hist.g6.f.ex_11
Evidence Evaluation
MG-13
Chart
Egypt's African Identity 2-Column Scholarly-Debate Handout — left column 'AFRICAN-CENTERED scholarship' with Cheikh Anta Diop (1974) + Martin Bernal Black Athena (1987-2006) + Molefi Kete Asante key arguments; right column 'MAINSTREAM EGYPTOLOGY consensus' with Salima Ikram + AERA-led + Charles Bonnet Kerma + Brigitte Anderson key positions; bottom row 'KEY POINTS OF AGREEMENT' summarizing that ancient Egypt was geographically and culturally African, that Nubian (Kushite) civilization was deeply connected (25th 'Black Pharaohs' Dynasty c. 744-656 BCE), that race as the modern North-American category is anachronistic to ancient Egypt, AND that the question of how ancient Egyptians 'looked' is itself a question about modern racial categories not ancient identity. Style: 2-page handout, balanced scholarly-debate format, G6-appropriate.
Apply MG-13 Egypt's African Identity 2-Column Scholarly-Debate Handout. Identify (a) one argument from African-centered scholarship (Diop / Bernal); (b) one position from mainstream Egyptology consensus (Ikram / AERA-led); (c) one KEY POINT OF AGREEMENT between the two columns. Write a 4-sentence response.
- MG-13 column 1 names Diop + Bernal.
- MG-13 column 2 names Ikram + AERA + Bonnet.
- Bottom row: KEY POINTS OF AGREEMENT.
- Treating ancient Egypt as 'Western'
- Treating the scholarly debate as resolved one-sidedly