Complete ANALOGIES (a:b::c:d) using 4 word-relationship types (CCSS L.6.5.b)
Exercise Difficulty 4 ~8 min eng.g6.s.ex_27

Construct Argument Analogy

Prompt

Construct an analogy that CLARIFIES your argument's central claim. Use it in your intro paragraph. Name the relation type.

M-6-S-VOC-EX-27-A Interactive Physical / non-image

Analogy-for-argument template with claim-line + analogy-line + relation-type-line + use-in-intro-line. Print-ready 8.5x11.

Answer criteria
type rubric
rubric
Analogy + clarifying function for claim + relation named = 4; analogy + clarifying function = 3; analogy only = 2; not attempted = 1
Hints
  1. A school without art is to education as a meal without spices is to nourishment (item/category or part/whole, depending on read).
  2. The analogy should make a complex claim accessible.
Misconceptions to watch
  • Analogy doesn't clarify the claim (decorative only).
  • Relation type misidentified.
Used in lessons