eng.g7.s
Grade 7 Spring — Analytical Essay, Syntactic Variety, and the Craft of Sentence Rhythm
Overview
Grade 7 Spring is the term children become ANALYSTS — readers who close-read a literary or rhetorical passage with discipline, writers who construct an analytical claim grounded in textual evidence, and craftspeople who treat sentence rhythm and syntactic variety as a literary tool, not a grammar drill. The 18-week arc is anchored in CCSS W.7.1.a-e and W.7.2.a-f (claim-evidence-analysis writing applied to literary and rhetorical texts) and L.7.1 (phrases and clauses as the engine of sentence craft). Eight intertwined threads run across the term.
-
01THE ANALYTICAL ESSAY
is the PRIMARY ARC — a 5-paragraph literary or rhetorical analysis essay with explicit CLAIM-EVIDENCE-ANALYSIS body structure (the CEA pattern extending G6's CEW and G7-fall's quote-sandwich). Introduction with hook + context + thesis + 3-part roadmap; three body paragraphs each making one sub-claim with embedded textual evidence and explicit analysis; conclusion synthesizing the analysis with a so-what.
-
02CLOSE READING
as a FORMAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE — the slow, multi-pass reading of a literary or informational passage.
- Pass 1
- what does it SAY? (literal comprehension).
- Pass 2
- what does it DO with language? (diction, syntax, imagery, structure, tone).
- Pass 3
- what does it MEAN? (interpretation grounded in the previous two passes). Olson and Tovani's three-pass routine.
-
03SYNTACTIC VARIETY
as a NAMED CRAFT MOVE — sentence rhythm is a literary tool. The four sentence types (simple/compound/complex/compound-complex) drilled in G7-fall now deployed deliberately. PERIODIC sentences (delaying the main clause for emphasis: 'Through every doubt, every silence, every long winter night, she kept writing.') vs. CUMULATIVE sentences (main clause first, then accumulating detail: 'She kept writing, through doubt, through silence, through long winter nights.'). DELIBERATE FRAGMENTS for effect (emphasis, pace, voice, closure). Sentence-length variation as breath and emphasis. ASYNDETON (omitting conjunctions: 'I came, I saw, I conquered') and POLYSYNDETON (piling conjunctions: 'and the rain and the cold and the wind') as listing devices. ANAPHORA (opening repetition: 'We shall fight... we shall fight... we shall fight...') as rhythm device. Stanley Fish and Virginia Tufte anchor this thread.
-
04L.7.1 PHRASES AND CLAUSES DEEPER
formal taxonomy of phrase types. APPOSITIVE phrases (a noun phrase renaming another noun: 'Angelou, a poet and memoirist, ...'). PARTICIPIAL phrases (a phrase opening with a participle: 'Walking through the gallery, she paused...'). GERUND phrases (an -ing form as noun: 'Reading slowly is the discipline of close reading'). INFINITIVE phrases (to + verb base: 'To read carefully is to read twice'). Each phrase type drilled as a sentence-expansion move.
-
05L.7.1.c MISPLACED AND DANGLING MODIFIERS CONTINUED
with new attention to DANGLING PARTICIPLES as a high-frequency analytical-prose error (the participial phrase must modify the subject of the main clause).
-
06L.7.2.a COORDINATE ADJECTIVES IN LITERARY DESCRIPTION
multi-adjective sequences in fiction and the comma rules that govern them. L.7.2.b SPELL CORRECTLY WITH REFERENCE MATERIALS — print and digital dictionaries are required reference materials, not optional. Spell-checkers as drafts, not arbiters.
-
07L.7.3.a CONCISION IN ANALYTICAL REGISTER
cutting throat-clearers from analytical openings ('In this essay I will argue that...' → 'Angelou's diction reveals...'), cutting tentative hedge stacks, cutting empty academic filler. The 7-pattern wordiness audit from G7-fall maintained and applied.
-
08L.7.4-6 VOCABULARY
LITERAL vs. FIGURATIVE meaning as a primary close-reading move (a literal reading mistakes the figurative; a figurative reading mistakes the literal). WORD RELATIONSHIPS as a 4-category system (synonym / antonym / analogy / categorical) extending G7-fall homograph work. THESAURUS LITERACY — choose-by-connotation, not substitute. 10 new literary-analysis Greek/Latin roots (chron/meta/mono/pan/phon/rhet/sym/the/troph/turb). Tier-2 Set 16 literary-analysis precision-vocabulary (diction, syntax, imagery, tone, mood, motif, symbol, characterization, point of view, irony, ambiguity, juxtaposition, allusion, foreshadowing, metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, paradox, theme — 20 words). Plus an INTRO TO LITERARY THEORY at child-appropriate level — three lenses (reader-response / formalist / historical-cultural) as starter frames. Plus FORMAL WRITING CONFERENCES with the teacher (Calkins/Atwell core move — 5-minute one-on-one conferences scheduled across the workshop). The term closes with the LITERARY ANALYSIS SHOWCASE — a public-presentation event where each student shares their analytical essay through a 90-second oral close-reading of one passage with a visual aid that makes their interpretation visible.
Essential questions
- What is CLOSE READING — and what are its three passes (what it SAYS / what it DOES / what it MEANS)?
- What is the CEA pattern (Claim / Evidence / Analysis) — and how is it different from the G7-fall quote sandwich?
- What is SYNTACTIC VARIETY — and why is sentence rhythm a literary tool, not just a grammar drill?
- What is a PERIODIC sentence — and how is it different from a CUMULATIVE sentence (L.7.1.b applied)?
- When is a SENTENCE FRAGMENT a craft choice — and when is it a mistake?
- What is an APPOSITIVE PHRASE — and how does it add detail without starting a new sentence (L.7.1.a)?
- What is a PARTICIPIAL PHRASE — and what's the dangling-participle trap (L.7.1.a, L.7.1.c)?
- What is a GERUND PHRASE — and how is the -ing word working as a noun, not a verb (L.7.1.a)?
- What is an INFINITIVE PHRASE — and what three jobs can it do (noun / adjective / adverb) (L.7.1.a)?
- When does a writer use COORDINATE ADJECTIVES in literary description — and how does the AND-test still work (L.7.2.a)?
- What is LITERAL vs. FIGURATIVE meaning — and why can mistaking one for the other ruin a reading (L.7.5.a)?
- What's the difference among SYNONYM, ANTONYM, ANALOGY, and CATEGORICAL word relationships (L.7.5.b)?
- How do I use a THESAURUS WELL — and why is the thesaurus a candidate-list, not a substitution-table (L.7.4.c)?
- What are the three LITERARY-THEORY LENSES (reader-response / formalist / historical-cultural) — and what does each one help me see?
- What is a WRITING CONFERENCE — and what makes 5 minutes with my teacher valuable?
- How do I PRESENT an analytical close-reading orally — what visual aid makes my interpretation visible (SL.7.4, SL.7.6)?
Enduring understandings
- CLOSE READING is slow, multi-pass reading. Pass 1: what does the passage literally SAY? Pass 2: what does it DO with language — diction, syntax, imagery, structure, tone? Pass 3: what does it MEAN — what is your interpretation, grounded in passes 1 and 2? Skipping passes leads to misreading.
- The CEA pattern is the analytical paragraph: CLAIM (one analytical sub-claim, more specific than the thesis), EVIDENCE (a quoted phrase or sentence from the text), ANALYSIS (multiple sentences explaining HOW the evidence supports the claim by naming what the language is doing). Without analysis, you have only summary.
- SYNTACTIC VARIETY is a craft move. Sentence rhythm carries meaning. Long sentences slow the reader; short sentences punch. Variation is the writer's breath. A paragraph of identical sentence lengths is exhausting; a paragraph that varies is alive.
- PERIODIC sentences delay the main clause: subordinate elements pile up first, then the meaning arrives at the end. Periodic sentences build suspense and emphasis. CUMULATIVE sentences put the main clause first and then accumulate: the main idea arrives at the start, then expands. Periodic = anticipation. Cumulative = expansion.
- A FRAGMENT can be a craft choice when used for EMPHASIS ('She remembered everything. Every word.'), PACE (quickening rhythm: 'He ran. Faster. Faster.'), VOICE (mimicking thought: 'Nothing. Not a sound.'), or CLOSURE (final emphasis: 'And that was that.'). A fragment is a mistake when it leaks accidentally into formal writing without purpose.
- An APPOSITIVE PHRASE is a noun phrase that renames another noun, usually set off by commas: 'Angelou, a poet and memoirist, captured...'. Appositives add detail without starting a new sentence and add rhythm by varying clause length.
- A PARTICIPIAL PHRASE opens with a participle (-ing or -ed) and modifies a noun: 'Walking through the gallery, she paused...'. The participial phrase MUST modify the subject of the main clause — otherwise it DANGLES. The 3-step repair: find the participle, find what it should modify, place adjacent.
- A GERUND PHRASE is an -ing form functioning as a NOUN: 'Reading slowly is the discipline of close reading.' Notice 'Reading' is the subject — it names a thing (an activity), not an action being performed. Gerunds let writers turn actions into subjects.
- An INFINITIVE PHRASE is 'to + verb base' and can function as a NOUN ('To read carefully is to read twice'), an ADJECTIVE ('the book to read'), or an ADVERB ('she came to learn'). Recognizing which job the infinitive does helps decode the sentence.
- COORDINATE ADJECTIVES (two adjectives that equally modify the noun) take a comma between them ('a long, exhausting day'). Literary description often stacks adjectives — the AND-test and COMMA-REVERSAL-test from G7-fall still apply. Many published writers omit commas for stylistic effect; in analytical prose, use the comma.
- LITERAL meaning is what the words SAY. FIGURATIVE meaning is what the words DO when read as metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, or symbol. The literal-vs-figurative check: does this work read literally? Does it work read figuratively? If only figuratively, name the figure. If both, the writer may intend layered meaning.
- WORD RELATIONSHIPS come in four categories. SYNONYM (similar meaning: happy / joyful). ANTONYM (opposite: hot / cold). ANALOGY (A:B :: C:D — sonnet:poem :: novel:fiction, both are member:category). CATEGORICAL (member-of-category: sonnet is a poem; iambic pentameter is a meter). Knowing the relationship deepens understanding of both words.
- A THESAURUS offers CANDIDATES, not equivalents. Two synonyms differ in connotation (claim vs. assertion), register (kid vs. child), and rhythm (a single syllable vs. three). The writer's job is to choose — not substitute. The connotation question: what does this candidate FEEL like in context?
- There are three starter LITERARY-THEORY LENSES. READER-RESPONSE: what does this text do to a reader — to ME, with my experiences? FORMALIST: what do the text's words, structure, and form do — independent of author and reader? HISTORICAL/CULTURAL: what world produced this text — when, where, by whom, for whom? Different lenses produce different (valid) readings. A skilled analyst names the lens.
- Concision in ANALYTICAL register means cutting throat-clearers ('In this essay I will argue that...' → 'Angelou's diction reveals...'), cutting tentative hedge stacks ('it might possibly perhaps seem to suggest that...' → 'suggests'), cutting empty filler ('in conclusion, in summary, to sum up'). The 7-pattern wordiness audit from G7-fall still applies — analytical writing demands MORE concision, not less.
- DICTIONARIES and THESAURUSES are required reference materials (L.7.4.c, L.7.2.b). A writer who reaches for the dictionary to verify a word's meaning, the thesaurus to weigh a word's connotation, and the dictionary again to verify the candidate is doing the work of writing. Spell-checkers catch typos; they do not catch wrong-word errors.
- A WRITING CONFERENCE is a 5-minute one-on-one with the teacher. It has four parts: opener (what are you working on?), what's working (named strength), one growth move (a specific revision to try), next step (when will I see this?). Conferences make the workshop personal.
- Analysis is PUBLIC. The Literary Analysis Showcase oral close-reading with visual aid means your interpretation is shared with an audience. Visual aids must MAKE INTERPRETATION VISIBLE — an annotated passage, a sentence-shape diagram, a concept-map of theme — not just decorate.
Visual reference library 37 assets
MG-1
Illustration
Unit-opener: a Grade-7 analyst at a workspace with a literary passage marked in 5 colors (blue diction / green imagery / purple syntax-shifts / red tone-shifts / orange ambiguity), a 'sentences I admire' notebook open beside her with three mentor sentences hand-copied, an analytical-essay draft with marginal annotations showing CEA structure (Claim / Evidence / Analysis labeled in margin), the 3-pass close-reading anchor visible on the wall (SAY / DO / MEAN), the three-lens literary-theory card on the desk (reader-response / formalist / historical-cultural), and a Tier-2 Set 16 vocabulary deck. Style: warm watercolor, multicultural middle-school classroom, eye-level shot, dyslexic-friendly classroom labels visible. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-2
Chart
Close-reading 3-pass anchor: 3-band stacked card. PASS 1 — SAY (yellow band): 'What does the passage literally say? Summarize in your own words. If you can't summarize, you can't analyze.' Sub-moves: paraphrase the passage; identify the speaker / situation / setting. PASS 2 — DO (blue band): 'What does the passage do with language? Mark diction (word choice), syntax (sentence structure), imagery (sensory language), structure (passage shape), tone (writer's attitude).' Sub-moves: annotate with 5-color toolkit; name the moves you see. PASS 3 — MEAN (purple band): 'What does the passage MEAN? Your interpretation, grounded in Passes 1 and 2.' Sub-moves: state a claim; cite specific textual evidence from your annotations; explain how the evidence supports the claim. Bottom rule: 'Skipping passes leads to misreading. The discipline IS the passes.' Print-ready 18x24.
MG-3
Chart
5-color annotation toolkit anchor: 5-band card explaining what each highlighter color marks. BLUE — DICTION: mark single-word choices that strike you (a verb that surprises, a noun with strong connotation, a register shift). GREEN — IMAGERY: mark sensory language (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch); circle the imagery; star particularly vivid images. PURPLE — SYNTAX SHIFTS: mark places where the sentence structure changes (a fragment after long sentences; a long sentence after short ones; a sudden compound-complex after simples). RED — TONE SHIFTS: mark places where the writer's attitude changes (from celebratory to wistful; from confident to uncertain). ORANGE — AMBIGUITY / QUESTIONS: mark places where the meaning is unclear or layered; write a marginal question. Bottom rule: 'Annotation is THINKING ON THE PAGE. The annotated passage is your evidence reservoir for the analytical essay.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-4
Chart
Physical / non-image
CEA analytical-paragraph anchor: 3-part stacked card. CLAIM (top, purple): one analytical sub-claim, more specific than the thesis, that the paragraph will prove. Sentence frame: 'Angelou's diction in this passage reveals ___.' EVIDENCE (middle, blue): a quoted phrase or sentence from the text, integrated with a signal phrase and parenthetical citation (G7-fall quote-sandwich pattern). Sentence frame: 'For instance, the speaker calls the room "___" (Angelou 47).' ANALYSIS (bottom, green): 3-4 sentences explaining HOW the evidence supports the claim by naming what the language is doing. NOT summary. Names diction, syntax, imagery, tone — the moves from Pass 2. Sentence frames: 'The word "___" carries a connotation of ___, which ___.' / 'By choosing "___" instead of "___", Angelou ___.' / 'This diction shows that ___.' Bottom rule: 'Without ANALYSIS, you have only summary. Analysis is the work.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-5
Chart
CEA vs. Quote Sandwich crosswalk anchor: 2-column card showing the relationship. LEFT COLUMN — G7-FALL QUOTE SANDWICH: signal phrase / quote / parenthetical / interpretive sentence. The interpretive sentence answers 'why did I quote this?'. RIGHT COLUMN — G7-SPRING CEA: Claim / Evidence (which contains the full quote sandwich) / Analysis (which extends the interpretive sentence into 3-4 sentences of analytical work). Bottom rule: 'The quote sandwich is the EVIDENCE move inside CEA. CEA adds CLAIM (the analytical sub-claim) and ANALYSIS (extended explanation). You learned the inner move last term; this term you build the outer structure.' Worked example showing both. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-6
Chart
Analytical essay 5-paragraph structural anchor: blueprint card. PARAGRAPH 1 — INTRODUCTION: HOOK (sentence-level engagement — a vivid image, a question, a startling claim) + CONTEXT (1-2 sentences about the text and author) + THESIS (your overall analytical claim, complete sentence) + 3-PART ROADMAP (the three sub-claims of the three body paragraphs, signaling structure to the reader). PARAGRAPHS 2-4 — BODY (one per sub-claim, each follows CEA): Claim (sub-claim, repeated/echoed from roadmap) + Evidence (quoted with quote-sandwich integration) + Analysis (3-4 sentences naming the language moves). PARAGRAPH 5 — CONCLUSION: synthesizes the three sub-claims into a unified analytical reading + offers a SO-WHAT (why does this analysis matter? what does it reveal about the text, the writer's craft, or the reader?). Bottom rule: 'The essay IS the analysis. If you can remove all textual evidence and the essay still works as personal opinion, you have not done analytical work.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-7
Chart
Four phrase types taxonomy anchor (CCSS L.7.1.a): 4-band stacked card with structural visualization. APPOSITIVE PHRASE — a noun phrase that renames another noun, set off by commas. STRUCTURE: [noun], [noun phrase that renames], [rest of sentence]. EXAMPLES: 'Angelou, a poet and memoirist, captured the texture of childhood.' / 'My research question, how Maya astronomy shaped architecture, demanded multiple sources.' MOVE: adds detail without starting a new sentence; adds rhythm. PARTICIPIAL PHRASE — a phrase opening with a participle (-ing or -ed form) that modifies a noun. STRUCTURE: [-ing/-ed phrase], [subject of main clause = what the phrase modifies], [rest of sentence]. EXAMPLES: 'Walking through the gallery, she paused.' / 'Exhausted from research, the writer slept.' WARNING: the participial MUST modify the subject of the main clause or it DANGLES (L.7.1.c). GERUND PHRASE — an -ing form functioning as a NOUN (often subject or object). STRUCTURE: [-ing phrase as noun], [verb], [rest]. EXAMPLES: 'Reading slowly is the discipline of close reading.' / 'She enjoyed analyzing poetry.' KEY: gerund acts like a noun, not a verb. INFINITIVE PHRASE — to + verb base functioning as noun, adjective, or adverb. STRUCTURE: 'to + verb' phrase + role in sentence. EXAMPLES: 'To read carefully is to read twice.' (noun) / 'the book to read' (adjective modifying book) / 'she came to learn' (adverb modifying came). KEY: identify the JOB the infinitive does. Bottom rule: 'Phrases give writers more options than clauses alone. Use them to vary sentence shape and add detail.' Print-ready 18x24.
MG-8
Chart
Periodic vs. cumulative sentence anchor (CCSS L.7.1.b applied as craft): 2-column card with diagrammed examples. PERIODIC (left, gold) — the main clause is DELAYED to the end. Subordinate elements pile up first; meaning arrives at the end. EFFECT: builds suspense; creates emphasis on the final word. STRUCTURE: [subordinate], [subordinate], [subordinate], MAIN CLAUSE. EXAMPLE: 'Through every doubt, every silence, every long winter night, she kept writing.' EXAMPLE: 'When the river rose, when the road washed out, when the lights flickered and died, the family stayed.' Note: the periodic sentence's emphasis lands on the LAST word — choose it deliberately. CUMULATIVE (right, blue) — the main clause comes FIRST; modifiers accumulate after. EFFECT: opens with the main idea, then expands; feels like the writer is thinking out loud and adding texture. STRUCTURE: MAIN CLAUSE, [modifier], [modifier], [modifier]. EXAMPLE: 'She kept writing, through doubt, through silence, through long winter nights.' EXAMPLE: 'The family stayed, when the river rose, when the road washed out, when the lights flickered and died.' Bottom rule: 'Periodic = anticipation. Cumulative = expansion. The same content, different shape, different meaning.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-9
Chart
Deliberate fragment 4-purpose anchor (CCSS L.7.3 / craft move): 4-band card. FRAGMENT FOR EMPHASIS — a deliberate incomplete sentence that lands a punch. EXAMPLE: 'She remembered everything. Every word.' Effect: the fragment 'Every word' amplifies 'everything' by isolating it. FRAGMENT FOR PACE — quickening rhythm by chopping. EXAMPLE: 'He ran. Faster. Faster.' Effect: the short fragments accelerate the reading speed to match the action. FRAGMENT FOR VOICE — mimicking thought or speech. EXAMPLE: 'Nothing. Not a sound. Not even the wind.' Effect: the fragments feel like interior monologue. FRAGMENT FOR CLOSURE — final emphasis ending a paragraph or section. EXAMPLE: 'And that was that.' Effect: closes a section with rhythmic finality. WARNING: a fragment is a MISTAKE when it leaks accidentally into formal writing — when the writer didn't intend it and the reader stumbles. In analytical essays, use fragments SPARINGLY (1-2 per essay maximum) and ONLY for clear effect. Bottom rule: 'A fragment is a craft choice only if you can name WHY. If you can't name why, it's a mistake.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-10
Chart
Sentence-length variation rhythm anchor: 1-page reference with worked examples. RULE: vary sentence length within a paragraph. A paragraph of identical-length sentences is exhausting; a paragraph that varies in length pulls the reader through. EXAMPLE OF GOOD VARIATION (sentence lengths in words: 22, 8, 14, 5, 31): 'Maya Angelou opens the chapter with a sentence that compresses an entire childhood into a single concrete image. The image is the silence. She speaks of a silence so dense it became a presence in the room. A weight. By the end of the paragraph, the silence has become the chapter's controlling metaphor, a black-and-white photograph that the rest of the chapter develops in color.' MOVE 1 — VARY LENGTH: alternate long and short. MOVE 2 — VARY OPENING: don't open every sentence with the subject (subject-first all the time = monotonous). MOVE 3 — VARY STRUCTURE: mix simple, compound, complex, compound-complex. Bottom rule: 'Reading your draft aloud reveals rhythm. If you trip, your reader will too.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-11
Chart
Asyndeton / polysyndeton / anaphora anchor (rhetorical-listing craft moves): 3-band card. ASYNDETON — omitting conjunctions in a list. EXAMPLE: 'I came, I saw, I conquered.' (Caesar) EFFECT: speed, accumulation, momentum. The reader rushes through. POLYSYNDETON — piling conjunctions in a list. EXAMPLE: 'And the rain came and the cold came and the wind came and the dark came.' EFFECT: weight, inevitability, slowness. The reader is forced through each item. ANAPHORA — repeating an opening word or phrase at the start of successive clauses or sentences. EXAMPLE: 'We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills...' (Churchill) EFFECT: building intensity through repetition; ceremonial rhythm. Bottom rule: 'These three devices are tools in the syntactic toolkit. Use one or two per essay for clear effect — overuse exhausts the reader.' Worked example from Joy Harjo's anaphora-rich 'Remember.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-12
Chart
Dangling-participle 3-step repair anchor (CCSS L.7.1.c — high-frequency in analytical prose): 3-band card extending G7-fall MG-19. RULE: a participial phrase MUST modify the subject of the main clause. EXAMPLE OF DANGLING: 'Walking through the gallery, the paintings impressed me.' (Were the paintings walking?) STEP 1 — FIND THE PARTICIPLE: 'Walking through the gallery' is the participial phrase. STEP 2 — FIND WHAT IT SHOULD MODIFY: who was walking? ME (the speaker). STEP 3 — PLACE ADJACENT: 'Walking through the gallery, I was impressed by the paintings.' OR rewrite: 'As I walked through the gallery, the paintings impressed me.' MORE EXAMPLES: DANGLING — 'After reading the passage, the meaning became clear.' FIX — 'After reading the passage, I understood the meaning.' DANGLING — 'Buried in the appendix, I found the key statistic.' FIX — 'I found the key statistic buried in the appendix.' Bottom rule: 'Watch every sentence that opens with -ing or -ed. The subject of the main clause must be who/what is doing the participial action.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-13
Chart
Coordinate adjectives in literary description anchor (CCSS L.7.2.a continued from G7-fall): 1-page reference focused on literary prose. RULE: two adjectives that EQUALLY modify a noun take a comma. AND-TEST and COMMA-REVERSAL-TEST from G7-fall still apply. LITERARY DESCRIPTION EXAMPLES: COORDINATE (comma) — 'a quiet, watchful boy' (you can say 'quiet AND watchful'; you can reverse: 'a watchful, quiet boy'). 'the long, restless silence' (long AND restless; restless AND long). 'a tired, hopeful family' (tired AND hopeful; hopeful AND tired). CUMULATIVE (no comma) — 'a small wooden cabin' (NOT 'small AND wooden'; NOT 'wooden small cabin' — these are cumulative; second adjective is closer to noun in category). 'a famous American writer' (NOT 'famous AND American'; ordering is fixed). LITERARY NOTE: many novelists omit commas even where rules suggest them, for rhythm. In your analytical writing, follow the rule. When analyzing a writer's choice, NAME whether they followed or broke the rule and ask WHY. Bottom rule: 'In literary description, adjective stacking creates layered effect. Punctuation signals the relationship.' Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-14
Chart
Concision in analytical register anchor (CCSS L.7.3.a continued from G7-fall): 1-page reference extending G7-fall MG-21 to analytical writing. RULE: cut throat-clearers, hedge stacks, and empty filler. ANALYTICAL-REGISTER THROAT-CLEARERS TO CUT: 'In this essay I will argue that...' / 'It is interesting to note that...' / 'When we look closely at this passage we can see that...' / 'The author seems to be trying to suggest that...' FIX: start with the substance. 'Angelou's diction reveals...' HEDGE STACKS TO CUT: 'it might possibly perhaps seem to suggest that' → 'suggests'. 'arguably one could maybe say that' → 'arguably' or just 'I argue'. EMPTY FILLERS TO CUT: 'In conclusion' / 'In summary' / 'To sum up' (the reader knows it's the conclusion). 'It is important to remember that' → cut. 'It should be noted that' → cut. 'In a sense' / 'in a way' → often cuttable. ANALYTICAL CONCISION RULE: every sentence in an analytical paragraph should DO analytical work. If you can cut it and the analysis still stands, cut it. Bottom rule: 'Analytical concision is not minimalism — it is precision. Every word earns its place.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-15
Chart
Literal vs. figurative meaning anchor (CCSS L.7.5.a): 2-band card with worked examples. RULE: every literary phrase has at least two possible readings — LITERAL (what the words SAY at face value) and FIGURATIVE (what the words DO when read as metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, symbol). 2-CHECK ROUTINE: CHECK 1 — does the phrase work read LITERALLY? CHECK 2 — does the phrase work read FIGURATIVELY? Both? The writer may intend layered meaning. Only one? That's the intended meaning. WORKED EXAMPLE 1: 'The wind whispered through the trees.' LITERAL: wind makes a sound. FIGURATIVE: PERSONIFICATION (wind given human capacity to whisper). Both work; the figurative is the writer's primary intent. WORKED EXAMPLE 2: 'My homework is going to kill me.' LITERAL: homework will cause death. FIGURATIVE: HYPERBOLE (exaggeration for emphasis — speaker is overwhelmed). Only the figurative works in context. WORKED EXAMPLE 3: from Hughes's 'Harlem': 'What happens to a dream deferred? / Does it dry up / like a raisin in the sun?' LITERAL: a dream cannot literally dry up. FIGURATIVE: SIMILE (comparing dream to raisin). The figurative is the entire point — the question is how dreams change when delayed. Bottom rule: 'A LITERAL reading mistakes the figurative; a FIGURATIVE reading mistakes the literal. Skilled analysts check both.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-16
Chart
Word-relationship 4-category anchor (CCSS L.7.5.b): 4-quadrant card with examples. QUADRANT 1 — SYNONYM (similar meaning, different connotation/register): happy / joyful / elated / pleased. ANALYTICAL USE: a writer's CHOICE between synonyms reveals tone. QUADRANT 2 — ANTONYM (opposite meaning): hot / cold; loud / silent; abundant / scarce. ANALYTICAL USE: writers use antonyms to create CONTRAST — juxtaposition (T16 vocabulary). QUADRANT 3 — ANALOGY (A:B :: C:D structural relationship): sonnet:poem :: novel:fiction (both are member:category); pencil:write :: brush:paint (both are instrument:action). KEY: identify the RELATIONSHIP between the first pair, then find a parallel relationship for the second. QUADRANT 4 — CATEGORICAL (member-of-category, or part-of-whole): sonnet is a TYPE OF poem; petal is a PART OF flower; iambic pentameter is a TYPE OF meter. ANALYTICAL USE: categorical relationships organize literary terminology — the analyst maps the network. Bottom rule: 'Knowing how words relate to each other deepens understanding of both.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-17
Chart
Thesaurus literacy anchor (CCSS L.7.4.c): 1-page reference for using a thesaurus well. RULE: a thesaurus offers CANDIDATES, not equivalents. Two synonyms differ in CONNOTATION, REGISTER, and RHYTHM. The writer's job is to CHOOSE. WORKED EXAMPLE: original draft sentence: 'The story is sad.' Reach for thesaurus. Candidates for 'sad': sorrowful, melancholy, mournful, gloomy, dejected, despondent, doleful, woeful, downcast, blue, depressing, heartbreaking, tragic, somber, wistful. STEP 1 — CONNOTATION: which candidate matches the story's tone? 'Tragic' suggests catastrophic loss; 'wistful' suggests gentle longing; 'depressing' suggests emotional heaviness on the reader. STEP 2 — REGISTER: which candidate matches the essay's register? 'Doleful' is archaic/formal; 'blue' is informal. For an analytical essay, choose mid-register. STEP 3 — RHYTHM: how does the candidate sound in the sentence? 'The story is melancholy' (4 syllables) vs. 'The story is wistful' (2 syllables) — same meaning-territory, different cadence. STEP 4 — VERIFY in dictionary: look up your candidate. Does it actually mean what you think? Bottom rule: 'A thesaurus without a dictionary is a hazard. Two tools, used together.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-18
Chart
10-root literary-analysis morphology anchor (CCSS L.7.4.b extension): 10-cell grid. CELL 1 — CHRON/CHRONO (time): chronological, chronicle, anachronism, synchronize. CELL 2 — META (beyond, transformed): metaphor, metamorphosis, metaphysical, meta-analysis. CELL 3 — MONO (one): monologue, monotone, monolith, monosyllabic. CELL 4 — PAN (all): panorama, pandemic, panoply, pantheon. CELL 5 — PHON (sound): phoneme, phonics, symphony, cacophony. CELL 6 — RHET (orator, speaker): rhetoric, rhetorical, rhetorician. CELL 7 — SYM/SYN (together): symbol, sympathy, synthesis, syntax, synonym. CELL 8 — THE (god, divine): theology, atheist, theocracy, pantheon. CELL 9 — TROPH (nourish): trophy, atrophy, hypertrophy, dystrophy. CELL 10 — TURB (disturb): turbulent, perturb, disturbance, turbid. Each cell with 3-5 example words + brief etymology. Bottom rule: 'These 10 roots are the toolkit of literary-analysis vocabulary. Recognize a root, decode the word.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-19
Chart
Tier-2 Set 16 literary-analysis precision vocabulary anchor: 20-word grid. WORDS: diction, syntax, imagery, tone, mood, motif, symbol, characterization, point of view, irony, ambiguity, juxtaposition, allusion, foreshadowing, metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, paradox, theme. Each cell: word + 1-sentence definition + example-of-use-in-analysis ('Angelou's DICTION is sensory and concrete.' / 'The SYNTAX shifts from long flowing sentences to short fragments at the moment of trauma.' / 'The IMAGERY of caged birds runs through the chapter as a MOTIF.' / 'The POINT OF VIEW is first-person retrospective.' / 'Hughes uses HYPERBOLE in line 4 to amplify the speaker's outrage.'). Print-ready 18x24, dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-20
Chart
Three literary-theory lenses anchor (intro-level): 3-band card. LENS 1 — READER-RESPONSE (yellow): 'What does this text do to a READER — to me, with my experiences?' STARTER QUESTIONS: What did I notice first? Where did I pause? Where did I feel something? What did this remind me of? KEY: valid reader-response analysis is GROUNDED in the text (not just personal opinion). LENS 2 — FORMALIST (blue): 'What do the text's words, structure, and form DO — independent of author and reader?' STARTER QUESTIONS: What patterns repeat? Where does the structure shift? What does the diction concentrate on? How does the form (sonnet, free verse, paragraph shape) carry meaning? KEY: formalist analysis stays inside the text. LENS 3 — HISTORICAL/CULTURAL (red): 'What world produced this text — when, where, by whom, for whom?' STARTER QUESTIONS: What was happening when this was written? What does the writer's background bring? Who was the original audience? What references would they have caught that I might miss? KEY: historical/cultural analysis connects text to world. Bottom rule: 'Different lenses produce different valid readings. A skilled analyst NAMES the lens.' Worked example: Hughes's 'Harlem' read through all three lenses. Print-ready 18x24.
MG-21
Chart
Notice & Note 4-signpost anchor (Beers & Probst, reduced for G7 analytical): 4-band card. SIGNPOST 1 — CONTRASTS AND CONTRADICTIONS: a character does something opposite of what we expect, or two ideas in the text contradict. ANALYSIS PROMPT: 'Why might the character/text be acting/saying that?' SIGNPOST 2 — WORDS OF THE WISER: an older or wiser character offers advice to the protagonist. ANALYSIS PROMPT: 'What's the life lesson, and how might it shape the protagonist?' SIGNPOST 3 — AGAIN AND AGAIN: a word, image, phrase, or event repeats. ANALYSIS PROMPT: 'Why is this repeating? What MOTIF is forming?' SIGNPOST 4 — MEMORY MOMENT: the narrative pauses to recall a past event. ANALYSIS PROMPT: 'Why might this memory be important here?' Bottom rule: 'Signposts are starter cues, not answers. They tell you WHERE to slow down; analysis happens through close reading.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-22
Chart
Sentence-shape diagram tutorial anchor: 1-page reference showing how to visualize sentence shape. METHOD 1 — UNDERLINING: independent clauses underlined solid; dependent clauses underlined dashed; phrases (appositive, participial, gerund, infinitive) underlined dotted. METHOD 2 — BRACKETING: [main clause] {appositive phrase} (participial phrase). METHOD 3 — DIAGRAMMING: a simplified tree showing subject / verb / object / modifier hierarchy. WORKED EXAMPLE: 'Maya Angelou, a poet and memoirist, captured the texture of childhood with sentences that move like music.' DIAGRAM: [Maya Angelou {a poet and memoirist} captured the texture of childhood (with sentences) (that move like music)]. Bottom rule: 'Diagramming a mentor sentence reveals its architecture. Architecture is craft.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-23
Chart
Sentences I admire notebook anchor: 1-page template. INSTRUCTIONS: 'Across this term, collect 10-15 sentences you admire from your mentor texts. For each: (1) copy the sentence verbatim with citation (author, page); (2) name the moves you see (e.g., periodic / appositive / fragment / anaphora); (3) write 1-2 sentences on WHY you admire it (rhythm, precision, imagery, surprise); (4) try writing your own sentence in the same shape on a different topic.' EXAMPLE ENTRY: SENTENCE: 'Through every doubt, every silence, every long winter night, she kept writing.' (Mentor sentence). MOVES: periodic; anaphora ('every'); accumulating phrases. WHY ADMIRED: the delay builds anticipation; the final clause lands with weight; the repetition of 'every' makes it feel inevitable. MY IMITATION: 'Through every test, every late night, every doubt, he kept studying.' Bottom rule: 'Sentence-imitation is one of the oldest writing-practice routines. Imitation builds craft.' Print-ready 8.5x11 to glue into writers' notebook.
MG-24
Chart
Writing-conference protocol anchor: 5-minute structure card. RULE: a writing conference is 5 minutes, structured. OPENER (30 sec): 'What are you working on today? What's the question on your mind?' WHAT'S WORKING (60 sec): teacher names one specific strength in the current draft — a sentence that lands, a claim that's sharp, an analysis that goes beyond summary. ONE GROWTH MOVE (180 sec): teacher and student identify ONE move to try (not five). Specific. Actionable. Example: 'Try opening this paragraph with a periodic sentence — delay the main clause.' Or: 'Your evidence here is strong, but the analysis stops at restating it. Add two sentences that name the diction.' NEXT STEP (30 sec): 'I'll see this revision when?' Conference logged in conference notebook (student name + date + growth move + next step). Bottom rule: 'Conferences are about ONE move. Five minutes. Specific. Followed up.' Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-25
Chart
Physical / non-image
3-pass peer-revision rubric adapted for analytical essays: 3-band stacked card extending G7-fall MG-28. PASS 1 — CONTENT (purple, 14 criteria adapted for analytical essay): thesis is a clear analytical claim (not a topic) / introduction has hook + context + thesis + 3-part roadmap / each body paragraph follows CEA structure / claims are sub-claims more specific than thesis / evidence is quoted with quote-sandwich integration / analysis names language moves (diction/syntax/imagery/tone) and goes beyond summary / conclusion synthesizes the three sub-claims / so-what is offered / paragraph order follows roadmap / 3-pass close reading is visible (annotations referenced or noted) / chosen lens (reader-response/formalist/historical-cultural) is named in introduction / textual evidence is well-chosen (not weak / not redundant) / at least 6 textual citations / interpretation goes beyond the obvious. PASS 2 — SENTENCE-LEVEL (blue, 12 criteria adapted for analytical syntactic-variety arc): four sentence types varied (at least one of each) / at least one periodic OR cumulative sentence used deliberately / at least one appositive / participial / gerund / OR infinitive phrase used / at least one deliberate fragment OR explanation of why none used / sentence-length variation within paragraphs / no dangling participles / no misplaced modifiers / coordinate adjectives punctuated correctly / wordiness audit applied (no obvious throat-clearers, hedge stacks, or empty filler) / active voice default / signal phrases varied / interpretive sentences after quotes go beyond restating. PASS 3 — MECHANICS (green, 12 criteria adapted for analytical essay): formal essay formatting (1-inch margins, double-spaced, header with last name + page number) / titles of works italicized or quoted correctly / spelling clean (dictionary verified) / capitalization clean / punctuation clean / pronoun case correct / pronoun consistency / comma rules followed (coordinate adjectives, introductory phrases, appositives) / quotation marks placed correctly with parenthetical citation outside / no run-ons / no comma splices / no sentence over 35 words without justification. Bottom rule: 'ONE PASS AT A TIME.' Print-ready 18x24.
MG-26
Chart
Status-of-class spring chart (analytical-essay workshop): 6-stage horizontal chart for the analytical-essay workflow. STAGES: 1. CLOSE READ (annotate the passage) — magnifying-glass icon. 2. CLAIM (formulate the thesis) — gavel icon. 3. EVIDENCE (gather quoted passages) — quote-mark icon. 4. ANALYSIS (draft CEA paragraphs) — gear icon. 5. REVISE (3-pass peer + writing conference) — arrow-loop icon. 6. SHOWCASE (oral close-reading) — microphone icon. Each child has a magnetic name-tile moved into the column. Each column has 1-sentence definition. Print-ready 18x24.
MG-27
Chart
Literary Analysis Showcase visual-aid criteria anchor: 3-option card. RULE: the visual aid MUST make your interpretation VISIBLE. It is not decoration. OPTION A — ANNOTATED-PASSAGE POSTER: the passage printed at large scale (24x36 tri-fold) with your annotations in the 5-color toolkit visible; thesis printed across the top; 3-4 marginal notes naming the key craft moves; Tier-2 vocabulary terms used in marginal notes. OPTION B — SLIDE WITH PASSAGE + CRAFT MOVES MARKED: 4-6 slides, 16:9 ratio. Slide 1: title + thesis. Slide 2-4: passage with one craft move circled per slide; analysis printed below. Slide 5: conclusion synthesizing analysis. Slide 6: works cited (the text being analyzed). OPTION C — CONCEPT-MAP OF THEME/MOTIF: a visual diagram showing how a theme (e.g., silence in Angelou) develops across the passage, with quoted evidence anchored to nodes. 11x17 single page. OPTION D — SENTENCE-SHAPE DIAGRAM: for syntactic-craft analyses — diagram 2-3 key sentences from the passage showing periodic/cumulative structure, appositive/participial phrases, fragments. Bottom rule: 'The visual makes thinking VISIBLE. Choose the format that best serves YOUR analysis.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-28
Chart
Literary Analysis Showcase presentation script template: 1-page script card. SECTION 1 — HOOK (10-15 sec): an opening line that frames the text — a quoted phrase, a question, a striking image. SECTION 2 — TEXT + THESIS (15-20 sec): name the text + author + your analytical thesis. SECTION 3 — CLOSE READ (45-60 sec): walk the audience through one passage. Point to your visual. Name 2-3 key craft moves (diction / syntax / imagery / tone) and what they do. Use Tier-2 Set 16 vocabulary aloud. SECTION 4 — SO-WHAT (10-15 sec): why does this reading matter? What does it reveal about the writer's craft or the text's meaning? SECTION 5 — Q&A PREP (separate notes): 3 likely audience questions with prepared answers. TOTAL: 90 seconds. NOTES: oral close-reading = LIVE close reading; speak to your visual; don't read your essay. Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-29
Chart
Physical / non-image
Analytical-essay self-reflection rubric (assessment-as-learning): 3-2-1 reflection template extended for G7-spring. THREE STRENGTHS in your analytical essay (with quoted lines showing close-reading depth and syntactic variety). TWO REVISION TARGETS for next time (specific moves named — e.g., 'I want to use PERIODIC sentences more deliberately to delay emphasis' or 'I want to push my analysis beyond restating the evidence by naming the diction'). ONE GOAL for G8-fall (the next writing unit — multi-source synthesis + formal style). Bottom rule: 'Reflection turns work into learning.' Print-ready 8.5x11.
MG-30
Chart
Workshop calendar (18-week spring): visual timeline. Weeks 1-2: close-reading launch + mentor text 1 (Angelou) + 3-pass routine + 5-color annotation toolkit + Tier-2 Set 16 launch. Weeks 3-4: mentor texts 2-3 (Achebe/Cisneros) + CEA paragraph introduction + literal-vs-figurative meaning. Weeks 5-6: phrase-type taxonomy (appositive / participial / gerund / infinitive) + dangling-participle continuation + L.7.5.b 4-category word relationships. Weeks 7-9: analytical-essay launch + thesis-construction + 3-paragraph practice essay + writing conferences begin. Week 9: midterm assessment. Weeks 10-12: periodic-vs-cumulative + deliberate fragments + sentence-length variation + asyndeton/polysyndeton/anaphora. Weeks 13-15: full 5-paragraph analytical-essay drafting + 3-pass peer revision + writing conferences continued + concision in analytical register + thesaurus literacy. Weeks 16-17: literary-theory lenses (reader-response / formalist / historical-cultural) introduction + lens-application in essay revision. Week 18: Literary Analysis Showcase oral close-reading + self-reflection + G8 preview. Print-ready 18x24.
MG-31
Video
Physical / non-image
6:00 model of a Grade-7 analyst applying the 3-pass close reading routine to a short passage from Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. Multicultural student opens the passage. PASS 1 SAY: she summarizes the passage in 2 sentences. PASS 2 DO: she pulls the 5-color highlighter kit and annotates — blue for diction (circles 'silence,' 'weight,' 'presence'), green for imagery (the room described in sensory detail), purple for syntax shift (a long flowing sentence followed by a fragment), red for tone shift (from neutral to wistful), orange for ambiguity (a marginal question: 'why does she repeat silence?'). PASS 3 MEAN: she states a claim — 'Angelou uses concrete diction and a syntax shift to make silence into a physical presence in the room.' Voiceover narrates each pass. Caption track on.
MG-32
Video
Physical / non-image
6:00 model of a Grade-7 analyst building a CEA analytical paragraph. Student has a thesis: 'Angelou makes silence into a physical presence through concrete diction and syntactic compression.' Voiceover walks through: CLAIM (one sub-claim: 'Angelou's diction transforms silence from an abstraction into a concrete thing.'). EVIDENCE (a quoted phrase from the passage with quote-sandwich integration: 'For instance, the narrator describes "a silence so dense it became a presence in the room" (Angelou 47).'). ANALYSIS (4 sentences naming the language work: 'The word "dense" carries a connotation of physical weight — silence as something that takes up space. The metaphor "a presence" personifies the silence, giving it the capacity to be in a room as a person might. The sentence's length amplifies this: by the time we reach "presence," the silence has accumulated through every preceding word. This concrete diction transforms what could have been an abstract emotional state into an embodied experience the reader can almost see and feel.'). Student types each part. Then reviews — does the analysis go beyond restating? Yes — it names connotation, names the figure (personification), and connects diction to embodied experience. Multicultural classroom. Caption track on.
MG-33
Video
Physical / non-image
6:00 model of a Grade-7 analyst working with the four phrase types. Student has a draft sentence: 'Maya Angelou captured the texture of childhood.' Voiceover walks through expansions using each phrase type. APPOSITIVE PHRASE: 'Maya Angelou, a poet and memoirist, captured the texture of childhood.' (added noun phrase renaming Angelou). PARTICIPIAL PHRASE: 'Writing from the perspective of her childhood self, Maya Angelou captured the texture of those years.' (-ing phrase modifying Angelou). GERUND PHRASE: 'Capturing the texture of childhood is the achievement of Maya Angelou's memoir.' (gerund as subject). INFINITIVE PHRASE: 'To capture the texture of childhood is to honor it.' (infinitive as subject). Each expansion shown side-by-side; voiceover names the move. Multicultural classroom. Caption track on.
MG-34
Video
Physical / non-image
6:00 model of a Grade-7 analyst working with periodic and cumulative sentences. Student has a flat sentence: 'She kept writing through doubt and silence and long winter nights.' Voiceover walks through two re-shapes. PERIODIC: 'Through every doubt, every silence, every long winter night, she kept writing.' (subordinate phrases first; main clause delayed; emphasis lands on 'she kept writing'). CUMULATIVE: 'She kept writing, through doubt, through silence, through long winter nights.' (main clause first; modifiers accumulate). Voiceover names the effect of each — periodic builds anticipation; cumulative expands. Student then chooses which shape best serves her paragraph and why. Multicultural classroom. Caption track on.
MG-35
Video
Physical / non-image
5:00 model of a 5-minute teacher writing conference. Multicultural Grade-7 student sits beside teacher with her draft on the desk. OPENER (30 sec): teacher asks 'What are you working on?' Student names her current revision focus (a body paragraph where analysis is thin). WHAT'S WORKING (60 sec): teacher names a specific strength — the appositive phrase in paragraph 2 that adds rhythm without breaking the flow. ONE GROWTH MOVE (3 min): teacher and student look at the weak analysis paragraph together. Teacher asks one diagnostic question ('What does the word "dense" do in this evidence?'). Student answers — 'it makes the silence feel physical.' Teacher names the move ('You just said it — add that sentence to your analysis. Don't restate the quote; name what the diction is doing.'). Student marks the draft. NEXT STEP (30 sec): teacher logs conference; student commits to revising by tomorrow. Caption track on.
MG-36
Video
Physical / non-image
5:00 model of a Grade-7 Literary Analysis Showcase oral close-reading. Student stands beside a tri-fold poster (matching MG-27 Option A — annotated passage with 5-color toolkit visible). She delivers a 90-second presentation following MG-28 script template. Hook: a quoted phrase from the passage. Text + thesis: names Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, states her analytical claim about diction and silence. Close read: walks the audience through three craft moves she has marked on the poster — points to her blue-highlighted 'dense,' her green-highlighted imagery, her purple-highlighted syntax shift — and names what each does. So-what: why this reading matters — what it reveals about how memoir can make memory physical. Audience asks 2 questions during Q&A; student answers using Tier-2 Set 16 vocabulary. Multicultural classroom. Caption track on.
MG-37
Chart
Mentor-text reading packet table-of-contents anchor: 1-page reference listing the 15 curated literary mentor texts available for analytical-essay topic choice. ORGANIZED BY GENRE. POETRY: Angelou 'Still I Rise' / 'Phenomenal Woman'; Hughes 'Harlem' / 'I, Too' / 'Mother to Son'; Nye 'Famous' / 'Kindness'; Harjo 'Remember'; Neruda 'Ode to a Watermelon' (translated). SHORT FICTION / VIGNETTE: Cisneros 'My Name' / 'Those Who Don't' (Mango Street); Tan 'Two Kinds' (Joy Luck Club); Díaz 'How to Date...' (excerpt); Danticat 'New York Day Women.' MEMOIR / NARRATIVE NONFICTION EXCERPT: Angelou ch. 1 of I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings; Achebe excerpt from Things Fall Apart; Anaya excerpt from Bless Me, Ultima. ESSAY: Tan 'Mother Tongue'; Baldwin 'Notes of a Native Son' (excerpt); Didion 'On Keeping a Notebook'; Hogan essay from Dwellings. Each text Lexile-rated 800-1100. Bottom rule: 'Choose the text that calls you. Your analytical engagement depends on your interest.' Print-ready 11x17.
Lessons (20)
Skills (20)
- Use appositive phrases as a sentence-expansion move (CCSS L.7.1.a) G7
- Cut throat-clearers, hedge stacks, and empty filler from analytical writing (CCSS L.7.3.a applied) G7
- Punctuate coordinate adjectives in literary description (CCSS L.7.2.a continued) G7
- Use gerund phrases as nouns in analytical prose (CCSS L.7.1.a) G7
- Use infinitive phrases as nouns, adjectives, and adverbs (CCSS L.7.1.a) G7
- Use participial phrases and avoid dangling participles (CCSS L.7.1.a; L.7.1.c) G7
- Spell correctly using print and digital reference materials (CCSS L.7.2.b) G7
- Apply the 3-pass close reading routine (Pass 1 SAY / Pass 2 DO / Pass 3 MEAN) (CCSS RL.7.1; RL.7.4) G7
- Use asyndeton, polysyndeton, and anaphora as literary listing and opening devices (CCSS L.7.5.a; RL.7.4) G7
- Deploy syntactic variety as a craft move — periodic, cumulative, fragment, sentence-length rhythm (CCSS L.7.1.b applied) G7
- Apply three literary-theory lenses — reader-response, formalist, historical/cultural (intro level) G7
- Distinguish literal vs. figurative meanings of words and phrases in context (CCSS L.7.5.a) G7
- Decode words using 10 literary-analysis Greek and Latin roots (CCSS L.7.4.b) G7
- Use a thesaurus strategically — choose by connotation, register, and rhythm (CCSS L.7.4.c) G7
- Acquire and use Tier-2 Set 16 literary-analysis precision vocabulary (CCSS L.7.6) G7
- Identify and use word-relationships across four categories — synonym, antonym, analogy, categorical (CCSS L.7.5.b) G7
- Compose a 5-paragraph analytical essay with CEA body structure and syntactic variety (CCSS W.7.1.a-e; W.7.2.a-f; W.7.4-6) G7
- Construct a CEA analytical paragraph (Claim / Evidence / Analysis) (CCSS W.7.1.a-b; W.7.9.a) G7
- Revise an analytical essay through 3 peer-revision passes and 2 teacher writing conferences (CCSS W.7.5) G7
Assessments (3)
- Summative week 18 100 min covers 20 skills
- Summative week 9 75 min covers 9 skills
- Self Reflection Assessment As Learning ongoing — after midterm CEA paragraph (week 9) and after Showcase (week 18) 15 min covers 0 skills
Standards alignment
Pedagogical anchors
-
Graham & Perin 'Writing Next' (Carnegie Corporation 2007) — PRIMARY anchor at G6+ — explicit strategy instruction (0.82); summarization (0.82); collaborative writing (0.75); specific product goals (0.70); sentence-combining (0.50); study of models (0.25); writing for content learning (0.23). At G7-spring, the named strategies are (a) the CEA paragraph routine, (b) the close-reading multi-pass routine, (c) the periodic-vs-cumulative sentence-shape routine, (d) the deliberate-fragment routine, (e) the dangling-participle 3-step repair routine, (f) the literal-vs-figurative meaning check routine.
Explicit strategy instruction through the named routines in lessons 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16. Summarization — the objective-summary skill (RL.7.2) drilled before analysis can begin. Specific product goals — a 5-paragraph analytical essay (1500-2000 words) with at least 6 textual citations, deliberate use of all 4 sentence types, at least 2 examples of syntactic variety moves (periodic OR cumulative OR fragment OR anaphora), and a clear CEA structure in every body paragraph. Study of models — 5 mentor analytical essays (Angelou, Achebe, Tan, Junot Díaz literary criticism excerpts, teacher-modeled exemplars). Sentence-combining — periodic-vs-cumulative shape work in lesson 10. Collaborative writing — 3-pass peer revision retained AND formal writing conferences with the teacher introduced (Calkins/Atwell).
-
The Writing Revolution / Hochman Method (Hochman & Wexler) — sentence-level routines continued at G7-spring. The four sentence types drilled with new ANALYTICAL register. APPOSITIVE-phrase, PARTICIPIAL-phrase, GERUND-phrase, INFINITIVE-phrase sentence-expansion routines as named moves. Sentence-combining for analytical synthesis (combining quote + analysis into one tightly-built sentence). The because/but/so/although/however/whereas/while triad applied to analytical claim-evidence-analysis.
Hochman is the engine for sentence-level work. The phrase-type taxonomy (appositive / participial / gerund / infinitive) drilled in lessons 6-7. Sentence-combining drives evidence-integration — students take a quote and an analytical sentence and combine them with a participial or appositive into one sentence. The although/while/however triad applied to counterclaim moves within an analytical essay.
-
Beck & McKeown 'Bringing Words to Life' — three-encounter Tier-2 vocabulary. G7-spring focuses on LITERARY-ANALYSIS precision words (diction, syntax, imagery, tone, mood, motif, symbol, characterization, point of view, irony, ambiguity, juxtaposition, allusion, foreshadowing, metaphor, simile, personification, hyperbole, paradox, theme — Tier-2 Set 16). Three-encounter pattern: introduce in mentor-text close reading → use in analytical writing → defend in oral close-reading at Showcase.
Tier-2 Set 16 launched across lessons 1-14 with literary-analysis precision. Three-encounter pattern enforced: encounter in mentor close-readings (lessons 2-4), use in analytical-essay drafting (lessons 8-13), defend in oral close-reading at Literary Analysis Showcase (lesson 20).
-
Lucy Calkins' Units of Study — Grade 7 Literary Essay. The Calkins unit centers on close reading of literature, claim-development from textual evidence, and analytical-essay drafting with formal writing conferences. Mini-lesson + workshop + share format. The 'writerly noticing' move applied to mentor analytical essays — name the moves you see.
Multi-week workshop: PIECE 1 = close-reading portfolio of 3 short passages (lessons 3-5, weeks 1-3); PIECE 2 = analytical essay (lessons 8-18, weeks 4-15); PIECE 3 = oral close-reading at Literary Analysis Showcase (lessons 19-20, weeks 16-18). Calkins-style mini-lesson-work-share daily format. FORMAL WRITING CONFERENCES introduced — 5-minute one-on-one teacher conferences scheduled across weeks 6-14.
-
Nancie Atwell 'In the Middle' — workshop format for adolescent writers. Writing conferences as the heart of the workshop. Status-of-class daily check on writing-process stage. Atwell's voice on adolescent writers' identity informs the analytical-essay-as-identity-formation framing — to analyze is to take a position grounded in evidence.
Atwell's writing-conference protocol introduced formally in lesson 9. Each student gets at least 2 conferences during the analytical-essay arc (weeks 4-15). Status-of-class chart redesigned for the analytical-essay workflow (MG-30). Writers' notebooks for close-reading notes.
-
Kelly Gallagher 'Write Like This' and 'Readicide' / Jim Burke 'The English Teacher's Companion' — modeling the analytical-essay move explicitly and the 'I do, we do, you do' gradual-release protocol applied to analytical-paragraph and analytical-essay construction. Gallagher's mentor-text-as-model-then-write routine.
Gradual-release applied lesson by lesson — teacher models a CEA paragraph (I do), class co-constructs one (we do), students write one independently (you do). Lessons 8, 10, 12, 14 follow this protocol. Gallagher's mentor-text-as-model routine in lessons 2-4 (mentor close-readings).
-
Carol Booth Olson 'The Reading/Writing Connection' and Cris Tovani 'I Read It, but I Don't Get It' — close-reading-as-meaning-making routines for adolescents. The annotation toolkit (underline diction; circle imagery; bracket structural shifts; star tone shifts; question mark for ambiguity). Three-pass close reading: first pass = what does it SAY? second pass = what does it DO with language? third pass = what does it MEAN?
Three-pass close-reading routine introduced in lesson 3 and used throughout. Annotation toolkit anchored in MG-8 and applied to every mentor-text close reading. The 'what does it say / what does it do / what does it mean' three-question frame becomes the close-reading discipline of the term.
-
Strunk & White 'The Elements of Style' and Williams & Bizup 'Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace' — concision routines extended to ANALYTICAL register. Strunk's 'omit needless words' applied to analytical-essay openings (cut throat-clearers like 'In this essay I will argue that'). Williams' actor-action clarity routine ('Angelou uses imagery to convey...' is stronger than 'There is a use of imagery by Angelou to convey...'). The 7-pattern wordiness audit from G7-fall maintained and applied.
Concision as a named craft move in analytical register — lessons 11 and 13. Williams' actor-action routine deepens G6's Paramedic Method and G7-fall's 7-pattern audit. Applied in Pass-2 sentence-level peer revision.
-
Stanley Fish 'How to Write a Sentence' and Virginia Tufte 'Artful Sentences: Syntax as Style' — sentence rhythm, periodic vs. cumulative sentences, deliberate fragments. Fish's premise — the sentence is the unit of thinking; sentence-rhythm is meaning. Tufte's catalog of syntactic options as a writer's toolkit. Both anchor the syntactic-variety arc.
Lesson 10 (periodic vs. cumulative sentences); lesson 12 (deliberate fragments and sentence-length variation); lesson 14 (asyndeton / polysyndeton / anaphora as listing and opening devices). Mentor-sentence study using Fish's and Tufte's analytic lens. Students keep a 'sentences I admire' notebook section.
-
Bear, Invernizzi, Templeton, Johnston 'Words Their Way' — Greek and Latin roots/affixes maintained from G7-fall. New literary-analysis morphology cluster (chron/chrono = time; meta = beyond; mono = one; pan = all; phon = sound; rhet = orator; sym/syn = together; the = god/divine; troph = nourish; turb = disturb). Word-relationship sorts: synonym/antonym/analogy/categorical (L.7.5.b expanded).
10 new literary-analysis roots distributed across weeks 2-15 (Friday spiral). Word-relationship sorts in lessons 15 and 17 (4-category system). Etymology look-up routine maintained as a daily close-reading habit. Thesaurus literacy mini-arc in lesson 11 (choose-by-connotation not substitute).
-
Lemov 'Teach Like a Champion 3.0' — discussion protocols COLD CALL, TURN AND TALK, EVERYBODY WRITES, SHOW CALL maintained from G7-fall. STRONG VOICE for analytical insistence ('show me where the text says that — name the diction'). FORMAT MATTERS for analytical register and Standard English.
Cold Call in close-reading discussions (lessons 3-5) to ensure every student names a textual feature. Turn and Talk before each writing move. Show Call in lessons 8, 10, 13, 16 — a chosen student's draft displayed for whole-class noticing. Strong Voice for evidence-grounding — the teacher's habitual 'show me where' becomes the analytical norm.
-
Anne Lamott 'Bird by Bird' and Donald Murray 'A Writer Teaches Writing' — the SHITTY FIRST DRAFT permission maintained. Adapted for analytical-essay anxiety: 'your first reading of a passage is allowed to be wrong; close reading is rereading.' Murray's 'the writer's purpose is to discover' frames analysis-as-inquiry.
Process framing in lesson 8 (analytical essay launch). Murray's discovery framing in lesson 3 (close reading as discovery, not extraction). Lamott applied to drafting confidence in lesson 12. Anti-perfectionism move for ELLs and writing-anxious students.
-
Robert Probst & Kylene Beers 'Notice and Note: Strategies for Close Reading' — six literary signposts (Contrasts and Contradictions, Aha Moment, Tough Questions, Words of the Wiser, Again and Again, Memory Moment) as close-reading scaffolds for adolescents. Used as starter lenses for identifying what's WORTH analyzing.
Notice & Note literary signposts as the close-reading scaffold in lessons 3-5. Each signpost cued in mentor texts as an entry point for analytical claim-formation. Reduced to 4 most relevant for G7 analytical-essay work (Contrasts and Contradictions, Words of the Wiser, Again and Again, Memory Moment).
Depth bar
CCSS by introducing the FORMAL ANALYTICAL ESSAY as the term's primary writing arc — a 5-paragraph literary or rhetorical analysis essay with explicit CLAIM-EVIDENCE-ANALYSIS body structure (the CEA pattern, extending G6's Claim-Evidence-Warrant and G7-fall's Quote-Sandwich into a discipline-specific analytical move), by teaching CLOSE READING as a formal disciplinary practice (a Grade 8-9 stretch — the slow, multi-pass reading of a literary or informational passage that notices diction, syntax, imagery, structure, and tone before interpreting), by introducing literary-analysis precision vocabulary (diction, syntax, imagery, tone, mood, motif, symbol, characterization, point of view, irony — Tier-2 Set 16) as a working toolkit, by teaching SYNTACTIC VARIETY as a NAMED CRAFT MOVE in its own right (not merely a sentence-type drill) — sentence rhythm as a literary tool, PERIODIC vs. CUMULATIVE sentence shape, deliberate FRAGMENTS for effect, sentence-length variation as breath and emphasis, ASYNDETON and POLYSYNDETON as listing devices, ANAPHORA as opening repetition (extending G6-spring's rhetorical-devices arc into the analytical-prose register), by deepening L.7.1 PHRASES AND CLAUSES with FORMAL TAXONOMY of PHRASE TYPES — APPOSITIVE phrases (a noun phrase renaming another noun, often set off by commas: 'Maya Angelou, a poet and memoirist, ...'), PARTICIPIAL phrases (a phrase opening with a participle that modifies a noun: 'Walking through the gallery, she paused...'), GERUND phrases (an -ing form functioning as a noun: 'Reading slowly is the discipline of close reading'), INFINITIVE phrases (to + verb base functioning as noun/adjective/adverb: 'To read carefully is to read twice') — a Grade 8 expectation that we introduce systematically at G7-spring, by teaching DANGLING-PARTICIPLE detection as a high-frequency analytical-prose error (the participial phrase must modify the subject of the main clause), by teaching L.7.2.a COORDINATE ADJECTIVES IN LITERARY DESCRIPTION — multi-adjective descriptive sequences in fiction and the comma rules that govern them, by formally teaching L.7.3 CONCISE PRECISE LANGUAGE in ANALYTICAL register — eliminating throat-clearers from analytical openings ('In this essay I will argue that...' → 'Angelou's diction reveals...'), eliminating tentative hedge stacks ('it might possibly perhaps seem to suggest that...' → 'suggests'), eliminating empty academic filler ('In conclusion, in summary, to sum up...'), by deepening L.7.4-6 vocabulary with LITERAL vs. FIGURATIVE meaning analysis as a primary close-reading move (a literal reading mistakes the figurative; a figurative reading mistakes the literal — neither alone is sufficient), by teaching WORD-RELATIONSHIPS as a 4-category system extending G7-fall homograph work — SYNONYM (similar meaning), ANTONYM (opposite meaning), ANALOGY (A:B :: C:D structural relationship), CATEGORICAL (member-of-category — sonnet:poem :: novel:fiction), by teaching THESAURUS LITERACY as a Grade 8 stretch — choosing among synonyms based on connotation, register, and rhythm rather than substitution (a thesaurus offers candidates, not equivalents; the writer chooses), by introducing INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY THEORY at a child-appropriate level — three lenses (READER-RESPONSE: what does the text do to a reader? FORMALIST: what do the text's words, structure, and form do? HISTORICAL/CULTURAL: what world produced this text?) as starter frames for analysis (a Grade 9-10 stretch introduced as scaffolded lenses, not formal theory), by teaching FORMAL MULTI-PASS REVISION with a deepened 3-pass discipline (Pass 1 CONTENT focused on analytical depth and CEA structure; Pass 2 SENTENCE focused on syntactic variety and concision; Pass 3 MECHANICS focused on punctuation including coordinate-adjective comma and modifier placement) and FORMAL WRITING CONFERENCES with the teacher (a Calkins/Atwell core move — 5-minute one-on-one conferences scheduled across the workshop), by closing with the LITERARY ANALYSIS SHOWCASE (a public-presentation event where students share their analytical essays through 90-second oral close-readings of one passage with a visual aid that makes their interpretation visible). The volume target is 14-20 skills, 18-24 lessons, 45-65 exercises, ≥35 media items, file size up to ~340 KB