hist.g6.s.civ.comparative_governance_empire_city_state_kingdom
Comparative governance — empire (Rome, Han, Sasanian, Mauryan, Gupta) vs. city-state (Classical Maya divine kingships at Tikal, Palenque, Calakmul) vs. kingdom (Aksum, early Ghana / Wagadou) — what governs which form emerges? — per Charles Tilly and Walter Scheidel scholarship
Analyze comparative governance across the 8 civilizations: (1) EMPIRES (centralized political unit governing multiple peoples / large territory via bureaucracy + standing army + tax system + ideology) — Rome, Han, Sasanian, Mauryan, Gupta — comparing 4-5 structural features each; (2) CITY-STATES (politically sovereign single-city polity, may form networks but maintain political autonomy) — Classical Maya divine kingships at Tikal vs Calakmul vs Palenque exemplify, comparing with G6-Fall Athens-Sparta-Greek-poleis; (3) KINGDOMS (centralized rule of a relatively-ethnically-homogeneous territory under a king with elite class) — Aksum (per Munro-Hay 1991), early Ghana / Wagadou (per Connah 2015); analyze what geographic + economic + technological + cultural factors govern which form emerges in which region per Tilly's coercion-capital framework.
- Analyze Athenian direct democracy (Cleisthenes' reforms 508 BCE through the Periclean period and the end of the Classical Athenian democracy in 322 BCE) — its institutions (Assembly / Council of 500 / popular courts / ostracism) AND its citizenship-exclusion ratio (~10-13% per Mogens Herman Hansen 1991): only adult male citizens could vote; women, enslaved people (~25-30% of Attic population), metics (resident foreigners), and children were excluded
- Analyze the Roman Republic (509-27 BCE) — its founding mythology (Aeneas, Romulus and Remus, Cincinnatus), mixed-constitution governance (2 Consuls + Senate + Plebeian Tribunes + popular assemblies), the Conflict of the Orders 494-287 BCE (patricians vs plebeians), the Twelve Tables c. 450 BCE, and Cicero's De Re Publica political theory — per Mary Beard's SPQR scholarship
-
hist.g7.f.civ.medieval_governance_byzantium_caliphate
(not yet loaded)
- Treating empire as 'better' or 'more advanced' than city-state or kingdom — different forms suit different geographic and economic conditions
- Confusing the Classical Maya network of competing city-states with a unified 'Maya Empire' — there was no Maya Empire; the Classical Maya were a NETWORK of divine-kingships