eng.g6.f.lesson_03.source_search_research_folder
Source search — building the research folder for an argument
- Students locate at least 3 candidate sources for their argument topic using library databases and verified websites.
- Students capture bibliographic information for each candidate source using MG-30.
- Students introduce Tier-2 Set 13 words 1-5 (claim, evidence, warrant, counterclaim, concede).
Lesson plan
Warm-up
5 minFrom homework: state your research question. Partner identifies what KIND of source would best answer it (statistical study? expert essay? news report? personal testimony?)
- Listen for source-type matching
- Press students whose research question is too broad ('school is bad') to narrow to a defensible question
- Note students who confuse evidence-search with claim-confirmation (looking for sources that already agree)
M-6-F-RES-03-C
Chart
Physical / non-image
5-card spread: CLAIM, EVIDENCE, WARRANT, COUNTERCLAIM, CONCEDE. Each card has the word, syllabification, part of speech, definition in argument context, and example sentence ('I claim that ___ because ___'). Color-coded edges (purple for argument words). Print-ready 8.5x11 per card.
Direct instruction
15 minAn argument lives or dies on its evidence. Today we hunt for sources. Three rules. RULE 1: We need at least 2 sources per argument — never 1 (because 1 source is unverifiable; 2+ allow corroboration). RULE 2: For each source, capture 6 bibliographic fields (MG-30) — author, title, publisher, year, URL or pages, date accessed. We'll evaluate credibility tomorrow; today we COLLECT. RULE 3: Source-search is also CLAIM-CHECK — if you can't find good evidence, your claim might need to change. That's intellectual honesty. Today's vocabulary words 1-5 from Tier-2 Set 13 (MG-19): CLAIM, EVIDENCE, WARRANT, COUNTERCLAIM, CONCEDE.
-
We diversify source types so our argument rests on multiple kinds of evidence.model Statistical study (Hillsdale study), expert essay (pediatric-development source), policy review (CDC), counterclaim source (instructional-time-pressure essay).prompt For the recess example, what kinds of sources would we look for?
-
Always capture all 6 fields. If a digital source has no clear author, note 'no author listed' — this matters for credibility tomorrow.model AUTHOR: Hillsdale College Education Lab. TITLE: 'Recess and Cognitive Function' (in quotes — article). PUBLISHER: Education Quarterly. YEAR: 2019. PAGES: 45-58. DATE ACCESSED: 9/12/2025.prompt Capture this source: Hillsdale College, 'Recess and Cognitive Function,' Education Quarterly, 2019, pages 45-58, accessed 9/12/2025.
- Vocabulary check: define CLAIM in 1 sentence using your own words
- Bibliographic check: which field is the date-accessed and why does it matter?
M-6-F-RES-03-B
Chart
MG-30 enlarged to 11x17 with the Hillsdale recess example fully captured. 6 boxed fields with sample text. Side note: 'For digital sources, ALWAYS include URL and date accessed because online content changes. For print, include pages.' Dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-30
Chart
Bibliographic-information capture card (W.6.8): a 6-field form per source. FIELD 1 — AUTHOR (last name, first name). FIELD 2 — TITLE (italicized for books; "in quotes" for articles). FIELD 3 — PUBLISHER or website name. FIELD 4 — YEAR of publication. FIELD 5 — URL (for digital) or PAGES (for print). FIELD 6 — DATE ACCESSED (for digital sources). Bottom: 'This is basic bibliographic information per CCSS W.6.8. Full MLA/APA style is reserved for G7-G8. At G6: get the 6 fields right.' Worked examples for a book, a news article, and a website. Print-ready 8.5x11 single-sided.
Guided practice
18 min-
Search the library database (or curated link list) for 3 candidate sources on YOUR topic.scaffold Teacher circulates with search-term coaching; pre-curated link lists by topic on board
-
Capture bibliographic info on MG-30 cards (one card per source).scaffold MG-30 example completed on board
M-6-F-RES-03-A
Interactive
Physical / non-image
Digital web page with 8 topic tiles (school uniforms, recess in middle school, screen time, climate action for youth, voting age, public-library funding, animal welfare, plastic bag bans). Each tile expands to show 3-5 vetted sources with annotation (author/publisher/date/perspective). Sources have been pre-checked for G6 reading level and credibility. Print fallback list for offline use.
Formative assessment
5 min- Share 1 of your captured sources — read the 6 fields aloud.
- Use 1 Tier-2 word in a sentence about your topic.
Closure
2 min- Restate one source you're excited about
- Preview tomorrow's source-credibility evaluation
Homework
15 min- Read your 3 captured sources tonight. Highlight 1 piece of evidence from each that could support a CEW body paragraph.
Exercises in this lesson
Differentiation
- MG-30 card at every desk with example
- Pre-curated source link list by topic (8 topics × 3 sources)
- Search-term coaching with teacher conference
- Vocabulary card deck with definitions
- Find a 4th source from a different perspective for the counterclaim
- Note source DIVERSITY — try to find sources from different traditions/voices/types
- Bilingual MG-30 card
- Bilingual source-list with parallel L1 sources where available
- Search-coaching in L1 partner pair
- Reduce to 2 sources
- Teacher provides 2 pre-curated sources for the student's topic
- Extended time
Teacher notes
Source-search is where G6 differs sharply from G5. Students who never had to find their own evidence will struggle. Pre-curate by topic to lower the barrier. Watch for 'confirmation bias' — students searching only for sources that already agree with their pre-formed claim. The teacher move is: 'Find a source that DISAGREES — that's your counterclaim raw material.' Save research folders; tomorrow's lesson works the credibility-evaluation step on these sources.