eng.g4.f
Grade 4 Fall — Persuasive/Argument Writing, Compound-Complex Sentences, Relative Clauses, and Modal Auxiliaries
Overview
Grade 4 Fall is the term children become ARGUERS — writers who take a clear position and defend it with reasons and evidence. Five intertwined threads run across 18 weeks. (1) PERSUASIVE/ARGUMENT WRITING (CCSS W.4.1) is the primary genre and the term's writing arc. Children plan, draft, elaborate, revise, peer-edit, and publish three persuasive pieces: a personal-conviction essay (week 1-6, drawing on personal experience and reasoning), a community-issue argument essay (week 7-12, using authentic local-topic research), and a published Argument Forum essay (week 13-18, the final showcase). Each essay has an introduction (hook + context + thesis-claim), three structured body paragraphs (CLAIM-REASON + EVIDENCE + ELABORATION + LINK — the CREEL routine), and a conclusion that LINKS BACK to the claim and addresses the SO-WHAT. The Calkins Boxes-and-Bullets arc, the Hochman SPO-and-MPO, Graham & Perin's evidence-based writing strategies, and Toulmin's claim-reason-evidence-warrant frame anchor the work. (2) COMPOUND-COMPLEX SENTENCES (CCSS L.4.1.f as sentence-variety craft). Children learn the compound-complex pattern: ONE independent clause + ONE coordinating conjunction + ANOTHER independent clause + ONE subordinating conjunction + ONE dependent clause. They build these sentences in arguments to combine claim + evidence + reasoning. Sentence-combining drills from Hochman support this. (3) RELATIVE PRONOUNS AND RELATIVE ADVERBS (CCSS L.4.1.a). Children identify and use who, whose, whom, which, that (relative pronouns) and where, when, why (relative adverbs) to embed information inside a sentence as a relative clause. This is the Y5 NC entry expectation introduced at G4. (4) GRAMMAR DEEPENING with PROGRESSIVE VERB TENSES (CCSS L.4.1.b — was walking, am walking, will be walking) and MODAL AUXILIARIES (CCSS L.4.1.c — can, may, must, should, would). Children use modals to soften or strengthen persuasive claims ('We should plant more trees' is stronger than 'I think we could plant more trees'). ORDER OF ADJECTIVES (CCSS L.4.1.d — opinion-size-age-shape-color-origin-material-purpose) is taught with the OPSHACOMP mnemonic and applied to vivid descriptive evidence in persuasive writing. FREQUENTLY CONFUSED WORDS (CCSS L.4.1.g — to/too/two, there/their/they're, your/you're, its/it's) are explicitly taught with anchor charts and applied in revision. (5) MECHANICS AND VOCABULARY. CAPITALIZATION IN TITLES (CCSS L.4.2.a) — capitalize the first and last word, all nouns/pronouns/verbs/adjectives/adverbs, but lowercase short articles/prepositions/coordinating conjunctions in the middle. COMMAS AND QUOTATION MARKS IN DIALOGUE AND QUOTED MATERIAL FROM A TEXT (CCSS L.4.2.b) — applied to embedded quotations from sources in argument essays. COMMA BEFORE COORDINATING CONJUNCTION IN COMPOUND SENTENCES (CCSS L.4.2.c) — applied in compound and compound-complex sentence work. HFW Set 9 (next 25 high-frequency words tilted toward academic and argument vocabulary) and Tier-2 Set 9 (15 argument/process words: claim, reason, evidence, elaborate, link, persuade, convince, argue, counter, acknowledge, refute, justify, support, position, perspective). VOCABULARY with GREEK/LATIN AFFIXES AND ROOTS (CCSS L.4.4.b — auto-, bio-, photo-, -graph, -logy) is taught alongside context clues (L.4.4.a) and reference materials (L.4.4.c). FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE — SIMILES AND METAPHORS (CCSS L.4.5.a) — is taught and applied in introductions (hooks) and conclusions (so-what closings). The WORKSHOP CONTINUES from G3 with the arguer's-workshop variant — children name a TERRITORY (a topic they have conviction about), use the BOXES-AND-BULLETS planner (Calkins), and follow the named revision-moves anchor (TWR + Calkins). REVISION moves: stronger word choice with Tier-2 substitutions, add elaboration (the WHY behind the evidence), combine sentences for compound-complex variety, check modal-auxiliary precision, check confused-word usage, add a link-back transition at each paragraph opening, check capitalization in titles, check progressive-tense consistency. The 8-CRITERION PEER-EDITING RUBRIC is formally introduced in lesson 19: (1) intro has hook + context + thesis-claim, (2) three body paragraphs with CREEL, (3) link-back transitions at paragraph openings, (4) ≥1 compound-complex sentence per essay, (5) modal-auxiliary precision (no overuse of one), (6) ≥1 relative clause embedded, (7) confused-words and title-capitalization correct, (8) conclusion links back to claim with so-what. The term closes with the ARGUMENT FORUM — a classroom-wide walkabout where each child presents their published persuasive essay alongside a single-page evidence panel (a chart, photo, or quoted source with caption) and answers two questions from visitors.
Essential questions
- How does an arguer take a position and convince a reader — and what is the difference between SHOUTING an opinion and BUILDING an argument?
- What is the difference between a REASON (why I believe this) and EVIDENCE (proof that supports the reason)?
- Why does the choice of modal auxiliary (can, may, must, should, would) change the strength of a claim — and when does each fit?
- How does a RELATIVE CLAUSE (with who, whose, whom, which, that, where, when, why) let a writer pack two ideas into one sentence?
- What is a COMPOUND-COMPLEX sentence, and when does it land better than a simple or a compound sentence?
- Why does adjective order (opinion-size-age-shape-color-origin-material-purpose) feel natural to readers — and what happens when you reverse it?
- How does a writer keep PROGRESSIVE TENSE consistent across a paragraph — and when does a tense shift add information rather than confuse the reader?
- What makes a SIMILE or METAPHOR a persuasive move — not just a poetic one?
- How does a peer editor of persuasive writing notice what a peer editor of informational writing might miss — and which of the 8 rubric criteria is the hardest to get right?
- How does the COUNTER-ARGUMENT move (acknowledge-and-rebut) strengthen rather than weaken an argument?
Enduring understandings
- A persuasive essay states a CLAIM and supports it with REASONS and EVIDENCE; readers can follow the logic from claim to reason to evidence and back.
- The CREEL routine — CLAIM-REASON + EVIDENCE + ELABORATION + LINK — builds a body paragraph that defends one reason for the thesis claim.
- A REASON answers 'why?'; EVIDENCE answers 'what proves it?'; ELABORATION answers 'how does this evidence support the reason?'; a LINK ties the paragraph back to the thesis or forward to the next body paragraph.
- Modal auxiliaries (can, may, must, should, would) carry different strengths: MUST and SHOULD are strong; CAN and MAY are possibility; WOULD is hypothetical or polite. Choose the modal that matches the strength of your claim.
- A relative pronoun (who, whose, whom, which, that) or relative adverb (where, when, why) opens a relative clause that adds information about a noun without starting a new sentence.
- A compound-complex sentence combines two independent clauses (joined by a coordinating conjunction) with at least one dependent clause (joined by a subordinating conjunction or a relative pronoun).
- Adjective order in English follows a conventional pattern (OPSHACOMP: opinion-size-age-shape-color-origin-material-purpose); breaking the order sounds odd to a reader.
- Progressive verb tenses (past progressive WAS/WERE+-ing; present progressive AM/IS/ARE+-ing; future progressive WILL BE+-ing) describe ongoing action; a paragraph should maintain progressive-vs-simple consistency unless a shift signals a time-change.
- Confused words sound the same but mean different things; the to/too/two, there/their/they're, your/you're, and its/it's distinctions matter to readers because misusing one signals carelessness.
- Capitalize the first and last word of a title; capitalize all important words; lowercase short articles, prepositions, and coordinating conjunctions in the middle of a title.
- Commas and quotation marks mark direct speech and quoted material from a text; a comma before a coordinating conjunction is required when the conjunction joins two independent clauses.
- Similes (X is LIKE Y / X is AS ___ AS Y) and metaphors (X IS Y) compare two unlike things to make a vivid point; they are persuasive moves when the comparison amplifies a claim.
- Revision is a named, multi-step practice; the 8-criterion peer-editing rubric is a tool for both writer and reader, and the peer editor is a reader — the writer always picks up the pencil last.
- An argument that ACKNOWLEDGES a counter-claim and then REBUTS it is stronger than one that pretends no counter-claim exists.
Visual reference library 20 assets
MG-1
Illustration
Unit-opener: a Grade-4 writer at an arguer's-workshop table with a boxes-and-bullets planner laid open, a 5-paragraph argument-essay planner pinned alongside (intro=blue, body 1=yellow, body 2=orange, body 3=red, conclusion=green), a stack of evidence-card index cards, a printed kid-friendly article about local park preservation, and a topic post-it 'Topic: Should our school keep its outdoor recess in winter?'. Behind the table a wall display shows the CREEL paragraph anatomy in 4 colored bands (claim-reason=purple, evidence=blue, elaboration=orange, link=green). Style: warm watercolor, multicultural classroom, eye-level shot, dyslexic-friendly classroom labels visible. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-2
Chart
Physical / non-image
Argument-essay 5-box anchor poster: five labeled boxes in a horizontal row — INTRODUCTION (blue, with hook+context+claim icon), BODY 1 (yellow, with claim-reason 1 icon), BODY 2 (orange, with claim-reason 2 icon), BODY 3 (red, with claim-reason 3 icon), CONCLUSION (green, with link-back+so-what icon). Below each box: a sentence-frame ('Have you ever ___? Every ___ deserves ___. I believe that ___ because ___, ___, and ___.' / 'First, ___ because ___.' / 'Second, ___.' / 'Third, ___.' / 'For these reasons, ___. So the next time you ___, remember ___.'). Print-ready 11x17, dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-3
Chart
Physical / non-image
CREEL body-paragraph anchor chart: a 4-band stacked card — CLAIM-REASON (purple, flag icon — 'this body paragraph's reason for the thesis'), EVIDENCE (blue, magnifying-glass — 'a fact, quote, statistic, or example that proves the reason'), ELABORATION (orange, gear icon — 'a sentence that EXPLAINS how the evidence proves the reason'), LINK (green, arrow — 'a sentence that ties this body paragraph back to the thesis or forward to the next paragraph'). Worked example below: 'Outdoor recess in winter helps students focus during afternoon lessons. (CLAIM-REASON) A 2018 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics found that students who had at least 20 minutes of outdoor movement after lunch scored 12% higher on afternoon attention tests. (EVIDENCE) When students move their bodies and breathe cold fresh air, their brains receive more oxygen, and they can focus better on reading and math. (ELABORATION) For this reason alone, our school should keep its winter recess. (LINK)' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-4
Chart
Modal-auxiliary strength anchor: 5 modals arranged on a vertical strength bar with example sentences. MUST (red, top — strongest necessity): 'We must protect our local park.' SHOULD (orange — strong recommendation): 'Our school should keep winter recess.' WOULD (yellow — hypothetical/polite): 'If we lost recess, students would lose focus.' CAN (light blue — ability/possibility): 'Students can learn outside even in cold weather.' MAY (light green, bottom — permission/possibility): 'Visitors may walk in the park.' Each modal has 2 example sentences and a one-line note: 'Choose the modal that matches the strength of your claim.' Print-ready 11x17, dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-5
Chart
Relative-pronoun and relative-adverb anchor: two columns. RELATIVE PRONOUNS (left): WHO (people, subject) — 'The teacher who teaches us writing'; WHOSE (possessive) — 'The student whose backpack is red'; WHOM (people, object — formal) — 'The author whom I admire'; WHICH (things, non-restrictive) — 'My favorite book, which I read three times'; THAT (restrictive — required info) — 'The book that I read last week'. RELATIVE ADVERBS (right): WHERE (place) — 'The park where we play'; WHEN (time) — 'The day when we started'; WHY (reason) — 'The reason why I believe'. Worked example showing each in a sentence. Bottom rule: 'A relative clause adds information about a noun WITHOUT starting a new sentence.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-6
Chart
Compound-complex sentence anchor: a labeled diagram of a compound-complex sentence broken into parts. Example: 'Although the weather is cold, students still need outdoor recess, and teachers report better focus afterward.' Labels: 'Although the weather is cold' = DEPENDENT (subordinator 'although' + clause, blue underline), 'students still need outdoor recess' = INDEPENDENT 1 (red underline), ', and' = COORDINATOR (FANBOYS, comma + coordinator, green box), 'teachers report better focus afterward' = INDEPENDENT 2 (red underline). Bottom rule: 'Compound-Complex = ≥2 independent clauses + ≥1 dependent clause. Comma before FANBOYS coordinator; comma after fronted dependent clause.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-7
Chart
OPSHACOMP adjective-order anchor: a horizontal 8-column strip with order positions and example adjectives. 1. OPINION (lovely, useful), 2. SIZE (big, tiny), 3. AGE (old, young), 4. SHAPE (round, square), 5. COLOR (red, blue), 6. ORIGIN (Chinese, French), 7. MATERIAL (wooden, plastic), 8. PURPOSE (running, cooking). Worked example: 'a beautiful (opinion) little (size) old (age) round (shape) brown (color) wooden (material) jewelry (purpose) box'. Bottom rule: 'OPSHACOMP — opinion → purpose. Native speakers feel the order without thinking; writers can use it on purpose.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-8
Chart
Confused-words anchor (4 quadrants): TO/TOO/TWO (top left): TO = direction ('to school'); TOO = also/excessive ('too cold'); TWO = number 2. THERE/THEIR/THEY'RE (top right): THERE = place; THEIR = possessive; THEY'RE = they are. YOUR/YOU'RE (bottom left): YOUR = possessive; YOU'RE = you are. ITS/IT'S (bottom right): ITS = possessive (no apostrophe!); IT'S = it is. Each quadrant has 2 example sentences and a memory trick. Bottom rule: 'Sound the same. Mean different. Read aloud the contraction-version to test.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-9
Chart
Physical / non-image
Progressive-tense anchor: three rows (PAST PROGRESSIVE, PRESENT PROGRESSIVE, FUTURE PROGRESSIVE). PAST PROG: WAS/WERE + verb-ing — 'Yesterday at 3pm, I was walking home when it began to rain.' PRESENT PROG: AM/IS/ARE + verb-ing — 'Right now I am writing my argument essay.' FUTURE PROG: WILL BE + verb-ing — 'Tomorrow at this time we will be presenting at the Argument Forum.' Bottom rule: 'Progressive = action in progress. Use AM/IS/ARE/WAS/WERE/WILL BE + the -ing form. Maintain progressive-vs-simple consistency within a paragraph.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-10
Chart
Arguer's-workshop status-of-class wall chart: 7-column grid TERRITORY | BOXES-AND-BULLETS | DRAFT | ELABORATE | REVISE | PEER-EDIT | PUBLISH. Each child has a magnetic name-tile moved into the column matching their current stage at the start of each workshop block. Each column has a 1-sentence definition and an icon. Print-ready 18x24.
MG-11
Video
Physical / non-image
3:40-minute model of a Grade-4 writer working through one arguer's-workshop block: child holds a territory card ('outdoor recess in winter'), uses the boxes-and-bullets planner to map thesis + 3 reasons + evidence per reason, then drafts a CREEL paragraph using the 4-band template. Voiceover narration explains the metacognitive moves: 'I am choosing MUST in my claim because I feel strongly... my evidence has to be SPECIFIC, not vague... my elaboration is where I prove WHY this evidence supports my reason.' Multicultural child voice. Caption track on.
MG-12
Video
Physical / non-image
3:20-minute peer-edit model using the 8-criterion rubric on a Grade-4 argument draft: timestamped overlays at each criterion (0:00 INTRO HAS HOOK+CONTEXT+CLAIM, 0:25 CREEL IN 3 BODY PARAGRAPHS, 0:50 LINK-BACK TRANSITIONS, 1:15 ≥1 COMPOUND-COMPLEX SENTENCE, 1:40 MODAL PRECISION, 2:05 ≥1 RELATIVE CLAUSE, 2:30 CONFUSED-WORDS + TITLE CAPS, 2:55 CONCLUSION LINKS BACK). Real-feel classroom; both children visibly use the MG-13 rubric check-off sheet.
MG-13
Chart
Physical / non-image
8-criterion peer-editing rubric check-off sheet (print-ready 8.5x11, one per peer-edit cycle): 1. INTRODUCTION HAS HOOK + CONTEXT + THESIS-CLAIM. 2. THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH CREEL (claim-reason + evidence + elaboration + link). 3. LINK-BACK TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS. 4. AT LEAST ONE COMPOUND-COMPLEX SENTENCE. 5. MODAL-AUXILIARY PRECISION (varied; no overuse of one). 6. AT LEAST ONE RELATIVE CLAUSE. 7. CONFUSED-WORDS USED CORRECTLY + TITLE CAPITALIZED PROPERLY. 8. CONCLUSION LINKS BACK TO CLAIM + ADDRESSES SO-WHAT. Each criterion has a checkbox (yes / partly / no), a notes line, and a one-sentence quote/example space.
MG-14
Chart
Boxes-and-bullets planner template (Calkins): one large box at top labeled THESIS-CLAIM, three medium boxes below labeled REASON 1, REASON 2, REASON 3, each with 2-3 bullet lines for evidence beneath it, and one small box at the bottom labeled SO-WHAT/LINK-BACK. Print-ready 8.5x11, one per child per essay (target: 3-5 per term).
MG-15
Chart
Greek/Latin combining-form anchor: 5 combining forms with meaning and example words. AUTO- ('self'): autograph, autobiography, automatic. BIO- ('life'): biology, biography, biome. PHOTO- ('light'): photograph, photosynthesis, photogenic. -GRAPH ('writing/drawing'): autograph, telegraph, paragraph. -LOGY ('study of'): biology, geology, zoology. Worked combinations: AUTO + BIO + GRAPH + Y = AUTOBIOGRAPHY ('self-life-writing'); PHOTO + GRAPH = PHOTOGRAPH ('light-writing'); BIO + LOGY = BIOLOGY ('study of life'). Print-ready 11x17.
MG-16
Chart
Title-capitalization anchor: '4 RULES OF TITLE CAPS' — 1. Capitalize the FIRST and LAST word ALWAYS. 2. Capitalize all NOUNS, PRONOUNS, VERBS, ADJECTIVES, ADVERBS. 3. Lowercase short ARTICLES (a, an, the), short PREPOSITIONS (in, on, at, of, to, for, by, up), short COORDINATING CONJUNCTIONS (and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet) — UNLESS they are the first or last word. 4. Capitalize all words of 4+ letters. Worked examples: 'The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe' / 'Of Mice and Men' (Of is first → capital) / 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' / 'How to Train Your Dragon'. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-17
Chart
Revision-moves anchor (Grade-4 fall expansion from G3): 1. STRONGER WORD CHOICE (Tier-2 Set 9 substitution — 'I think' → 'I argue'; 'big problem' → 'urgent issue'). 2. ADD ELABORATION (after every evidence, add 1 sentence explaining WHY/HOW it supports the reason). 3. COMBINE WITH SUBORDINATING AND COORDINATING (produce one compound-complex sentence). 4. CHECK MODAL PRECISION (vary modals; match strength to claim). 5. ADD A RELATIVE CLAUSE (use who/whose/whom/which/that/where/when/why). 6. CHECK PROGRESSIVE-TENSE CONSISTENCY. 7. CHECK CONFUSED-WORDS (to/too/two, there/their/they're, your/you're, its/it's). 8. CHECK TITLE CAPITALIZATION. 9. ADD A LINK-BACK at the paragraph opening. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-18
Chart
Similes & metaphors anchor: two columns. SIMILE (left, blue border): 'X is LIKE Y' or 'X is AS [adj] AS Y'. Examples: 'The classroom felt as silent as a library.' 'Our school playground is like a busy beehive.' METAPHOR (right, orange border): 'X IS Y' (no like/as). Examples: 'The classroom was a silent library.' 'Our playground is a beehive.' Bottom rule: 'A simile or metaphor is PERSUASIVE when it AMPLIFIES your claim — choose comparisons that match your reader's experience.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-19
Chart
Argument-Forum planning poster: a 3-section card showing the LAYOUT each child uses for the Forum — TOP LEFT: published 5-paragraph essay; TOP RIGHT: a hand-drawn or printed EVIDENCE PANEL (a chart, a quoted source with attribution, a photo with caption); BOTTOM: a 'two visitor questions' note-card with space for the child to record questions actually asked and their answers. Each child gets a small tri-fold display board. Print-ready 11x17 planning template.
MG-20
Chart
Physical / non-image
Link-back transition word anchor: 4 columns by function. SEQUENCE: First, Second, Third, Finally. ADDITION: Furthermore, Additionally, In addition, Moreover. CONTRAST: However, On the other hand, In contrast, Although, Yet. LINK-BACK/CONCLUSION: For these reasons, Therefore, As a result, In conclusion, So. Each transition shows a sample paragraph-opener sentence with comma-after-fronted-transition. Print-ready 11x17.
Lessons (22)
Skills (18)
- Order adjectives within a sentence using the OPSHACOMP pattern (L.4.1.d) G4
- Produce compound-complex sentences (L.4.1.f) using coordinating + subordinating conjunctions G4
- Distinguish and use frequently confused words (L.4.1.g): to/too/two, there/their/they're, your/you're, its/it's G4
- Use modal auxiliaries can, may, must, should, would (L.4.1.c) with appropriate strength G4
- Use past, present, and future progressive tenses (L.4.1.b) G4
- Identify and use relative pronouns (who, whose, whom, which, that) and relative adverbs (where, when, why) — L.4.1.a G4
- Apply title capitalization (L.4.2.a) and commas/quotation marks for dialogue and quoted text (L.4.2.b, L.4.2.c) G4
- Use context clues and reference materials to determine meaning (L.4.4.a, L.4.4.c) G4
- Recognize and use Greek/Latin combining forms auto-, bio-, photo-, -graph, -logy (L.4.4.b) G4
- Read and write HFW Set 9 (25 words tilted toward argument/academic vocabulary) G4
- Recognize and use similes and metaphors (L.4.5.a) G4
- Use Tier-2 Set 9 argument/process academic vocabulary (Beck & McKeown) G4
- Compose a body paragraph using the CLAIM-REASON + EVIDENCE + ELABORATION + LINK (CREEL) routine G4
- Compose a persuasive introduction with hook + context + thesis-claim G4
- Apply the 8-criterion peer-editing rubric to a partner's persuasive draft G4
- Plan, draft, elaborate, revise, peer-edit, and publish a 5-paragraph persuasive/argument essay G4
- Apply named revision moves to a persuasive draft (G4 fall expansion) G4
- Generate and maintain a personal-territory inventory of topics of conviction G4
Assessments (5)
- Summative With Self Reflection week 18 100 min covers 18 skills
- Formative Summative Mix week 9 50 min covers 7 skills
- Formative weeks 11 13 15 17 10 min covers 3 skills
- Formative Observation week 10 and week 18 15 min covers 1 skill
- Assessment As Learning week 18 during publishing 25 min covers 1 skill
Standards alignment
Pedagogical anchors
-
The Writing Revolution / Hochman Method — single-paragraph outline (SPO) extended to multiple-paragraph outline (MPO) for argument writing; conjunction-driven sentence stretching with 'because', 'but', 'so', and 'although'; appositive-and-relative-clause sentence expansion; sentence-combining drills with subordinating + coordinating to produce compound-complex sentences
SPO-for-argument-body-paragraph routine taught explicitly in lessons 3, 6, 9, 12, 15; CREEL paragraph builder drills in lessons 3, 6, 9; sentence-stretching with because/but/so/although applied to claim sentences in lessons 8, 11, 14; multiple-paragraph outline (MPO) introduced as scaffold for the 5-paragraph argument essay in lesson 9; sentence-combining for compound-complex sentences in lessons 14 and 17
-
Lucy Calkins' Units of Study — Boxes and Bullets: Personal and Persuasive Essays (Grade 4 Bend I-III: gathering territories, drafting and elaborating, revising for clarity and audience)
Persuasive-essay arc across lessons 1-3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 22; territories-of-thought launch in lesson 1; boxes-and-bullets planner in lesson 3; revision-for-audience in lessons 15 and 18; end-of-unit publication and Argument Forum in lesson 22
-
Graham & Perin 'Writing Next' — explicit strategy instruction for planning, revising, and editing (effect size 0.82); summarization instruction (effect size 0.82); sentence-combining (effect size 0.50); pre-writing activities (effect size 0.32)
Explicit planning strategy taught through boxes-and-bullets template (lessons 3, 9); revision strategy taught through named moves anchor (lesson 15); sentence-combining drill in lessons 14 and 17 to produce compound-complex sentences; summarization-of-source instruction in lesson 10
-
Beck & McKeown 'Bringing Words to Life' — three-encounter Tier-2 vocabulary with persuasion-flavored academic-precision words and argument/process vocabulary
Tier-2 Set 9 launches in lessons 4, 10, 14, 17 with argument/process academic words (claim, reason, evidence, elaborate, link, persuade, convince, argue, counter, acknowledge, refute, justify, support, position, perspective)
-
Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, Johnston 'Words Their Way' — syllables-and-affixes and derivational-relations sort routines for Greek/Latin affixes (auto-, bio-, photo-) and combining forms (-graph, -logy)
Greek/Latin combining-form sorts in lessons 16, 17, 19; word-relationship maps in lessons 17 and 19; combining-form-meaning detective routine extended from G3 in lessons 16 and 19
-
Handwriting Without Tears — Grade 4 cursive consolidation (full set + speed building); print kept available; transition to keyboarding readiness
Cursive maintenance from G3 in lessons 1 and 13; cursive speed-building drill in spiral_review_plan; keyboarding-readiness in optional lesson 16; final published persuasive essay may be in print, cursive, or typed at child's choice
-
Strickland & Stahl — distributed retrieval for HFW automaticity
HFW Set 9 spaced rotation across all 18 weeks per spiral_review_plan; daily 5-minute retrieval routine
-
Routman 'Writing Essentials' and Atwell 'In the Middle' — workshop format extended with arguer's-workshop variant
Arguer's-workshop format launched lesson 6; status-of-the-class with ARGUMENT stages (TERRITORY, BOXES-AND-BULLETS, DRAFT, ELABORATE, REVISE, PEER-EDIT, PUBLISH); 8-criterion peer-editing rubric introduced in lesson 19
-
Toulmin Argument Model (simplified for upper elementary) — claim, reason/grounds, evidence/data, warrant/link
CREEL paragraph routine maps to Toulmin (CLAIM-REASON = claim+reason, EVIDENCE = data, ELABORATION = warrant, LINK = backing); taught explicitly in lessons 6 and 9; argument-diagram in lesson 12
Depth bar
CCSS by formally teaching the 5-PARAGRAPH ARGUMENT ESSAY with introduction (hook + context + thesis-claim), three structured body paragraphs (CLAIM-REASON + EVIDENCE + ELABORATION + LINK — the CREEL routine extending TWR/Hochman), and a conclusion that LINKS BACK to the claim and addresses the SO-WHAT for the reader (W.5.1 entry expectation), by introducing the RELATIVE CLAUSE as a syntactic-embedding move at the within-sentence level (L.5.1 entry expectation; Y5 NC entry), by introducing COMPOUND-COMPLEX SENTENCES (one independent + one independent + one dependent clause — L.5.1 entry expectation), and by introducing the COUNTER-CLAIM ACKNOWLEDGE-AND-REBUT move (W.6.1.b entry expectation) in the optional high-ceiling tier