Self Audit Fourteen Criteria

14-criterion argumentative peer-editing rubric (extension of G5-spring's 12): 1. INTRO has hook + context + arguable claim. 2. EACH BODY PARAGRAPH uses CEW (claim + evidence + warrant). 3. EVIDENCE is embedded with signal phrase + quote + citation + warrant sentence after; uses at least 2 sources. 4. WARRANT explains HOW evidence supports claim (the 'because' move; not 'this shows'). 5. COUNTERCLAIM is acknowledged with concession-pivot-refutation sequence. 6. SOURCE CREDIBILITY: each source passes 3 of 4 credibility criteria (author / publication / date / bias). 7. PRONOUN CASE is correct (subjective for subject; objective for object; possessive for ownership). 8. INTENSIVE PRONOUNS used correctly (for emphasis, not as objects). 9. PRONOUN NUMBER/PERSON is consistent (no drifting between 'you' and 'one'). 10. VAGUE PRONOUNS fixed (every this/that/which/it has a clear antecedent). 11. NONRESTRICTIVE ELEMENTS use commas/parentheses/dashes correctly. 12. SENTENCE-PATTERN VARIATION (at least 3 of 6 patterns visible across the essay). 13. TONE consistent and audience-appropriate (formal at G6 default; named tone maintained). 14. CONCLUSION synthesizes or calls to action (not summary). Each criterion = YES/PARTLY/NO + notes + quote space. Print-ready 8.5x11.

Full 14-criterion check-off sheet per MG-21. 14 rows YES/PARTLY/NO. Bottom: 'WEAKEST 3 CRITERIA' + 'REVISION PRIORITIES.' Print-ready 8.5x11.