eng.g3.s.lesson_19.peer_edit_rubric_introduction
The 7-Criterion Peer-Editing Rubric — Reading Like an Editor
- Students identify the 7 criteria of the peer-editing rubric and apply each criterion to a sample informational draft.
- Students conduct one peer-edit conversation with a partner using the MG-13 rubric check-off sheet.
Lesson plan
Warm-up
7 minVideo study: watch MG-12 (2:50-minute peer-edit model on a Grade-3 informational draft). Children note one move they noticed at each timestamp.
- Pause at each of the 7 criterion overlays
- Name what just happened
- Affirm specific observations from children
M-3-S-WR-19-B
Video
Physical / non-image
2:50-minute peer-edit model on a Grade-3 informational draft with timestamped criterion overlays. Two children, multicultural, classroom setting. Both visibly using the MG-13 rubric sheet. Caption track on. Audio includes peer-edit phrases ('I marked criterion 3 as PARTLY because...').
MG-12
Video
Physical / non-image
2:50-minute peer-edit model using the 7-criterion rubric on a Grade-3 informational draft: timestamped overlays at each criterion (0:00 INTRO HAS HOOK + TOPIC, 0:25 THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH TDET, 0:50 TRANSITIONS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS, 1:15 TWO SOURCES CITED, 1:40 SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT, 2:05 VERB TENSE CONSISTENCY, 2:30 CONCLUSION RESTATES + CLOSES). Real-feel classroom; both children visibly use the MG-13 rubric check-off sheet.
MG-13
Chart
Physical / non-image
7-criterion peer-editing rubric check-off sheet (print-ready 8.5x11, one per peer-edit cycle): 1. INTRODUCTION HAS HOOK + TOPIC. 2. THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH TDET (topic-sentence + detail + example + transition). 3. TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS. 4. TWO SOURCES CITED (paraphrase or quote, each with source name). 5. SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT CONSISTENT. 6. VERB TENSE CONSISTENT (one tense per paragraph). 7. CONCLUSION RESTATES BIG IDEA + CLOSES WITH A SO-WHAT. Each criterion has a checkbox (yes / partly / no), a notes line, and a one-sentence quote/example space.
Direct instruction
14 minToday you become PEER EDITORS for informational writing. Last fall you learned the 6-MOVE PEER-EDIT PROTOCOL. This spring we add a RUBRIC — a check-off sheet that tells you exactly WHAT to look for. Look at MG-13. There are 7 CRITERIA. CRITERION 1 — INTRO HAS HOOK + TOPIC: does the introduction pull the reader in and name the topic clearly? CRITERION 2 — THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH TDET: does each body paragraph have a topic sentence, a detail, an example, AND a transition? CRITERION 3 — TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS: do body 2, body 3, and the conclusion start with a transition word? CRITERION 4 — TWO SOURCES CITED: are at least 2 sources named via paraphrase or quote? CRITERION 5 — SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT CONSISTENT: do verbs match subjects throughout? CRITERION 6 — VERB TENSE CONSISTENT: does each paragraph use one tense (or shift deliberately)? CRITERION 7 — CONCLUSION RESTATES + SO-WHAT: does the conclusion restate the big idea and add a so-what? For each, mark YES / PARTLY / NO and write a one-sentence quote or example. REMEMBER: you are a READER, not a RE-WRITER. The writer always picks up the pencil last.
-
Notice the editor gives a specific, named suggestion. Not 'this is wrong' — 'here's a move you could try.'model CRITERION 3 — TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS. Look at sample draft. Body 2 opens with 'Additionally, ...' YES. Body 3 opens with 'Honeybees also...' PARTLY (no transition word, just 'also' inside). Conclusion opens with 'In conclusion, ...' YES. Mark: 2 YES + 1 PARTLY. Note: 'Body 3 needs a transition word at the START — try Furthermore or In addition.'prompt Teacher models one criterion check on a sample draft.
- Name 3 of the 7 criteria.
- What is the rule about who picks up the pencil?
M-3-S-WR-19-A
Chart
11x17 reproduction of MG-13: 7 criteria each with a check-off triplet (YES / PARTLY / NO) and a notes line. Criterion 1 INTRO HAS HOOK + TOPIC; Criterion 2 THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH TDET; Criterion 3 TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS; Criterion 4 TWO SOURCES CITED; Criterion 5 SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT; Criterion 6 VERB TENSE CONSISTENT; Criterion 7 CONCLUSION RESTATES + SO-WHAT. Print-ready, dyslexic-friendly font.
MG-13
Chart
Physical / non-image
7-criterion peer-editing rubric check-off sheet (print-ready 8.5x11, one per peer-edit cycle): 1. INTRODUCTION HAS HOOK + TOPIC. 2. THREE BODY PARAGRAPHS WITH TDET (topic-sentence + detail + example + transition). 3. TRANSITION WORDS AT PARAGRAPH OPENINGS. 4. TWO SOURCES CITED (paraphrase or quote, each with source name). 5. SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT CONSISTENT. 6. VERB TENSE CONSISTENT (one tense per paragraph). 7. CONCLUSION RESTATES BIG IDEA + CLOSES WITH A SO-WHAT. Each criterion has a checkbox (yes / partly / no), a notes line, and a one-sentence quote/example space.
Guided practice
20 min-
Pair up. Swap drafts. Apply the 7-criterion rubric to your partner's draft. Mark each criterion YES / PARTLY / NO with a one-sentence quote or note.scaffold MG-13 rubric sheet + green pencil + MG-12 video as reference if needed
-
Peer-edit conversation: present your rubric to your partner. For each PARTLY or NO, offer one named revision move suggestion.scaffold MG-17 revision-moves anchor at every table
-
Writer picks up the pencil and decides ONE revision to make based on the rubric.scaffold Writer's notebook
Formative assessment
4 min- Show your partner-completed rubric.
- Name ONE revision you decided to make as the writer based on the rubric feedback.
Closure
2 min- Thank your peer editor.
- Predict: tomorrow we apply the rubric to our own drafts before publication.
Homework
10 min- Tonight, apply ONE of the rubric criteria to your own draft. Mark YES/PARTLY/NO. Bring back the rubric tomorrow.
Exercises in this lesson
Differentiation
- Reduced rubric (3 criteria instead of 7) for first-time peer-editors
- Pre-printed quote-and-example slots on the rubric
- Adult-mediated peer-edit at the back table
- Apply the rubric to a SECOND peer's draft.
- Suggest TWO revision moves for each PARTLY/NO criterion.
- Bilingual rubric
- Pre-rehearsed peer-edit phrases
- Audio-recorded peer-edit option
- Reduced rubric (3 criteria)
- Adult-mediated peer-edit
- Oral feedback only with adult scribe
Teacher notes
The 7-criterion peer-editing rubric is the most ambitious instructional addition of the spring term. The first peer-edit cycle with the rubric will feel slow and awkward — children need 2-3 cycles to internalize the routine. Watch for two issues: (1) peer-editors who mark every criterion YES without checking (cursory edit) — pair these children with stronger peer-editors next cycle; (2) peer-editors who attempt to re-write rather than suggest — emphasize the rule 'the writer picks up the pencil last.' The rubric will be applied again in lesson 21 (final draft) and used as a formative observation rubric for peer-editing skill itself (assessed in week 10 and week 18 quick-check, mirroring fall pattern).