Capstone — Medieval World Inquiry Exhibit storybook (Foxfire 3-copy distribution) + civic-action letter (Banks Level-4 social-action) integrating all unit skills, applying MG-7 SEVEN-QUESTION SOURCE CARD + MG-8 four-perspective Crusades protocol + ibn Khaldun's Muqaddimah lens + Abu-Lughod's world-systems lens, with each student contributing one civilization-profile chapter + one civic-action letter mailed to a contemporary descendant-community institution
Exercise Difficulty 3 ~10 min hist.g7.f.ex_51

Self Reflection

MG-7 Diagram
MG-7 SEVEN-QUESTION SOURCE CARD — primary instructional scaffold for ALL source analysis in the unit. 8.5x11 inch double

MG-7 SEVEN-QUESTION SOURCE CARD — primary instructional scaffold for ALL source analysis in the unit. 8.5x11 inch double-sided laminated card. Front: Seven questions with sentence-frame scaffolds. (1) WHO created this source? (Wineburg sourcing) (2) WHEN was it created and where? (Wineburg contextualization) (3) WHY was it created and for whom? (Wineburg sourcing — purpose + audience) (4) WHAT does it say + show + leave out? (Wineburg close reading) (5) WHAT do OTHER sources say? (Wineburg corroboration) (6) WHOSE living descendants connect to this source today? (NMAI 5th — present-tense protocol) (7) WHOSE GOLDEN AGE does this source name — and whose golden age does it occlude? (NEW G7-Fall 7th — Banks Level-3 transformative move; refuses single-narrative golden-age framing). Back: scaffolded sentence frames for each question.

Prompt

Capstone 3-star self-reflection rubric: rate yourself 0-3 stars on FIVE dimensions: (1) MG-7 source-card use; (2) present-tense living-descendant voicing; (3) claim-evidence-warrant argument; (4) multi-civilization integration; (5) Resilience-FIRST + Connection-FIRST honesty. Total 15 stars maximum.

How it's presented
mode text
Answer criteria
type self reflection rubric
rubric
Self-assessment 0-3 stars per dimension. 12+ stars = mastery. 8-11 = practicing. <8 = reteach.
Hints
  1. Self-assessment honestly.
  2. 12+ stars = mastery.
Misconceptions to watch
  • Self-grading too high without evidence