hist.g7.s.his.spanish_conquest_inca_indigenous_perspective
Analyze the SPANISH CONQUEST OF INCA 1532-1572 FROM ANDEAN PERSPECTIVES — Pizarro vs. Atahualpa (civil war context), Cajamarca 16 November 1532, ongoing Vilcabamba neo-Inca state 1537-1572, and Tupac Amaru I's 1572 execution — anchored in Rostworowski + Guaman Poma 1615
Examine the conquest 1532-1572 with ANDEAN-FIRST narrative — Tahuantinsuyu ('four parts united') at 1530 spanned ~2 million km² and 10-12 million people from Quito to Santiago; Huayna Capac dies of smallpox c.1525-1527 (epidemic preceded Pizarro by ~7 years!); Huáscar-Atahualpa civil war 1529-1532 wins Atahualpa just as Pizarro arrives; Cajamarca encounter 16 November 1532 — 168 Spaniards capture Atahualpa via ambush; gold-room ransom + Atahualpa executed July 1533; Cuzco taken 1533; Manco Inca 1536 revolt + Vilcabamba neo-Inca state 1537-1572 (35-year armed resistance); Tupac Amaru I executed at Cuzco 1572 by Viceroy Toledo (set up for G8 — Tupac Amaru II 1780-1783 revolt continuity arc); quipu knot-records reframed as documentary primary sources per Urton + Hyland. Centers Quechua + Aymara present-tense protocol — ~8 million Quechua speakers + ~2 million Aymara speakers in contemporary Peru/Bolivia/Ecuador.
- Believing Spanish 'conquered' the Inca in a single battle Cajamarca 1532 — refuted: 35-year armed resistance from Vilcabamba 1537-1572; Tupac Amaru I executed only in 1572
- Believing Inca had no writing — refuted: khipu knot-records are a documentary system; Urton 2003 + Hyland 2014 analysis demonstrate semantic content
- Believing the Inca empire was 'doomed' or 'static' — refuted: rapid expansion 1438-1525 + sophisticated administrative system + ongoing Andean political life through 1780-1783 Tupac Amaru II + present-tense Quechua nationhood movements