Apply PRAISE-QUESTION-SUGGESTION protocol with the 12-criterion peer-editing rubric
Exercise Difficulty 4 ~15 min eng.g5.s.ex_29

Pqs Peer Edit Full

MG-18 Chart Physical / non-image

12-criterion peer-editing rubric for spring (extension of fall's 10): 1. INTRO HAS TEXT+AUTHOR+THESIS-ABOUT-TEXT WITH 3-CLAIMS PREVIEW. 2. EACH BODY PARAGRAPH USES CEW (claim + evidence + warrant). 3. EVIDENCE IS EMBEDDED (signal phrase + quote + citation + warrant after). 4. WARRANT EXPLAINS HOW EVIDENCE SUPPORTS CLAIM (not just 'this shows'). 5. CONSISTENT VERB TENSE (literary present for analysis; past for plot summary; controlled shifts). 6. AT LEAST 1 COMPOUND-SENTENCE COMMA used. 7. AT LEAST 1 INTRODUCTORY-CLAUSE COMMA used. 8. AT LEAST 1 APPOSITIVE used with commas. 9. VARIED SENTENCE BEGINNINGS (at least 2 of 4 ways visible). 10. VOICE-CHECK (the 5 voice-fingerprint elements present and deliberate). 11. TONE-CHECK (one named tone from MG-7 maintained throughout). 12. CONCLUSION SYNTHESIZES (not summary). Each criterion has YES/PARTLY/NO + notes + quote space. Print-ready 8.5x11.

Prompt

Peer-edit a partner's draft using the PQS protocol AND the 12-criterion rubric. PRAISE (quote a line). QUESTION (clarifying). SUGGESTION (specific MG-18 move).

M-5-S-EX-29 Illustration Physical / non-image

Reference image of completed PQS notes + 12-criterion rubric for partner's essay. Print-ready 8.5x11.

How it's presented
mode rubric fill
Answer criteria
type rubric
criteria
12 criteria assessedPraise quotes a lineQuestion is clarifyingSuggestion names specific move
Hints
  1. Praise: name what works (quote it).
  2. Suggestion: 'In sentence ___, try MOVE ___.'
Misconceptions to watch
  • Vague praise ('good job')
  • Open-ended question that isn't clarifying
Used in lessons