. Both must be consistent within a piece, but voice persists across pieces while tone shifts with audience and occasion.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-34
Chart
Physical / non-image
Self-reflection rubric (assessment-as-learning): 3-2-1 reflection template extended for G6-spring. Three STRENGTHS in your literary-analysis essay + original argument (with quoted lines showing rhetorical-device application). Two REVISION TARGETS for next time (with specific moves named — e.g., 'try antithesis in my conclusion next time'). One GOAL for G7-fall (the next writing unit — research process and MLA). Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-35
Chart
Q&A preparation anchor for Rhetorician's Forum: 3 likely audience questions per device. 'You used anaphora in paragraph 3 — what effect were you going for?' 'Why did you choose a rhetorical question to open the paragraph?' 'How does your antithesis serve your argument's claim?' Sample prepared answers for each, modeled with concede-pivot-refute moves for hostile questions. Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-36
Chart
Final reflection conference protocol (week 18): 1:1 conference between teacher and student. 6 questions — (1) Name the rhetorical device you grew most comfortable using this term. Why? (2) Name the device you still find difficult. What's hard? (3) Walk me through your 3-pass revision process — which pass did you find most useful? (4) Compare your fall argument to your spring argument. What grew? (5) What's a rhetorical question you'd ask of yourself as a writer right now? (6) What's one thing about your writing identity that you want to carry into G7? Bottom rule: 'Conference is documentation — keep notes in student portfolio.' Print-ready 8.5x11.
Lessons (20)
Skills (19)
- Use ACTIVE and PASSIVE voice DELIBERATELY for rhetorical effect (CCSS L.6.3.a applied; Lanham Paramedic Method) G6
- Use the COLON correctly with 4 rules (CCSS L.6.2.b; English NC Y6 V/G/P) G6
- REVIEW and integrate L.6.1.a-e pronoun mastery (case, intensive, consistency, vague antecedents, Standard-English variations) — from G6-fall G6
- Use the SEMICOLON correctly with 3 rules (CCSS L.6.2.b; English NC Y6 V/G/P) G6
- Identify and construct ANAPHORA — repetition at the start of successive clauses or sentences (CCSS L.6.3.a; RI.6.4) G6
- Identify and construct ANTITHESIS (introduced) — contrasting ideas in parallel structure (CCSS L.6.3.a; RI.6.6) G6
- Identify and construct ASYNDETON — omission of conjunctions in a list for compressed power (CCSS L.6.3.a) G6
- Apply ETHOS / PATHOS / LOGOS for audience-aware argument (CCSS L.6.3.a; W.6.1.a-e applied; extends G6-fall introduction) G6
- Identify and construct PARALLELISM — matching grammatical structure across phrases or clauses (CCSS L.6.1.e applied; CCSS L.6.3.a) G6
- Identify and construct RHETORICAL QUESTIONS — questions posed for effect, not requiring an answer (CCSS L.6.3.a; RI.6.6) G6
- Vary SENTENCE RHYTHM — short for emphasis, long for development, tricolon for memorable closure (CCSS L.6.3.a applied) G6
- Complete ANALOGIES (a:b::c:d) using 4 word-relationship types (CCSS L.6.5.b) G6
- Distinguish DENOTATION (dictionary meaning) from CONNOTATION (associations) and apply both in argument (CCSS L.6.5.b/c) G6
- Analyze IDIOMS — cultural origin, literal vs. figurative meaning, register, audience appropriateness (CCSS L.6.5.a) G6
- Acquire and use Tier-2 Set 14 RHETORICAL/LITERARY-ANALYSIS vocabulary (CCSS L.6.6) G6
- Write a 4-5 paragraph LITERARY-ANALYSIS-OF-RHETORIC essay (CCSS W.6.2.a-f informative/explanatory applied; RI.6.4-6-8) G6
- Compose an original argument with at least 3 NAMED RHETORICAL DEVICES applied (CCSS W.6.1.a-e; L.6.3.a applied) G6
- Conduct FORMAL THREE-PASS peer revision — CONTENT, SENTENCE, MECHANICS (CCSS W.6.5) G6
Assessments (3)
- Summative week 18 90 min covers 18 skills
- Summative week 9 75 min covers 7 skills
- Self Reflection Assessment As Learning ongoing — after literary-analysis essay (week 9) and after Rhetorician's Forum (week 18) 15 min covers 0 skills
Standards alignment
Pedagogical anchors
-
Graham & Perin 'Writing Next' (Carnegie Corporation 2007) — explicit strategy instruction (0.82); summarization (0.82); collaborative writing (0.75); specific product goals (0.70); word processing (0.55); sentence-combining (0.50); inquiry activities (0.32); pre-writing (0.32); study of models (0.25); writing for content learning (0.23). PRIMARY anchor at G6.
Graham & Perin is the PRIMARY anchor. Explicit strategy instruction taught through (a) the rhetorical-devices planner (lesson 3 — RAVEN: Rhetorical-Aware Voice and Engagement Notation), (b) the 3-pass revision named-moves anchor (lessons 16-18 — content/sentence/mechanics), (c) the literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay scaffold (lessons 7-10). Collaborative writing via three-pass peer protocols in lessons 16-18 (CPR — Content, Punctuation, Refinement pass discipline replacing G6-fall's single SBAR). Sentence-combining drills via parallelism, anaphora, and tricolon construction in lessons 5-6, 11-12. Specific product goals: a 4-5 paragraph LITERARY ANALYSIS of rhetorical strategy in a mentor text (weeks 5-9) + a culminating ORIGINAL ARGUMENT with at least 4 named rhetorical devices applied (weeks 10-18). Study of models: 5 mentor speeches/essays read closely (Lincoln, King, Sotomayor, Adichie, Murakami). Word processing — typed publication default.
-
Aristotle's Rhetoric — three modes of persuasion (ETHOS, PATHOS, LOGOS) PLUS the rhetorical devices of his style: ANAPHORA (repetition at the start of successive clauses), PARALLELISM (matching grammatical structure), ASYNDETON (omission of conjunctions for compressed power), ANTITHESIS (juxtaposition of contrasting ideas in parallel structure), RHETORICAL QUESTION (a question posed for effect, not requiring an answer). At G6 these are taught as both reading-analysis tools and writing-craft moves.
Ethos/pathos/logos extended from fall introduction to active application (lesson 1). Parallelism (lesson 4), anaphora (lesson 5), asyndeton (lesson 6), rhetorical question (lesson 11), antithesis intro (lesson 12) taught as named devices with: (a) reading-side identification in mentor texts, (b) writing-side construction in own drafts. Devices spiraled into final argumentative-revision in lessons 13-15.
-
The Writing Revolution / Hochman Method — sentence-level routines retained: SPO; conjunction-driven sentence stretching with 'because/but/so/although/however/whereas/since'; sentence-combining drills; embedded-quotation. At G6-spring Hochman is the engine for sentence-level rhetorical-device construction (parallelism = matching grammatical structure; tricolon = sentence combining of 3 short related sentences).
Hochman sentence-combining is the workhorse for sentence-level rhetorical-device construction. Parallelism drill in lesson 4 uses Hochman sentence-combining (combine 3 sentences with matching verb forms into 1 parallel sentence). Tricolon drill in lesson 5. The 'although/but/however' Hochman triad applied to antithesis (lesson 12). Embedded-quotation continued from G6-fall with attention to how the quote's rhetorical-device choice affects the analysis.
-
Lucy Calkins' Units of Study — Grade 6 Literary Essay (entering analysis of rhetorical strategy) and Grade 6 Argument (Bend III — Presenting Positions). At G6-spring the workshop format runs two LONGER pieces with formal multi-pass revision discipline.
Two-piece workshop arc: PIECE 1 = literary-analysis-of-rhetoric essay (lessons 7-10 drafting); PIECE 2 = original argument with rhetorical devices applied (lessons 13-18 drafting and presenting). Calkins' 'writerly noticing' move applied to rhetorical-device study in mentor texts (lessons 1, 4-6, 11, 12).
-
Beck & McKeown 'Bringing Words to Life' — three-encounter Tier-2 vocabulary; G6-spring focuses on RHETORICAL and LITERARY-ANALYSIS precision words (rhetoric, device, parallelism, anaphora, asyndeton, antithesis, tricolon, juxtaposition, register, audience, persona, tone, voice, rhythm, cadence — Tier-2 Set 14). Three-encounter pattern: introduce in reading model → use in writing → defend in oral presentation.
Tier-2 Set 14 launches across lessons 1-12 with rhetorical-analysis precision words. Three-encounter pattern enforced through the literary-analysis essay (use in writing) and the culminating oral presentation (defend in speaking).
-
Lemov 'Teach Like a Champion 3.0' — discussion protocols including COLD CALL, TURN AND TALK, EVERYBODY WRITES, SHOW CALL, and the SBAR-extension three-pass peer protocol; FORMAT MATTERS technique for register/Standard English. Added at G6-spring for the peer-revision protocol discipline.
Cold Call in mentor-text close-readings (lessons 1, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12) to ensure every student identifies the rhetorical device. Turn and Talk before every peer-revision pass (lessons 16-18). Show Call in lessons 9 and 17 — a chosen student's draft displayed for whole-class noticing. Format Matters for L.6.1.e Standard-English-variation work (lesson 2). Three-pass peer protocol scaffolded with Lemov's 'Right Is Right' discipline — partial answers extended, not accepted as final.
-
Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, Johnston 'Words Their Way' — Greek and Latin roots/affixes cumulative review at G6-spring (32-element fall toolkit maintained, no new roots added this term — focus shifts to MORPHOLOGY DRILLING and ANALOGY COMPLETION); idiom-analysis routine; analogy-completion sorts (synonym/antonym, part/whole, cause/effect, item/category) per L.6.5.b.
Morphology drill maintained in monthly Friday spiral (lessons distributed). Idiom-analysis routine in lesson 8 with cultural-origin notes (Tower of Babel, Achilles' heel, kicking the can — multi-cultural idiom palette). Analogy-completion sort in lesson 14 (a:b::c:d format).
-
Wineburg historical-thinking heuristics adapted to rhetorical analysis — SOURCING (who/when/audience), CONTEXTUALIZATION (rhetorical situation: speaker/audience/purpose/occasion — SOAP analysis adapted), CORROBORATION (how does this rhetoric compare to other rhetoric on the same issue).
SOAP framework (Speaker/Occasion/Audience/Purpose) for rhetorical-analysis essay (lesson 7). Sourcing in mentor-text introductions (every rhetorical-device lesson: who is speaking, when, to whom). Corroboration in lesson 13 (compare King's anaphora to Lincoln's anaphora — same device, different historical moment).
-
Routman 'Writing Essentials' and Atwell 'In the Middle' — workshop format extended to MULTI-WEEK pieces; Atwell's 'minilesson + work time + share' shape. Spring extends fall's 6-stage cycle (PLAN-RESEARCH-DRAFT-REVISE-PEER-EDIT-PUBLISH) with FORMAL 3-PASS REVISION inserted between DRAFT and PEER-EDIT.
6-stage workshop continues from fall with the addition of a formal 3-PASS REVISION discipline. Each pass has its own rubric, anchor, and named moves (Pass 1 CONTENT — anchor MG-21; Pass 2 SENTENCE — anchor MG-22; Pass 3 MECHANICS — anchor MG-23). Replaces fall's single-pass SBAR.
-
Strunk & White 'The Elements of Style' and Lanham 'Revising Prose' — Lanham's PARAMEDIC METHOD for converting passive-zombie prose into active-agent prose (find the action; find the actor; put actor first; convert verb-noun to verb; cut prepositions). Used in lesson 2 (active/passive for effect) and lesson 17 (Pass 2 sentence-level revision).
Paramedic Method applied as the sentence-revision routine in lesson 17 (Pass 2). Active/passive choice taught in lesson 2 with worked examples: active for agent-foregrounding, passive for agent-obscuring (scientific writing, when actor is unknown, or for rhythm).
-
Christensen 'Reading, Writing, and Rising Up' and Bomer & Bomer 'For a Better World' — argumentative writing as civic agency; rhetorical devices as tools historically used in liberation movements; culturally diverse mentor argument texts.
Mentor speech corpus includes King 'I Have a Dream' (anaphora; antithesis), Sotomayor commencement (parallelism), Adichie 'Danger of a Single Story' (rhetorical question), Murakami Nobel (asyndeton/cadence), Cesar Chavez 'Wrath of Grapes' speech (parallelism, ethos), Wangari Maathai Nobel lecture (rhetorical question, parallelism), Vanessa Nakate climate speech (anaphora). Students see rhetorical devices as tools across cultures, eras, and causes.
-
Janet Allen & Robert Marzano — academic vocabulary instruction with sentence-frame scaffolding for rhetorical analysis ('The writer uses ___ to ___'; 'By repeating ___, the writer creates ___'; 'The parallel structure ___ emphasizes ___').
Sentence-frames embedded in every literary-analysis lesson (7-10) and in peer-revision protocols (16-18). Rhetorical-analysis frames in MG-9 anchor.
-
Probst & Beers 'Notice and Note Nonfiction Signposts' — Contrasts and Contradictions; Extreme or Absolute Language; Quoted Words; Word Gaps. Applied to rhetorical-device identification in mentor texts.
Nonfiction Signposts as rhetorical-device-finding routine. 'Extreme or Absolute Language' overlaps with ETHOS exaggeration. 'Contrasts and Contradictions' overlaps with ANTITHESIS. Used as a starter scaffold in lessons 4-6, 11-12 before more advanced device-naming.
-
Keyboarding / Typed Publication — Grade 6 assumes keyboarding fluency. The published literary-analysis and argument essays are typed by default; handwritten optional only for IEP/504.
Keyboarding maintenance drill once weekly (10 min) continues from fall. Typed publication default for both pieces.
Depth bar
CCSS by formally teaching SIX NAMED RHETORICAL DEVICES — ETHOS/PATHOS/LOGOS application (extending fall introduction), PARALLELISM (CCSS L.6.1.e applied), ANAPHORA, ASYNDETON, RHETORICAL QUESTION, and ANTITHESIS (introduced) — as both READING-analysis tools (RI.6.4, RI.6.6, RI.6.8) and WRITING-craft moves (W.6.1.a-e revision); by teaching ACTIVE vs. PASSIVE VOICE FOR EFFECT as a named craft choice (L.6.3.a stretch — passive voice is not banned but deliberately chosen for agent-obscuring, scientific objectivity, or rhythm); by teaching SENTENCE RHYTHM with short-sentence-for-emphasis, long-sentence-for-development, and tricolon (3-part parallel) — extending G6-fall's 6-pattern sentence variation toolkit; by deepening L.6.2 punctuation to SEMICOLON FOR COMPOUND SENTENCES (3 rules — independent clauses joined; before transitions like 'however / therefore / moreover / nevertheless' with comma after; in complex lists with internal commas) and COLON FOR LISTS AND APPOSITIVES (4 rules — to introduce a list, to introduce an appositive, before a quotation, between two independent clauses where the second explains the first); by establishing FORMAL MULTI-PASS PEER REVISION PROTOCOLS — Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience), Pass 2 SENTENCE-LEVEL (rhetorical devices applied; voice; rhythm; parallelism), Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronouns; punctuation; spelling) — extending G6-fall's single SBAR protocol into a three-stage discipline with named rubric per pass; by extending workshop with LONGER multi-week pieces (4-6 weeks per piece, two pieces over the term: a literary-analysis essay analyzing rhetorical strategy in a mentor text + a culminating original argument with rhetorical devices applied); by deepening L.6.5.a FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE with systematic IDIOM ANALYSIS (cultural origin, literal vs. figurative meaning, register, audience appropriateness) and L.6.5.b WORD RELATIONSHIPS through formal ANALOGY-COMPLETION routines (a:b::c:d — part/whole, synonym/antonym, cause/effect, item/category); by deepening reference-material literacy to include LATIN/GREEK ETYMOLOGY look-up as a default routine; by introducing PUBLIC-SPEAKING AS RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE (SL.6.4-6 stretch) — the culminating piece is PRESENTED with rhetorical devices marked in the script (anaphora highlighted, rhetorical questions paused for, parallelism emphasized) and audience-attuned voice/pace; by formally distinguishing DENOTATION (dictionary meaning) from CONNOTATION (associations) as separate L.6.5.b/c lessons before integration; by introducing the LITERARY-ANALYSIS-OF-RHETORIC essay as a new genre (W.6.2.a-f informative/explanatory applied to RI.6.4-6-8 rhetorical analysis) — students read a mentor argument (Lincoln's Gettysburg Address; King's I Have a Dream; Sotomayor commencement; Adichie 'Danger of a Single Story'; Murakami Nobel speech) and write a 4-5 paragraph essay analyzing HOW the writer uses rhetorical devices for argumentative effect