Grade 6 Fall — Argumentative Writing, Claim-Evidence-Warrant (Toulmin Lite), Counterclaim Acknowledgment, and Pronoun Mastery
Lesson 10 60 min eng.g6.f.lesson_10.mentor_texts_ethos_pathos_logos

Ethos, pathos, logos — mentor argument texts (Thunberg, Reynolds, Smith, Kelly)

Objectives
  • Students identify ETHOS, PATHOS, and LOGOS appeals in 3 mentor argument texts.
  • Students label the dominant mode in each mentor (Thunberg = pathos; Reynolds = logos with embedded narrative; Smith = ethos through cultural authority).
  • Students decide which mode dominates THEIR own argument and whether that's right for their audience.
Vocabulary
ethospathoslogoscredibilityappealaudience

Lesson plan

Warm-up

5 min

Imagine you're trying to convince a school administrator vs. your peers vs. an online forum to support your argument. Which mode would you lean on most for each?

Teacher moves
  • Hear 3-4 responses; affirm AUDIENCE-AWARE choice
  • Surface tension: pathos for emotional appeal can work — but for administrator, logos likely dominant
  • Frame the lesson: arguers balance all 3

Direct instruction

20 min

Aristotle's 3 modes (MG-6) — adapted for middle school. ETHOS (blue) — the SPEAKER'S CREDIBILITY: 'Why should the audience trust YOU?' Your training, sources, tone. PATHOS (red) — the APPEAL TO EMOTION: how do you connect to what the audience cares about? Story, image, urgency. LOGOS (green) — the LOGICAL REASONING: what evidence do you bring and how do you explain its connection to claim? Every argument balances all 3. Let's read 3 mentors. (1) GRETA THUNBERG, 'How Dare You' UN speech 2019 — PATHOS dominant (moral urgency, accusation), with LOGOS support (climate statistics), and ETHOS through her youth and direct testimony. (2) JASON REYNOLDS, 'Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You' 2020 — LOGOS dominant (accumulated evidence, historical chronology) with embedded PATHOS through narrative moments and ETHOS through Reynolds's accessible voice. (3) CYNTHIA LEITICH SMITH essay on Native representation — ETHOS dominant (her Muscogee Creek authority) with LOGOS through publishing-industry data and PATHOS through specific reader-experience stories. Your essay: which mode dominates? Is that right for your audience?

Key examples
  • Pathos is most powerful when it pivots from emotion to evidence — Thunberg follows with statistics.
    model 'How dare you' is direct moral accusation — pathos peak. 'You have stolen my dreams and my childhood' makes the abstract climate threat personal.
    prompt Identify Thunberg's PATHOS move.
  • Logos doesn't have to be statistics-heavy. Accumulated specific evidence is logos.
    model Stamped builds the claim through ACCUMULATED EVIDENCE — chronological history of racist ideas, with each chapter adding pieces. The accumulation IS the argument.
    prompt Identify Reynolds's LOGOS move.
  • Ethos can be biographical (your authority) or tonal (your reasoned voice). Both work.
    model Smith opens by naming her Muscogee Creek heritage and her 20+ years of writing for Native young readers. That positions her as authoritative voice on Native representation BEFORE she presents claims.
    prompt Identify Smith's ETHOS move.
Checks for understanding
  • Your essay — which mode dominates?
  • Your audience — does dominant-mode fit?
  • Pair-share: name one move you'll borrow from a mentor (a pathos move, a logos move, or an ethos move)
Media
M-6-F-WR-10-A Chart
MG-6 enlarged to 18x24. 3-band card: ETHOS (blue) with Stevenson + Smith examples; PATHOS (red) with Thunberg + Yousafza

MG-6 enlarged to 18x24. 3-band card: ETHOS (blue) with Stevenson + Smith examples; PATHOS (red) with Thunberg + Yousafzai examples; LOGOS (green) with Reynolds + Stevenson examples. Each example has 1-sentence quote from mentor + label of why it counts. Bottom: 'Every strong argument balances all three. Identify your dominant mode; check fit for audience.' Dyslexic-friendly font.

MG-6 Chart
Ethos / Pathos / Logos anchor (Aristotle adapted): 3-band card. ETHOS (blue) — the SPEAKER'S CREDIBILITY: 'Why should th

Ethos / Pathos / Logos anchor (Aristotle adapted): 3-band card. ETHOS (blue) — the SPEAKER'S CREDIBILITY: 'Why should the audience trust you? Your training, your experience, your sources, your tone.' Mentor example: Malala — her authority as a survivor. PATHOS (red) — the APPEAL TO EMOTION: 'How do you connect to what the audience cares about? Story, image, urgency.' Mentor example: Thunberg — 'How dare you' — moral urgency. LOGOS (green) — the LOGICAL REASONING: 'What evidence do you bring, and how do you explain its connection to your claim?' Mentor example: Stevenson — statistics on incarceration + individual case studies. Below: 'Every strong argument balances all three. For your audience: which mode dominates, and is that right?' Print-ready 11x17.

M-6-F-WR-10-B Video Physical / non-image

2-minute excerpt from UN Climate Action Summit September 2019. Caption track on. Pause-and-discuss at 0:30 (pathos: 'How dare you'), 1:00 (logos: climate statistics), 1:45 (ethos: youth as moral authority). Annotation worksheet provided. Volume calibrated for classroom playback.

Guided practice

15 min
Tasks
  • Annotate one mentor passage (Thunberg, Reynolds, or Smith) for ethos/pathos/logos moves.
    scaffold MG-6 anchor open; color-code by mode (blue ethos, red pathos, green logos)
  • Audit your own draft (paragraphs 1-2) for ethos/pathos/logos balance. Note dominant mode.
    scaffold Audit sheet with 3 columns for each mode
Media
M-6-F-WR-10-C Chart Physical / non-image

Print-ready 8.5x11 sheet with 3 columns labeled ETHOS (blue) / PATHOS (red) / LOGOS (green). Each column has 4 rows for student to write a phrase or sentence from their draft demonstrating that mode. Below: 'Dominant mode is ___. My audience is ___. Is this fit right? Why?' Dyslexic-friendly font.

Formative assessment

5 min
Exit ticket
  • Name your dominant mode and explain why it fits (or doesn't fit) your audience.
scoring Dominant mode + audience-aware reasoning = mastery snapshot; dominant mode only = practicing; cannot identify = reteach

Closure

3 min
Moves
  • Restate: Aristotle's 3 modes are ___, ___, ___
  • Preview tomorrow's counterclaim work

Homework

15 min
Tasks
  • Identify 3 sentences in your draft — one ETHOS, one PATHOS, one LOGOS. Strengthen the weakest of the three.

Exercises in this lesson

eng.g6.f.ex_20
Annotate the Thunberg UN speech excerpt for ethos (blue), pathos (red), logos (green) moves. Identify at least 1 of each.
annotate mentor text ethos pathos logos · diff 3
eng.g6.f.ex_21
Audit your draft (paragraphs 1-2) for ethos/pathos/logos. Identify dominant mode. Decide if it fits your audience.
audit own draft modes · diff 3

Differentiation

Scaffolds
  • MG-6 anchor at every desk
  • Audit sheet with 3 columns for color-coding
  • Mentor-passage with pre-marked sample annotations
  • Audience-prompt cards (peer/admin/community/online)
Extensions
  • Find a 4th mentor essay (op-ed in current news) and analyze for the 3 modes
  • Rewrite one of YOUR sentences shifting from one mode to another (e.g., logos statistic → pathos story)
English Learners
  • Bilingual MG-6 anchor with translated mode names
  • Bilingual mentor-passage options where available (Thunberg in Swedish; English translation alongside)
  • Visual annotation icons
Ieps 504s
  • Pre-annotated mentor passage; student identifies 1-2 modes
  • Reduce to 1 mentor instead of 3
  • Extended time

Teacher notes

Ethos/pathos/logos is the most accessible introduction to rhetorical analysis for G6. Students who learn the vocabulary can use it across G7-12. The key insight: every strong argument balances all 3 — pathos-only is manipulation; logos-only is dry; ethos-only is appeal-to-authority. Balance is the craft. Watch for students whose essay is all-logos (statistics with no story) or all-pathos (emotional appeal with no evidence). Coach the balance move. Save the audit sheet for revision pass lesson 17.