Compose a multi-source synthesis essay integrating ≥3 sources (CCSS W.8.1; W.8.2; W.8.7; W.8.8; W.8.9)
Exercise Difficulty 3 ~10 min eng.g8.f.ex_02

Synthesis Map Construction

MG-2 Chart
Synthesis-conversation map anchor: 3-source web template. Three circles labeled SOURCE A, SOURCE B, SOURCE C; arrows bet

Synthesis-conversation map anchor: 3-source web template. Three circles labeled SOURCE A, SOURCE B, SOURCE C; arrows between them labeled AGREES (green), EXTENDS (blue), QUALIFIES (yellow), CONTRADICTS (red). A central diamond labeled MY ARGUMENT — the writer's synthesis claim sits at the center, drawing on all three sources. Rule at bottom: 'Synthesis means the sources CONVERSE — through your argument. If your essay reads source-A, source-B, source-C in sequence with no cross-talk, you have a literature review, not a synthesis.' Worked example: Adichie + Coates + Wallace-Wells on the danger of single narratives. Print-ready 18x24.

Prompt

Given 3 brief source-summaries on a topic, construct a synthesis-conversation map (MG-2). Label cross-source relationships (AGREES / EXTENDS / QUALIFIES / CONTRADICTS) and write a 1-sentence working thesis emerging from the map.

M-8-F-EX-02-A Interactive Physical / non-image

Synthesis-conversation map blank template + working-thesis slot. Print-ready 11x17.

Answer criteria
type rubric
rubric
Map has ≥2 labeled relationships + working thesis is a synthesis claim = mastery; map has ≥1 relationship + thesis is a topic = practicing; no map = reteach
Hints
  1. Identify what each source CLAIMS first, then look for friction or agreement.
  2. A synthesis thesis names the conversation, not just a topic.
Misconceptions to watch
  • Map shows sources but no cross-relationships.
  • Working thesis is 'I will compare these sources' — that's a topic, not a synthesis claim.
Used in lessons