eng.g5.f.lesson_20.peer_edit_cycle_2_revision_act
Peer-Edit Cycle 2 and Acting on Suggested Moves
- Students complete second peer-edit cycle with a different partner.
- Students act on at least 5 suggested moves from peer-edit cycles 1 and 2.
Lesson plan
Warm-up
5 minChildren re-read their revised draft (post-cycle-1 + homework). Note 2 places where cycle-2 input could help.
- Provide silent reading time
- Affirm specific noticings
Direct instruction
10 minToday is peer-edit cycle 2 with a DIFFERENT partner. The structure is the same as cycle 1 but the focus shifts. Cycle 1 focused on STRUCTURAL feedback (TEEL bands, citation, audience). Cycle 2 should focus on STYLE feedback (word choice, sentence variety, link variation, synthesis). Same rubric, different lens. After peer-edit cycle 2, you have suggestions from TWO different readers. The next step: ACT ON at least 5 suggestions across cycles 1 and 2. Children who act on 5+ moves between cycles show measurable improvement. Watch teacher demonstrate acting on a peer suggestion. PEER NOTE: 'Body 2 LINK sentence is identical to body 1 LINK sentence — could vary?' WRITER ACTION: 'Re-read body 1 LINK: This is the first reason. Re-read body 2 LINK: This is the second reason. I will vary body 2 LINK to: Beyond pacing the sentences, this pause-creation is the second way verse form serves memoir.' WRITER MARK: green-pencil annotation 'CYCLE 2 / MOVE 3 — VARY LINK.'
-
Acting on moves requires understanding WHY the peer noted them, not just fixing the surface. Re-read the named move in MG-22 before acting.model See narrative.prompt Teacher demonstrates acting on one peer note.
- What is the difference between cycle 1 and cycle 2 focus?
- How many moves should you act on across both cycles?
M-5-F-WR-20-A
Chart
11x17 chart showing peer note in red on left, writer action in green on right. Annotation 'CYCLE 2 / MOVE 3 — VARY LINK' visible at margin. Print-ready, dyslexic-friendly font.
Guided practice
25 min-
Peer-edit with a NEW partner. Use MG-13 rubric focusing on STYLE feedback this time.scaffold MG-13 fresh sheet; peer-edit conversation card
-
Act on at least 5 suggestions (from cycles 1 and 2 combined). Annotate each with green-pencil margin note.scaffold MG-22 revision-moves anchor; suggestions from peer-edit cycles in hand
M-5-F-WR-20-B
Illustration
Reference image of a Grade-5 child's draft with green-pencil margin annotations showing 'CYCLE 1 — MOVE X' or 'CYCLE 2 — MOVE Y' notations throughout. Print-ready 8.5x11.
Formative assessment
3 min- Show your post-cycle-2 draft with 5+ acted-on moves annotated.
- Move status-tile to PUBLISH.
Closure
2 min- Star the move that improved your draft most across both cycles.
- Predict: tomorrow we meet the LITERARY ESSAY stretch genre.
Homework
10 min- At home tonight, read your final post-cycle-2 draft aloud. Bring to PUBLISH stage tomorrow.
Exercises in this lesson
Differentiation
- Same partner for cycle 2 if rotation is hard
- Move-suggestion list with 5 starred
- Reduced target: 3 moves acted on
- Peer-edit a third partner.
- Apply 8+ moves across both cycles.
- Bilingual rubric labels
- Conference in home language allowed
- Same partner; reduced target: 2 moves acted on
- Adult scribe for annotations
Teacher notes
Peer-edit cycle 2 is where children differentiate between structural and stylistic feedback. The act-on step is the cognitive payoff — children who act on suggestions develop self-edit capacity. Watch for: (1) defensive children who reject every suggestion (push for at least 2 acted-on); (2) compliant children who accept every suggestion without thinking (push for one rejection with justification). Cycle 2 closes the workshop arc before lesson 21's stretch.