eng.g1.s.lesson_14.peer_conference_protocol_first
First Peer Conference — Compliment, Question, Suggestion
- Students conduct a peer conference using the three-step protocol.
- Students give one specific compliment, ask one content question, and offer one suggestion drawn from the four revision moves.
Lesson plan
Warm-up
7 minWatch the 90-second MG-5 peer-conference model video.
- Pause to point out specific moves
- Ask: 'What did the compliment SAY exactly?'
M-1-S-SPK-14-A
Video
Physical / non-image
90-second model video of two Grade-1 children at a peer conference. Writer A reads aloud a short descriptive paragraph about snow. Writer B follows the three-step protocol: (1) 'I like how you said the snow was CRUNCHING — that helped me hear it.' (2) 'What did the snow smell like?' (3) 'You could ADD a smell word.' Writer A says 'thank you.' Adult voiceover names each step as it happens. Caption track on.
MG-5
Video
Physical / non-image
90-second model peer-conference between two Grade-1 children with adult voiceover narrating the three moves. Caption track on for accessibility. Shows compliment ('I like how you said the snow was crunching'), question ('What did the snow smell like?'), suggestion ('You could add a smell word').
Direct instruction
13 minToday is a big day. We are going to do our first PEER CONFERENCE. A peer conference is when a writer and a reader meet to make the writing better. We have a three-step protocol — three moves, in order. (1) COMPLIMENT: tell the writer ONE specific thing they did well — use a QUOTE from their writing. ('I like how you wrote that the snow CRUNCHED.') Not just 'It was good.' (2) QUESTION: ask one question about the CONTENT — something you want to know more about. ('What did the snow smell like?') (3) SUGGESTION: offer ONE of our four revision moves. ('You could ADD a smell detail.') Then the writer says thank you. They do NOT have to take the suggestion — but they listen to it. Today, every pair runs the protocol once.
-
Specific — quotes the word.model 'I like how you said the snow was crunching.'prompt Watching the model video: what was the compliment?
-
About CONTENT, not mechanics.model 'What did the snow smell like?'prompt What was the question?
-
Drawn from our four revision moves (ADD).model 'You could ADD a smell word.'prompt What was the suggestion?
- Is 'It was good' a strong compliment? (No — too vague. Quote a specific line.)
- Is 'You should fix the period' a suggestion that fits this protocol? (No — that's editing, not revising.)
M-1-S-SPK-14-B
Chart
Physical / non-image
Three-step anchor chart 'Peer Conference Protocol.' Step 1 (heart icon): COMPLIMENT — 'I like how you ___' with example 'I like how you said the popcorn was buttery.' Step 2 (question mark icon): QUESTION — 'What did ___?' with example 'What did the popcorn smell like?' Step 3 (lightbulb icon): SUGGESTION — 'You could ___' with example 'You could ADD a smell word.' Bottom: 'The writer says THANK YOU. The writer chooses whether to use the suggestion.' Print-ready 11x17.
Guided practice
18 min-
Pair up with assigned conference partner (heterogeneous pairs). Writer A reads their draft aloud; Writer B uses the protocol. Then swap.scaffold Protocol card with sentence frames in hand of every Writer B
-
Teacher confers with one pair while modeling for the room (fishbowl-style)
Formative assessment
2 min- What compliment did your partner give you? What question?
- What suggestion did you receive — and will you take it?
Closure
- Thank your conference partner. Author's chair tomorrow for those who applied a suggestion.
Homework
8 min- Tell a family member about your peer-conference experience: what compliment, what suggestion?
Exercises in this lesson
Differentiation
- Sentence-frame protocol card: 'I like how you ___', 'What did ___?', 'You could ___.'
- Audio-record protocol option for shy speakers
- Pre-paired with a strong-speaker partner
- After your conference, apply the suggestion in green pen.
- Run a second protocol with a different partner.
- L1 protocol card available
- Drawing-based question option ('point to the part you want to ask about')
- Two-step protocol option (compliment + question only)
- Adult-supported pair
Teacher notes
Most important socio-cognitive lesson of the term. Peer conferring builds writer's identity. Heterogeneous pairing is critical — pair a confident speaker with a less confident one. Fishbowl modeling (you confer with one pair while others watch) is the single best tool for protocol fidelity. Do not assess this lesson as 'product' — assess the process.