Analyze the SPANISH CONQUEST OF INCA 1532-1572 FROM ANDEAN PERSPECTIVES — Pizarro vs. Atahualpa (civil war context), Cajamarca 16 November 1532, ongoing Vilcabamba neo-Inca state 1537-1572, and Tupac Amaru I's 1572 execution — anchored in Rostworowski + Guaman Poma 1615
Exercise Difficulty 4 ~10 min hist.g7.s.ex_33

Source Analysis

MG-7 Diagram
EIGHT-Question Source Card — laminated 8.5x11 double-sided REPLACING G7-Fall 7-Question Source Card with NEW 8th questio

EIGHT-Question Source Card — laminated 8.5x11 double-sided REPLACING G7-Fall 7-Question Source Card with NEW 8th question for G7-Spring multi-perspective encounter analysis. All 7 G7-Fall questions retained + Q8 ENCOUNTER MULTI-PERSPECTIVE: From whose perspective is this encounter told? Whose perspective is missing? How would the same event read from the missing perspective? Includes sentence frames in English + Spanish + Nahuatl/Quechua/Persian/Arabic transliteration glossaries; available in 14pt dyslexic font + audio version.

Prompt

Apply MG-7 Q3 CORROBORATION to two sources on Cajamarca 1532: Pizarro's secretary Pedro Sancho 1534 vs. Guaman Poma 1615. What do they agree on? Disagree?

How it's presented
mode text
Answer criteria
type rubric essay
rubric
points
3
criterion
Both sources contextualized
points
3
criterion
Agreement on basic events (capture + ransom + execution)
points
3
criterion
Disagreement on framing + agency
Hints
  1. Sancho is Spanish royal-secretary account.
  2. Guaman Poma is Quechua-Spanish bilingual illustrated chronicle 1615.
Misconceptions to watch
  • Treating Sancho as objective truth
  • Ignoring Indigenous perspective
Used in lessons