Conduct FORMAL THREE-PASS peer revision — CONTENT, SENTENCE, MECHANICS (CCSS W.6.5)

Run a 3-pass peer-revision conference: Pass 1 CONTENT (claim/evidence/warrant/audience — 14 criteria); Pass 2 SENTENCE (rhetorical devices applied; voice; rhythm — 10 criteria); Pass 3 MECHANICS (pronouns/punctuation/spelling — 12 criteria). Do each pass separately and completely before moving to the next. Apply SBAR communication discipline from fall.

Mastery threshold

85%

Min instances

Typical minutes

Spaced intervals (days)

1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60

Prereqs

Plan, research, draft, revise, peer-edit, and publish a 5-6 paragraph argument with at least 2 sources and 1 counterclaim (CCSS W.6.1.a-e)

Successors

eng.g7.f.wr.multi_pass_revision_advanced
(not yet loaded)

Common misconceptions

Conflates passes — tries to catch a comma while still discussing whether the claim holds up.
Skips Pass 1 because 'the writer probably has good content already.'

Exercise pool (3)

Diff	Stem	Type
3	Self-audit your literary-analysis essay against MG-16 Pass 1 CONTENT 14 criteria. For each criterion: YES/PARTLY/NO. Note 2-3 revision targets.	pass one self audit
3	Watch the Show Call student's draft (lesson 17). Identify the 3+ devices applied. Suggest one MORE device the writer could add and...	pass two show call analysis
4	Conduct all 3 passes (CONTENT, SENTENCE, MECHANICS) on a partner's argument over 3 sessions. Submit all 3 check-off sheets +...	complete three passes