eng.g7.f.lesson_18.peer_revision_pass_three_mechanics
Pass 3 MECHANICS peer revision — MLA formatting, citation precision, spelling, register
- Apply MLA 9th-edition in-text parenthetical citation (6 placement cases) (CCSS W.7.8)
- Build MLA 9th-edition Works Cited entries across 5 source types (book, scholarly article, journalistic article, website, interview) (CCSS W.7.8; W.8.8 entry)
- Distinguish connotations of academic-register synonyms (claim/assertion/contention; investigation/inquiry/probe) (CCSS L.7.5.c)
- Students apply Pass 3 MECHANICS criteria (12 criteria) to a partner's draft.
- Students verify MLA formatting (margins, hanging indent, citation match), spelling, capitalization, and punctuation.
- Students audit word choice for academic-register connotation (L.7.5.c).
Lesson plan
Warm-up
5 minConnotation audit warm: in your draft, find one place where you used CLAIM, ASSERTION, or CONTENTION. Which did you choose and why?
- Listen for awareness vs. accident
- Note: G7 research register favors 'claim' (neutral) over 'assertion' (boldness) unless boldness is wanted
- Tee up: today is mechanics + register
Direct instruction
12 minPASS 3 = MECHANICS. We are NOT looking at content or sentences — only at MLA formatting, citation precision, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and register. The 12 Pass-3 criteria (MG-28): MLA formatting (margins, double-spaced, header); Works Cited alphabetical with hanging indent; each in-text matches a Works Cited entry; titles italicized or quoted correctly; spelling clean; capitalization clean; punctuation clean; pronoun case correct (carry from G6); pronoun consistency; semicolon/colon used correctly if used; commas for coordinate adjectives; quotation marks placed correctly. Green highlighter. Also today: CONNOTATION in academic register (L.7.5.c). CLAIM (neutral, used most often) / ASSERTION (boldness without sufficient support) / CONTENTION (suggests dispute). INVESTIGATION (formal neutral) / INQUIRY (scholarly) / PROBE (aggressive). Research writers choose deliberately.
-
Mismatched citations are common and signal the source was lost. Pass 3 catches this.model Read the body paper. Each parenthetical (e.g., '(Aveni 23)') — flip to Works Cited; find 'Aveni, Anthony F.' If matching entry exists, check off. If not, FLAG. Match cycle must be 100%.prompt Pass 3 check: every in-text citation matches a Works Cited entry. How do you verify?
-
Connotation deliberation is a Pass-3 word-choice move.model Redundancy + connotation. 'Assertion' carries a connotation of unsupported boldness. Coates's argument IS well-supported. Better: 'Coates argues that historical injustice creates compounding harm.' Or 'Coates makes the case that...'prompt Connotation audit: 'Coates argues the assertion that historical injustice creates compounding harm.' Connotation issue?
-
MLA formatting is the lowest-skill but highest-frequency error.model Check ruler in document. Check Format > Line Spacing > Double. Check header. Check title placement. All four = format clean. Any missing = flag.prompt MLA formatting check: are margins 1 inch? Double-spaced? Header with last name and page number? Title centered?
- Pair-share: name 3 Pass-3 criteria.
- Cold Call: how do you verify every in-text matches a Works Cited entry?
- Thumbs: ready for Pass 3 (up) / need re-explanation (down)
M-7-F-WR-18-A
Chart
MG-28 Pass 3 panel: 12 criteria (MLA formatting, Works Cited, in-text matches, italics/quotes, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, pronouns, semicolon/colon, coordinate-adj commas, quotation marks). Green color-coded. Print-ready 11x17.
MG-28
Chart
Physical / non-image
3-pass peer-revision rubric adapted for research papers: 3-band stacked card extending G6 MG-16. PASS 1 — CONTENT (purple, 14 criteria adapted for research): research question focused / thesis answers the question / body paragraphs each make a sub-claim / minimum 3 sources cited overall / sources are credible per CRAAP / synthesis across sources visible in each body paragraph (not list-style) / counterpoint or limitation acknowledged / conclusion offers a so-what / introduction has hook + question + thesis + roadmap / paragraph order follows roadmap / each paragraph has a topic sentence and closing sentence / evidence supports claims / quotes are embedded with quote-sandwich pattern / paraphrases follow 3-rules. PASS 2 — SENTENCE-LEVEL (blue, 10 criteria adapted for research): four sentence types varied (at least one of each type used) / no misplaced or dangling modifiers / coordinate adjectives marked correctly / wordiness audit applied (no obvious wordiness patterns) / active voice default / signal phrases varied (not just 'X says') / interpretive sentences after quotes / parenthetical citations placed correctly / sentence rhythm varied / no sentence over 35 words without justification. PASS 3 — MECHANICS (green, 12 criteria adapted for research): MLA formatting correct (1-inch margins, double-spaced, header) / Works Cited alphabetical with hanging indent / each in-text citation matches a Works Cited entry / titles italicized or quoted correctly / spelling clean / capitalization clean / punctuation clean / pronoun case correct / pronoun consistency / semicolon/colon used correctly if used / commas for coordinate adjectives / quotation marks placed correctly. Bottom rule: 'ONE PASS AT A TIME.' Print-ready 11x17.
M-7-F-WR-18-B
Chart
MG-24 anchor: 3-row card showing similar-denotation words with different connotations (claim/assertion/contention; investigation/inquiry/probe; support/buttress/prop-up). Bottom rule: 'Connotation matters in research register.' Print-ready 11x17.
MG-24
Chart
Connotation in academic register anchor (CCSS L.7.5.c): 3-row card showing similar-denotation words with different connotations for research writing. ROW 1 — for a stated position: CLAIM (neutral — used most often in research) / ASSERTION (suggests boldness without sufficient support — use carefully) / CONTENTION (suggests dispute — for highlighting controversy). ROW 2 — for an investigation: INVESTIGATION (neutral, formal) / INQUIRY (neutral, scholarly) / PROBE (aggressive, journalistic — sometimes too strong). ROW 3 — for evidence-backing: SUPPORT (neutral) / BUTTRESS (formal, structural) / PROP UP (informal, weak — avoid in research). Bottom rule: 'Connotation matters in research register. Pick the word whose connotation matches your tone.' Worked examples for 3-4 more word groups. Print-ready 11x17.
Guided practice
28 min-
PASS 3 conference: exchange drafts. Apply all 12 Pass-3 criteria with green highlights. 22 minutes.scaffold MG-28 Pass 3 sheet; green highlighter; MG-10 + MG-11 + MG-24 at every desk
-
Citation-match audit: physically draw lines from each in-text citation to its Works Cited entry. Any unmatched = flag.scaffold Citation-match worksheet (in-text column + Works Cited column)
Formative assessment
5 min- From partner's Pass-3 feedback: name 2 specific mechanics fixes you will apply (e.g., 'add hanging indent to Works Cited' / 'fix in-text citation on page 2').
Closure
- Restate: Pass 3 = mechanics + register only. All 3 passes done.
- Preview: Researcher's Forum prep
Homework
30 min- Apply all Pass-3 revisions. Type FINAL published version of research paper. Bring next class.
Exercises in this lesson
Differentiation
- MG-28 Pass 3 sheet at every desk
- Green highlighter per pair
- MG-10 + MG-11 + MG-24 anchors at every desk
- Apply Pass 3 to BOTH partner's draft and your own
- Investigate one mechanics issue (e.g., italics) across published research to confirm convention
- Bilingual Pass-3 criterion card
- Reduced-target: 6 criteria instead of 12
- Read-aloud peer with bilingual support
- Reduce to 6 criteria
- Pre-flagged sample errors
- Extended conference time
Teacher notes
Day 18 completes the 3-pass discipline. Citation-match audit is the most important Pass-3 move — mismatched citations indicate plagiarism risk. Save Pass 3 sheets and final published drafts. The 3-pass sheets together form the audit trail for the research paper's revision.